Stat of the night: 60% free throws vs their 89%

onewoof

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2008
9,772
5,947
113
We went 14-23 and they went 8 of 9.

And the hustle stat of the game: they had THIRTEEN steals to our 5 on our home court.

Basically they just tried harder and were more focused. SEC will have 5 teams in the tourney. We won't be one.
 

BoDawg.sixpack

Well-known member
Feb 5, 2010
4,353
1,408
113
Most likely because they have a coaching staff that holds them accountable. Our staff wants to get through practice so they can put a Totino's in the microwave and start watching netflix.
 

57stratdawg

Well-known member
Mar 24, 2010
27,800
3,339
113
I’ll be honest - that doesn’t seem like the stat of the night…
 

onewoof

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2008
9,772
5,947
113
I honestly think most of our players will be kinda glad they don't have to play post season. Why bother
 

onewoof

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2008
9,772
5,947
113
It's really the steals and turnovers. They embarrassed us on both.

Free throws could have kept it closer at the end

In the last 4 minutes we made one layup. At home. Goodness.
 

Hugh's Burner Phone

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2017
4,320
3,464
113
When was the last time we were good at the FT line? I remember as far back as Stansbury we sucked at the line. Maybe one guy that shot them at 85% but everybody else was 65%.
 

dog12

Active member
Sep 15, 2016
1,827
463
83
We went 14-23 and they went 8 of 9.

And the hustle stat of the game: they had THIRTEEN steals to our 5 on our home court.

Basically they just tried harder and were more focused. SEC will have 5 teams in the tourney. We won't be one.

I didn't watch the game last night, but I just took a look at the stats and the following stood out to me:
- Tennessee's 2nd-half shooting: FG 14-23 (61%); 3P 4-6 (67%); FT 5-5 (100%)
- MSU's 2nd-half FT shooting: 4-10 (40%)
- number of shots for the game: Tenn - 76 (57 FGs, 19 3Ps); MSU - 58 (44 FGs, 14 3Ps)

When your opponent shoots the ball like that in the 2nd half, it's hard to win the game.

If we make all of our FTs in the 2nd-half, then maybe there's a different outcome. 40% FT shooting is ****.

In my opinion, in every game, we want to take more shots than our opponent. That should be a goal for us.
 

DAWGS1.sixpack

New member
Feb 15, 2007
2,503
0
0
We went 14-23 and they went 8 of 9.

And the hustle stat of the game: they had THIRTEEN steals to our 5 on our home court.

Basically they just tried harder and were more focused. SEC will have 5 teams in the tourney. We won't be one.

Most every game I’ve watched, whether a W or an L and this has been the case. We are soft, all 5 don’t play hard every possession, on either O or D, they don’t hustle or always play with focused effort.
The horrible free throw shooting last night didn’t help but a lot of that is lack of focus and having a tough mentality.
 

HomeBoyDawg

Active member
Oct 22, 2013
920
509
73
Letting that fast little fellar beat us to the goal unopposed for a lay up multiple times didn't help matters.
 

PirateDawg

New member
Jan 9, 2020
1,751
0
0
61% shooting in the second half for UT is the stat of the game

We went 14-23 and they went 8 of 9.

And the hustle stat of the game: they had THIRTEEN steals to our 5 on our home court.

Basically they just tried harder and were more focused. SEC will have 5 teams in the tourney. We won't be one.

Anytime you allow your opponent to shoot 61% you have lost the game. They shot 67% from the 3 and 100 percent from the line. We just aren't good enough to be in the tournament. Maybe a bubble team for the NIT.
 

047Dog

New member
Jan 29, 2020
726
0
0
I didn't watch the game last night, but I just took a look at the stats and the following stood out to me:
- Tennessee's 2nd-half shooting: FG 14-23 (61%); 3P 4-6 (67%); FT 5-5 (100%)
- MSU's 2nd-half FT shooting: 4-10 (40%)
- number of shots for the game: Tenn - 76 (57 FGs, 19 3Ps); MSU - 58 (44 FGs, 14 3Ps)

When your opponent shoots the ball like that in the 2nd half, it's hard to win the game.

If we make all of our FTs in the 2nd-half, then maybe there's a different outcome. 40% FT shooting is ****.

In my opinion, in every game, we want to take more shots than our opponent. That should be a goal for us.

But that will NEVER happen in this Ben Howland offense. I mean, ****, we were down 5 with 2 minutes left and Molinar couldn't even shake loose to dribble or pass the ball inside the 3 point line before 20 seconds drained from the shot clock. And if i remember right, on that possession we ended up turning it over without even getting a shot off. It's just ridiculous that THIS half court atrocity is all Howland can come up with in 2020's basketball. It DOES NOT WORK.
 

onewoof

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2008
9,772
5,947
113
I didn't watch the game last night, but I just took a look at the stats and the following stood out to me:
- Tennessee's 2nd-half shooting: FG 14-23 (61%); 3P 4-6 (67%); FT 5-5 (100%)
- MSU's 2nd-half FT shooting: 4-10 (40%)
- number of shots for the game: Tenn - 76 (57 FGs, 19 3Ps); MSU - 58 (44 FGs, 14 3Ps)

When your opponent shoots the ball like that in the 2nd half, it's hard to win the game.

If we make all of our FTs in the 2nd-half, then maybe there's a different outcome. 40% FT shooting is ****.

In my opinion, in every game, we want to take more shots than our opponent. That should be a goal for us.

They took more shots based on our turnovers (16 to their 10 - caused mostly by their relentless defensive intensity) and their steals (13 to our 5). So they shot 50% and giving them 14 more posessions they made 14 more points than we did.

Add our dismal shooting and less than average defense in the 2nd half and its game over, game way over
 
Last edited:

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
48,457
12,194
113
- number of shots for the game: Tenn - 76 (57 FGs, 19 3Ps); MSU - 58 (44 FGs, 14 3Ps)
I think this is the stat of the game. When you take 18 fewer shots than your opponent, it's hard to win games.
 

VegasDawg13

Member
Jun 11, 2007
2,166
65
48
When was the last time we were good at the FT line? I remember as far back as Stansbury we sucked at the line. Maybe one guy that shot them at 85% but everybody else was 65%.
The reason it seems this way is because our fans think we're bad at free throws even when we're not. I'm sure other fans are the same way, but we seem to expect 80% as a team, when that would actually be good enough to lead the nation some years.

In the last 4 years, we've been average twice (including this year), good once, and horrible once.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login