Should have fouled on the floor before he shot.

DawgU

New member
Oct 27, 2007
220
0
0
Let them win making free throws, but we would get the last shot to win, just don't let Foster have a shot to win it.
 

dawgstudent

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2003
36,580
9,863
113
up 2. That would have been idiotic. Up 3 - I understand why you would foul.
 

HotMop

Well-known member
May 8, 2006
4,812
1,483
113
Yeah...we should have fouled in regulation when up 3. WTF.
 

drunkernhelldawg

New member
Nov 25, 2007
1,372
0
0
Huge disappointmnet after a great great game. Obvious that the ft line was a big part of the loss. Our players had a lot of step-up momnets, but not enough in the end.

Still, the way we played shows we've got some real post-season potential, esp. as the game was at Vandy. No excuses for outplaying them and losing. Not good to let one man beat you. But man, what a game.</p>
 

rem101

Member
Jan 22, 2008
3,135
56
48
really? after losing on the road to a top 15 team by 1 in ot. i doubt it.
 

rugbdawg

New member
Oct 10, 2006
5,251
0
0
are up by 3. However, I think Stans did the right thing in light of our bad free throw shooting. If you foul, Vandy makes 2 and we probably make 1. So then, we are only up 2 with about 10 seconds left and Vandy has the ball.

In short, what I am saying is that you only employ that tactic when you have someone that you KNOW can knock down 2 free throws.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login