- Our only national championship coach ready to be fired 2 years after winning it
- Our football coach who was fired 10 months after accepting the job
- Our only national championship coach ready to be fired 2 years after winning it
- Our football coach who was fired 10 months after accepting the job
I'm not saying they weren't warranted but could you question any coach that wants to restart the clock? Loyalty is the least of our selling points right now. As I said before, as long as Jans is our coach - I'm all for it. He is good at what he does.
That should be a plus in this case.Especially when you consider…
3. The AD who hired him is now at another university.
Exactly
I highly doubt lack of loyalty is a concern here. Those other coaches were fired/is on the hot seat for valid reasons.I'm not saying they weren't warranted but could you question any coach that wants to restart the clock? Loyalty is the least of our selling points right now. As I said before, as long as Jans is our coach - I'm all for it. He is good at what he does.
- Our only national championship coach ready to be fired 2 years after winning it
- Our football coach who was fired 10 months after accepting the job
It's been pretty well documented that Cohen had little to do with Jans getting hired. The folks who pulled those strings are still here.Especially when you consider…
3. The AD who hired him is now at another university.
Exactly
1. That’s legit dumbassery by a fan base.I'm not saying they weren't warranted but could you question any coach that wants to restart the clock? Loyalty is the least of our selling points right now. As I said before, as long as Jans is our coach - I'm all for it. He is good at what he does.
- Our only national championship coach ready to be fired 2 years after winning it
- Our football coach who was fired 10 months after accepting the job
I've not seen a broad sentiment wanting to be rid of Jans.I just do not understand you folks who think we should be rid of Jans because he isn't loyal enough to not look around. As DS correctly says MSU certainly isn't loyal to its coaches, when they have a couple of bad years everyone wants them gone, it is unfair to not expect that in return. And I think the loyalty pushers miss the reality that is modern sports (pro, college, hs) that coaching is more like dating, not marriage. Neither side buys completely in and knows this could be something good, but in all likelihood it will fall apart in the end. No matter how great your fanbase is or how much money you have or even how successful you've been coaches that stay more than 5 years are the exception.
1. But he wasn't fired 2 years after winning it. We showed some loyalty and let him keep his job.I'm not saying they weren't warranted but could you question any coach that wants to restart the clock? Loyalty is the least of our selling points right now. As I said before, as long as Jans is our coach - I'm all for it. He is good at what he does.
- Our only national championship coach ready to be fired 2 years after winning it
- Our football coach who was fired 10 months after accepting the job
Huh. Didn’t realize that.It's been pretty well documented that Cohen had little to do with Jans getting hired. The folks who pulled those strings are still here.
I think the setup is similar but I'd also be willing to wager that he's pissed off some of those people this offseason.Huh. Didn’t realize that.
But is that setup that existed when Cohen was here the same way for Selmon?
Well, let's see. We have less alumni, less money, less students, less everything, than every other school. So that means, if we continue to do what every other school does, or use that as an excuse, we will remain exactly where we are.The real issues here are our bipolar fans. Oh wait that's every fanbase for every school
You didn't realize it, because it's not true.Huh. Didn’t realize that.
Except Scenario #1 didn’t actually happen. We kept Lemonis. And Scenario #2 was pretty much known by everyone to be an interim coach without the title.I'm not saying they weren't warranted but could you question any coach that wants to restart the clock? Loyalty is the least of our selling points right now. As I said before, as long as Jans is our coach - I'm all for it. He is good at what he does.
- Our only national championship coach ready to be fired 2 years after winning it
- Our football coach who was fired 10 months after accepting the job
You fail to mention something else that he should have seen with #1 and #2. He should have seen that both did not live up to expectations and failed miserably in a short period of time. One was terminated immediately when it was apparent and the other sits on a bucket now because the seat under him is so hot this year and hopefully that was eye opening for Jans.I'm not saying they weren't warranted but could you question any coach that wants to restart the clock? Loyalty is the least of our selling points right now. As I said before, as long as Jans is our coach - I'm all for it. He is good at what he does.
- Our only national championship coach ready to be fired 2 years after winning it
- Our football coach who was fired 10 months after accepting the job
I bet #1 could have happened if Selmon wasn't 3 months into the job.Except Scenario #1 didn’t actually happen. We kept Lemonis. And Scenario #2 was pretty much known by everyone to be an interim coach without the title.
None of it really matters though. Arkansas is a higher ceiling program than MSU. By a lot. One of only three SEC programs to win a national championship since the tournament field expanded to 64 teams. If he actually was approached, he’d be foolish not to at least hear them out. No one should harbor ill will towards him for that. It also could have just been a leverage play for an extension, or it could have just been a smokescreen put out by Arkansas folks to cover up the Calipari courtship. I personally don’t really care. In today’s environment where nobody’s commitment extends beyond the next season anyway, any impact to recruiting is way overblown.
If he has 1-2 more years like the past 2, there’s a very high chance he will be gone, so enjoy it while it lasts and then get ready for the next guy.
You didn't realize it, because it's not true.
At what point do you expect an SEC athletic director to actually start doing his damn job? If he's not hitting the ground running, you hired the wrong guy.I bet #1 could have happened if Selmon wasn't 3 months into the job.
3 months and 10 days. He was so close.At what point do you expect an SEC athletic director to actually start doing his damn job? If he's not hitting the ground running, you hired the wrong guy.
Is anybody really claiming that? It sucks that it got out that he was interviewing, and it would be nice if Jans were not willing to look after two years unless it were to go to a blue blood, but it's just not that big of a deal.I just do not understand you folks who think we should be rid of Jans because he isn't loyal enough to not look around. As DS correctly says MSU certainly isn't loyal to its coaches, when they have a couple of bad years everyone wants them gone, it is unfair to not expect that in return. And I think the loyalty pushers miss the reality that is modern sports (pro, college, hs) that coaching is more like dating, not marriage. Neither side buys completely in and knows this could be something good, but in all likelihood it will fall apart in the end. No matter how great your fanbase is or how much money you have or even how successful you've been coaches that stay more than 5 years are the exception.
I agree. I like Jans and I like the fact that his teams play hard. We need to get a few more scoring threats but we've gotten better each season he's been our coach.
Having said that, I also know that if he's not interested in staying here he's going to leave regardless of what we offer to pay him. All we should expect in that case is that our AD has a list of solid, qualified candidates who we can realistically get, and that we gauge their interest in small-town living.
I get what you’re saying but I’m having a tough time believing Jans is looking around at other sports and comparing himself and his job security.I'm not saying they weren't warranted but could you question any coach that wants to restart the clock? Loyalty is the least of our selling points right now. As I said before, as long as Jans is our coach - I'm all for it. He is good at what he does.
- Our only national championship coach ready to be fired 2 years after winning it
- Our football coach who was fired 10 months after accepting the job
Did you not see the “Should we just cut bait on Jans” thread? There are are more than a few folks talking about this.Is anybody really claiming that?
Both coaches in this case absolutely tanked immediately following a successful season and with what was thought to be better returning talent than what was produced.I'm not saying they weren't warranted but could you question any coach that wants to restart the clock? Loyalty is the least of our selling points right now. As I said before, as long as Jans is our coach - I'm all for it. He is good at what he does.
- Our only national championship coach ready to be fired 2 years after winning it
- Our football coach who was fired 10 months after accepting the job
We had a losing record under Polk my freshman year. This was after he had turned it around too.Both coaches in this case absolutely tanked immediately following a successful season and with what was thought to be better returning talent than what was produced.
Arnett totally **** the bed by making too drastic a change of the offense and too soon, especially given the massive change in blocking schemes for the O-linemen. On top of that, he lied about it to keep top players & recruits on board.
The utter collapse under Lemonis of a baseball program of our stature and track record was mind-boggling. Sure, we lost some key players, but we weren't expecting to be as good the following year. We were exponentially worse...not even average within the SEC. How many times has that happened since Ron Polk first came on board and turned us into a consistent winner?
I think most coaches can look at the above situations and understand the desire/need to move on. You can take a step-or-2 back, but taking 6 or 7 steps back when taking 1 or 2 is reasonable to accept is not going to cut it.
That and he was an asshat with a liberal *** wifeEh. I don’t know.
The impression I got from Drebin is that Cohen actually really was the smartest man in the room and delegated (or detached himself from the process some because he waspursuing an exit strategygranting limited autonomy to those with the necessarycapitalexperience).
Why would it have been reasonable to fire the HC when it was obvious the pitching coach was the problem? Selmon did the rational thing and let the HC hire a pitching coach. It’s paid off, bigly.I bet #1 could have happened if Selmon wasn't 3 months into the job.
Yeah because they want the easy winWe have a reputation among non-MSU people as a very quick triggered and unrealistic fanbase when it comes to football and basketball. That is well deserved too. Obviously our "fans" don't agree.
Correct, they love it when we do what we do.Yeah because they want the easy win