Today's Dandy Dozen Reveal - Kendrick Hardy.

[Maroon Eagle]

Link.

 

[NutherT]

But I'd rather have this guy than Montrell Conner. I would certainly take both, however.

 

[bonedaddy401]

argue with 12 yard per carry but I'll try. I like Conner because of his size and speed combo. He is slightly larger than Hardy and is confirmed at 4.40....supposedly. He also has the nickname "Choo - Choo", which I hope we can all agree to call him if he comes to state. "Choo -Choo Conner" could be Hank Flicks greatest call of his career.

Edit: I also like/respect the fact he is sporting a sweater vest in his photo. Very classy Choo - Choo.

 

[DiamondReb]

argue with 12 yard per carry but I'll try. I like Conner because of his size and speed combo. He is slightly larger than Hardy and is confirmed at 4.40....supposedly. He also has the nickname "Choo - Choo", which I hope we can all agree to call him if he comes to state. "Choo -Choo Conner" could be Hank Flicks greatest call of his career.

Edit: I also like/respect the fact he is sporting a sweater vest in his photo. Very classy Choo - Choo.

</p>

 

[Columbus Dawg]

What are you basing this on?

Because based on offers, size, speed, ranking, and most importantly-video, Conner is clearly better than Hardy. No knock on Hardy, I wouldn't mind having him too, but Conner is the better prospect.

 

[Bulldoghair]

Because based on offers, size, speed, ranking, and most importantly-video, Conner is clearly better than Hardy. No knock on Hardy, I wouldn't mind having him too, but Conner is the better prospect.

</p>i just watched both of there hilite reels and i have to say, they are very very similar. their size, speed, and their style of running the football. they are both big physical running backs. if i didnt know what their rankings, size, or seed was before i watched the videos, i would say they are the same in speed and look to be about the same size. the only difference was that hardy for most of his tape, ran from the fullback postion, although he did run from the tailback slot at well. people on here are talking about which one they want, i would say that i hope we are lucky enough to get even one of them, and based on their tape, i'd take either one. and with them being so similar to me on tape, i would then make my decision based on all the tape that we didn't see, if you know what i mean, and their work ethic and such. also, a big big factor is that on tape both were juniors in highschool, and a huge deciding factor will be who physicall developes even more, who gets even stronger, and who just plain out developes as a running back more because there is still alot of room from what i saw from both. to me, they both ran like jacob hestor...only difference is that they are black. lol.

 

[bonedaddy401]

Bulldoghair wrote: _________________________________________________

Because based on offers, size, speed, ranking, and most importantly-video, Conner is clearly better than Hardy. No knock on Hardy, I wouldn't mind having him too, but Conner is the better prospect.

just watched both of there hilite reels and i have to say, they are very very similar. their size, speed, and their style of running the football. they are both big physical running backs. if i didnt know what their rankings, size, or seed was before i watched the videos, i would say they are the same in speed and look to be about the same size. the only difference was that hardy for most of his tape, ran from the fullback postion, although he did run from the tailback slot at well. people on here are talking about which one they want, i would say that i hope we are lucky enough to get even one of them, and based on their tape, i'd take either one. and with them being so similar to me on tape, i would then make my decision based on all the tape that we didn't see, if you know what i mean, and their work ethic and such. also, a big big factor is that on tape both were juniors in highschool, and a huge deciding factor will be who physicall developes even more, who gets even stronger, and who just plain out developes as a running back more because there is still alot of room from what i saw from both. to me, they both ran like jacob hestor...only difference is that they are black. lol.

Things to point out in your post:

"i just watched both of there hilite reels" - hilite huh? There is for a place Faulkner.

"most of his tape, ran from the fullback postion," - postion huh?

" both were juniors in highschool," - highschool huh?

"a huge deciding factor will be who physicall developes even more, who gets even stronger, and who just plain out developes as a" - physicall huh? developes misspelled twice huh?

And finally, you close this expert analisis with "lol".

Please save your recruiting breakdowns for the pond or learn how to type like an educated adult. How do you graduate high school and not even know how to spell it?

 

[Bulldoghair]

Bulldoghair wrote: _________________________________________________

Because based on offers, size, speed, ranking, and most importantly-video, Conner is clearly better than Hardy. No knock on Hardy, I wouldn't mind having him too, but Conner is the better prospect.

just watched both of there hilite reels and i have to say, they are very very similar. their size, speed, and their style of running the football. they are both big physical running backs. if i didnt know what their rankings, size, or seed was before i watched the videos, i would say they are the same in speed and look to be about the same size. the only difference was that hardy for most of his tape, ran from the fullback postion, although he did run from the tailback slot at well. people on here are talking about which one they want, i would say that i hope we are lucky enough to get even one of them, and based on their tape, i'd take either one. and with them being so similar to me on tape, i would then make my decision based on all the tape that we didn't see, if you know what i mean, and their work ethic and such. also, a big big factor is that on tape both were juniors in highschool, and a huge deciding factor will be who physicall developes even more, who gets even stronger, and who just plain out developes as a running back more because there is still alot of room from what i saw from both. to me, they both ran like jacob hestor...only difference is that they are black. lol.

Things to point out in your post:

"i just watched both of there hilite reels" - hilite huh? There is for a place Faulkner.

"most of his tape, ran from the fullback postion," - postion huh?

" both were juniors in highschool," - highschool huh?

"a huge deciding factor will be who physicall developes even more, who gets even stronger, and who just plain out developes as a" - physicall huh? developes misspelled twice huh?

And finally, you close this expert analisis with "lol".

Please save your recruiting breakdowns for the pond or learn how to type like an educated adult. How do you graduate high school and not even know how to spell it?

</p>Thanks Vanna

 

[bonedaddy401]

You are welcome Powe.

 

[Bulldoghair]

can i buy an E?</p>

 

[AssEndDawg]

can i buy an E?</p>

An 'E' as in G-E-D? I don't think it's asking too much for college educated adults to at least make sense.
</p>

 

[Bulldoghair]

can i buy an E?</p>

An 'E' as in G-E-D? I don't think it's asking too much for college educated adults to at least make sense.
</p>

</p>Pat, what in my post #5, about my comparison of conner and hardy, didn't make sense?

 

[jamdawg96]

And finally, you close this expert analisis with "lol".

Please save your recruiting breakdowns for the pond or learn how to type like an educated adult. How do you graduate high school and not even know how to spell it?

</p>
sarcasm? or irony? tough to analyze...

 

[Xenomorph]

...and there's no way we'll ever settle this, but I'd bet you a hundred bucks the guy can't run a 4.40.

Check out NFL combine results sometime.

 

[bonedaddy401]

sarcasm buddy. At least you picked up on it.

 

[Bulldoghair]

sarcasm buddy. At least you picked up on it.

sure it was, vanna...yea ok....dork</p>