Tolu: The culture is changing

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
7,635
7,216
113
I'm not one to bag on others to provide NIL for MSU. But for basketball, we have a group of very committed boosters. Now that we have a coach, I would not be surprised for them to stop at no limits to make sure we stay relevant.

A wise man once said, "We may not have a great basketball culture at MSU, but we damn sure don't have an absence of one, either". That's very true. We have a higher ceiling than many other SEC programs.
 

TXDawg.sixpack

Well-known member
Apr 10, 2009
1,693
1,258
113
i know it’s been discussed before, but does he have another year of eligibility or not? Would LOVE to see him at The Hump for one more season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon1664516582

WilCoDawg

Well-known member
Sep 6, 2012
4,299
2,255
113
i know it’s been discussed before, but does he have another year of eligibility or not? Would LOVE to see him at The Hump for one more season.
I’m going to say he does given that the guys said on T&L that they hoped he would come back despite having participated in senior day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TXDawg.sixpack

Mobile Bay

Well-known member
Jul 26, 2020
3,841
1,535
113
I'm not one to bag on others to provide NIL for MSU. But for basketball, we have a group of very committed boosters. Now that we have a coach, I would not be surprised for them to stop at no limits to make sure we stay relevant.

A wise man once said, "We may not have a great basketball culture at MSU, but we damn sure don't have an absence of one, either". That's very true. We have a higher ceiling than many other SEC programs.
Losing the play in is not relevant. We now have a claim to being the 66th best team in the nation.
 

bully12

Active member
Sep 2, 2012
1,291
412
83
I'm not one to bag on others to provide NIL for MSU. But for basketball, we have a group of very committed boosters. Now that we have a coach, I would not be surprised for them to stop at no limits to make sure we stay relevant.

A wise man once said, "We may not have a great basketball culture at MSU, but we damn sure don't have an absence of one, either". That's very true. We have a higher ceiling than many other SEC programs.
Another truly wise man once said: "Never look up into the rear of an elephant."
 
  • Like
Reactions: onewoof

MSUDOG24

Active member
Mar 31, 2021
566
367
63
"The culture is changing. It’s changing at Mississippi State, in a good way.”

Thanks Howland 🙄
Sorry, but what's the deal with the constant bashing of Howland across multiple threads as a means to say we all really like Jans?
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
48,328
11,979
113
Sorry, but what's the deal with the constant bashing of Howland across multiple threads as a means to say we all really like Jans?
The Howland years were disappointing to say the least. I appreciate that he brought our program back to respectability, but much like Stans's later teams, his teams consistently underperformed (but without all the off court drama).
 

Anon1664516582

Active member
Sep 30, 2022
417
319
63
The Howland years were disappointing to say the least. I appreciate that he brought our program back to respectability, but much like Stans's later teams, his teams consistently underperformed (but without all the off court drama).
I actually sent him a txt telling him I enjoyed reading his article about what to look for in the Pitt game. Within a minute… he replied and said good luck and he really loved Starkville. Ben is a really nice guy… just couldn’t turn make it all work. The Covid year… that team might have made some noise because Perry was finally playing down low instead of jacking 3’s all game long. Woodard would have kicked *** in the tournament.
 

thekimmer

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2012
7,194
1,052
113
"The culture is changing. It’s changing at Mississippi State, in a good way.”

Thanks Howland 🙄
Ben Howland seemed like a very nice person but it became pretty obvious his best days were LONG behind him before he set foot on campus. The best thing I could say about him is he did lift us up out of the Rick Ray era but he just could never get us beyond also-ran status. He should have been canned two years before he was.
 

Seinfeld

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
9,529
3,565
113
"The culture is changing. It’s changing at Mississippi State, in a good way.”

Thanks Howland 🙄
Not trying to start some Howland bashing because I genuinely do appreciate what he did here. I.e. pulling us out of the gutter

However, I can’t think of one player during his tenure aside from Q where I thought, man Howland is getting all there is to get out of that kid. Jans, on the other hand, seemed like he was getting 120% out of the entire roster with maybe one exception
 

Mayor of Little London

Active member
Dec 26, 2016
1,382
231
63
I get Howland falling short when we compare him to Jans after the first year Jans just had, but I’d like to say two things.
Howland took a (at that time), schit job with a schit roster and quickly made us respectable again.
We weren’t the only school courting Jans, if we were still in the gutter he may have chosen a better option.
 

MSUDC11-2.0

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
6,747
9,875
113
I think you have to view the Howland era like two acts in a play:

Howland from 2016 - 2019: slow build back to respectability and an NCAAT berth. Thought it could’ve happened a year sooner, but at least it did happen. Still, the abrupt end with the Liberty loss was a big disappointment.

Howland from 2020 - 2022: Wasted really good talents like Perry, Woodard, Stewart, Molinar, Brooks, and Tolu just to be stuck at an NIT level. People defend the 2020 team because they finished 4th in the SEC, but before COVID hit, that team was not going to the NCAA Tourney without winning games in the SEC Tourney, and Howland never showed any reason to trust him in those kind of games.

Howland did dig us out of the Ray era… But Howland’s peak was much lower than most thought it should’ve been, and then he couldn’t even live up to that in his last three years.

Act I was mostly a positive, Act II fell short of expectations. And the fact that Howland never got the fans to buy in to his program is a black mark as well.
 

curseddawgs

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2021
837
725
93
I think you have to view the Howland era like two acts in a play:

Howland from 2016 - 2019: slow build back to respectability and an NCAAT berth. Thought it could’ve happened a year sooner, but at least it did happen. Still, the abrupt end with the Liberty loss was a big disappointment.

Howland from 2020 - 2022: Wasted really good talents like Perry, Woodard, Stewart, Molinar, Brooks, and Tolu just to be stuck at an NIT level. People defend the 2020 team because they finished 4th in the SEC, but before COVID hit, that team was not going to the NCAA Tourney without winning games in the SEC Tourney, and Howland never showed any reason to trust him in those kind of games.

Howland did dig us out of the Ray era… But Howland’s peak was much lower than most thought it should’ve been, and then he couldn’t even live up to that in his last three years.

Act I was mostly a positive, Act II fell short of expectations. And the fact that Howland never got the fans to buy in to his program is a black mark as well.
Fan buy in is on Howland for sure but he received no help from people in the Bryan Building treating MBB like the fourth most important sport on campus
 
  • Like
Reactions: onewoof

QuadrupleOption

Well-known member
Aug 21, 2012
1,012
804
93
And the fact that Howland never got the fans to buy in to his program is a black mark as well.
This was a big piece of it and I think most of the lack of buy-in was due to the fans (including me) sensing that the team never seemed committed to playing hard.

I don't have a problem with Howland, or the players in that era, but there was way too much inconsistency to get people excited. They'd play lights out one game, then stink up the gym the next. And there was never any rhyme or reason to it.

This first year with Jans has shown that win or lose, they will bust their asses. I can at least respect effort, even if I don't like the outcome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

thekimmer

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2012
7,194
1,052
113
This was a big piece of it and I think most of the lack of buy-in was due to the fans (including me) sensing that the team never seemed committed to playing hard.

I don't have a problem with Howland, or the players in that era, but there was way too much inconsistency to get people excited. They'd play lights out one game, then stink up the gym the next. And there was never any rhyme or reason to it.

This first year with Jans has shown that win or lose, they will bust their asses. I can at least respect effort, even if I don't like the outcome.
Howland's teams were chronic underachievers and that turns fans off. On the other hand, Jan's first team overachieved and fans really eat that up.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login