I say this with much fear and trembling, since have no idea whatsoever if Loggains can coach offense at all. But at halftime against Minnesota, the Huskers have put up 138 yards and 0 points.
That Satterfield offense is taking the Big 10 by storm!
- Thread starter 18IsTheMan
- Start date
That was a well-designed play. lol
Looked like a forward incomplete pass to me.
Looked like a forward incomplete pass to me.
10 points, 295 yards.
Sounds all-too-familiar.
No idea if Loggains will be better or worse, but I don't miss Satt.
Just for fun and giggles, I went over to a Nebraska site to read comments. Yeah....very familiar.
Just don't want to have egg on my face after the UNC game.
Last edited:
I believe I heard Ruhle say that the play was designed by Tom Osborne. I may have heard that wrong. But if true, their only TD wasn’t even a play drawn up by Satterfield.
Yes, my comments are completely independent of how Loggains performs. I've expressed elsewhere I have concerns until we see otherwise, so I'm not doing any victory laps. Just don't miss Satt.
One of my favorite comments from a Nebraska fan:
"Whoever called the two pass plays when we needed to burn clock in the 4th and go make a FG or at least punt should never hold a play sheet again".
Another commentter:
:
"Offensive play calling had my butthole puckering multiple times. I think the OC crapped the bed and I think game management needs improvement".
"Whoever called the two pass plays when we needed to burn clock in the 4th and go make a FG or at least punt should never hold a play sheet again".
Another commentter:
:
"Offensive play calling had my butthole puckering multiple times. I think the OC crapped the bed and I think game management needs improvement".
It doesn't matter if his replacement here fails or succeeds, we are a better program for having Satterfield gone.
Yes. Huskers better have lots of bed sheets in the closet because they will need them.
Yep. Jury is out on Loggains and until he proves otherwise, he's bad NFL OC. But, independent of that, Satt was not good and needed to go.
Yeah,
In fact, I wonder if that's how it went down? Osborne is just hanging around practice and sees this nonsense...."Now WHAT are you doing exactly??"
"Well, sir...we're going to have our QB hand the ball to our RB. We're going to have our DE lined up as a WR. He's going to run around and take a pitch from the RB. The QB is totally out of the play now. We DO NOT want the ball in his hands at all. We're going to have a TE crossing and the DE is going to hit him for a TD."
"No, you're not...idiot."
Yeah, if it were Satt's, he would have had a DE back there to take that pass.
In fact, I wonder if that's how it went down? Osborne is just hanging around practice and sees this nonsense...."Now WHAT are you doing exactly??"
"Well, sir...we're going to have our QB hand the ball to our RB. We're going to have our DE lined up as a WR. He's going to run around and take a pitch from the RB. The QB is totally out of the play now. We DO NOT want the ball in his hands at all. We're going to have a TE crossing and the DE is going to hit him for a TD."
"No, you're not...idiot."
What makes this even better is how their boards were convinced they stole him from us and us acting happy was because we were bitter and coping. Maybe they finally realize that we were genuinely happy he was gone.
Of course it is. But isn’t every play play at this point? Most coaches / teams usually add some wrinkle (route, blocking, formation, etc…) I’m sure what Ruhle meant was that Osborne suggested the play. Probably Ruhle just trying to tap into the resource he has there at Nebraska. Plus it doesn’t hurt for him with the fans to mention Osborne contributed.
Of course I could’ve replied that it was unique in that Nebraska added a bounce pass
