The horrible rule rears it's ugly head

Bulldog Bruce

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2007
3,575
2,618
113
Maybe it will change now.

Buffalo opened the game with a fumble that went out of bounds and they kept the ball. KC fumbles there and it goes out and Buffalo gets the ball.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Anon1697564126

FlotownDawg

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2012
5,544
4,517
113
Nope, that’s not a horrible rule.
So where would you put the next down at if the ball goes thru the end zone?
At the spot?
A fumble forward out of bounds anywhere else on the field. goes back to the spot of the fumble and the offensive team keeps the ball. So if they change the rule, it would be the Chiefs ball at the 1 yard line.
 

Felonious Junk

Well-known member
Oct 23, 2008
1,743
825
113
Maybe it will change now.

Buffalo opened the game with a fumble that went out of bounds and they kept the ball. KC fumbles there and it goes out and Buffalo gets the ball.
You’re oversimplifying it of course to try to make your point. But the two are not the same. The sideline and the end zone aren’t the same in many ways not just this one
 

LordMcBuckethead

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
1,077
831
113
Nope, that’s not a horrible rule.
So where would you put the next down at if the ball goes thru the end zone?
At the spot?
Where the ball was last possessed. Just because it bounced out of their endzone should not automatically change possessions. Personally, I think all fumbles should return to the point the offensive guy fumbled it if it is not recovered or the offense recovers it. No advancement should be allowed on offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peewee.sixpack

eckie1

Well-known member
Jun 23, 2007
3,310
2,540
113
The one that was really negative for us was the the one against Arkansas at home.
Probably cost of the game.
Yeah, in Mullen’s 2nd year in OT? That really sucked. But, the Pigs weren’t nearly as bad as Maine at that point, like they are now.***
 
  • Like
Reactions: leeinator

HRMSU

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2022
927
754
93
Nope, that’s not a horrible rule.
So where would you put the next down at if the ball goes thru the end zone?
At the spot?
The 20....so it would be like a 20 yard penalty. Defense is rewarded for causing the fumble out of bounds but offense keeps the ball 1st and goal from the 20.
 

Bulldog Bruce

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2007
3,575
2,618
113
Once they made the rule that a fumble that goes out of bounds forward is placed at the spot of the fumble and is retained by the offense, that should also hold true here. That rule changed because of the famous Raiders fumble forward play. So that whole touchback rule was in place to discourage the offense from intentionally fumbling into the endzone when it was legal. The problem was if it was 4th down, it was worth the risk and that brought on the spot of the fumble rule. Now if you fumble backwards, the ball is placed there but you keep possession. This even happens if you fumble backwards into your endzone, the ball is actually retained by the offense where it went out, but it is a safety because that is what happens when an offensive play ends in your own endzone.
 

leeinator

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2014
780
560
93
Yeah, in Mullen’s 2nd year in OT? That really sucked. But, the Pigs weren’t nearly as bad as Maine at that point, like they are now.***
Yeah was at that game. Wasn't it Vic Ballard or someone like him trying to reach the ball out to the goal line marker?
 
  • Like
Reactions: eckie1

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,580
10,374
113
I like the rule. The Endzone matters.
It’s a goofy rule that was put in because of the Raiders Holy Roller incident but it contradicts the no advancement on a forward rolling fumble rule.

I have a feeling it will get changed or at least looked at.
 

Villagedawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
965
560
93
Maybe it will change now.

Buffalo opened the game with a fumble that went out of bounds and they kept the ball. KC fumbles there and it goes out and Buffalo gets the ball.
Ball dead behind the goal line one of only three things can result. Touchdown, touchback, safety. Makes perfect sense. The offense literally put the ball out of bounds behind the goal line, and people think that shouldn't matter. I don't get that. A grounded fumble touched by the defense (edited to add. touched in the field of play) that goes out of bounds behind the goal line would be a safety.
 

LexSCDOG

Member
Aug 5, 2014
270
36
28
Maybe it will change now.

Buffalo opened the game with a fumble that went out of bounds and they kept the ball. KC fumbles there and it goes out and Buffalo gets the ball.
I am sure it was because you can try to fumble into the endzone and get a better spot
 

Chesusdog

Well-known member
May 2, 2006
3,657
2,131
113
Fred Reid approves of this message.

(He’s the loser that fumbled the ball into the end zone against Maine)

This is always the first thing that comes to mind when discussing that rule. We will carry that shame the rest of our lives.
 

Bulldog Bruce

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2007
3,575
2,618
113
Ball dead behind the goal line one of only three things can result. Touchdown, touchback, safety. Makes perfect sense. The offense literally put the ball out of bounds behind the goal line, and people think that shouldn't matter. I don't get that. A grounded fumble touched by the defense (edited to add. touched in the field of play) that goes out of bounds behind the goal line would be a safety.
Once they made the rule that a fumble that goes out of bounds forward is placed at the spot of the fumble and is retained by the offense, that should also hold true here. That rule changed because of the famous Raiders fumble forward play. So that whole touchback rule was in place to discourage the offense from intentionally fumbling into the endzone when it was legal. The problem was if it was 4th down, it was worth the risk and that brought on the spot of the fumble rule. Now if you fumble backwards, the ball is placed there but you keep possession. This even happens if you fumble backwards into your endzone, the ball is actually retained by the offense where it went out, but it is a safety because that is what happens when an offensive play ends in your own endzone.
 

Bulldog Bruce

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2007
3,575
2,618
113
This. There is a specific reason the rule exists and why it's different there versus some arbitrary place within the field of play.
Once they made the rule that a fumble that goes out of bounds forward is placed at the spot of the fumble and is retained by the offense, that should also hold true here. That rule changed because of the famous Raiders fumble forward play. So that whole touchback rule was in place to discourage the offense from intentionally fumbling into the endzone when it was legal. The problem was if it was 4th down, it was worth the risk and that brought on the spot of the fumble rule. Now if you fumble backwards, the ball is placed there but you keep possession. This even happens if you fumble backwards into your endzone, the ball is actually retained by the offense where it went out, but it is a safety because that is what happens when an offensive play ends in your own endzone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IBleedMaroonDawg

GloryDawg

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2005
14,881
5,999
113
Being paid millions to hold on the ball so just hold on to the ball.
 

Villagedawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
965
560
93
Once they made the rule that a fumble that goes out of bounds forward is placed at the spot of the fumble and is retained by the offense, that should also hold true here. That rule changed because of the famous Raiders fumble forward play. So that whole touchback rule was in place to discourage the offense from intentionally fumbling into the endzone when it was legal. The problem was if it was 4th down, it was worth the risk and that brought on the spot of the fumble rule. Now if you fumble backwards, the ball is placed there but you keep possession. This even happens if you fumble backwards into your endzone, the ball is actually retained by the offense where it went out, but it is a safety because that is what happens when an offensive play ends in your own endzone.
The object of the game is to put the ball behind your opponent's goal line while in your possession. I think the fumble rule you are talking about is the 4th down rule where only the player who fumbles may advance a fumble on 4th down. The fumble forward out of bounds back to the spot of the fumble is unrelated because this rule concerns balls dead behind the goal line. That is a special class of dead ball. It is behind a goal line. The literal object of the game. It can only be a touchdown, safety, or touchback. Touchdown and safety make no sense since the offense put to ball behind the goal line but don't possess it. Using the philosophy that yall seem to be advocating if you kick the ball out of the endzone, you should tee it back up and rekick from the same spot since a free kick or scrimmage kick is a type of offensive play (you are advancing the ball).

Edited to say it another way. Think of a fumble forward out of bounds behind the goal line as the same as a kick forward out of bounds behind the goal line. Doesn't matter what the intention of the player was. (Say the kicker didn't mean to kick it out of bounds. So what? It's ouit of bounds) What matters is what happened with the ball.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login