You got one main thing right.
Cities all over the country do it with state or federal help.
But here’s your chance at redemption. Do you think if the state and federal government give Jackson money it should be completely managed outside the city of Jackson? Or do you wanna give them another chance to 17 it up?
17 you with your chance at redemption ********.
If funds are allocated to a city, they should be managed in the same way all other funds are managed- and that is by the process that is already established prior to allocation.
Fun fact, my city operates its water 100% on customer revenues. No taxes, whether local, state, or federal are used for service, maintenance, or improvements/expansion.
Our water costs $6.20/1000gal and Jackson's water costs $5.09/1000gal. Our sewer costs $6.35/1000gal and Jackson's sewer costs $7.16/1000gal.
I understand where I live is different from Jackson and each city has its own challenges, so direct comparisons on cost can be viewed as meaningless. At the same time, I provided the numbers to show that a system can operate and grow even at similar levels to what Jackson charges.