Their president says selling the athletic department to outside vendor is an option on the table.....
No more than what they were making from the PAC-12. Problem is their budget is about the same as ours and they're trying to spread it over 23 sports compared to our 14.They are just trying to scare alumni and boosters into contributing. How much are they going to make from Big 12? It could get worse.
But at least they are going to be able to rack up more frequent flyer miles. So they’ve go that going for them.No more than what they were making from the PAC-12. Problem is their budget is about the same as ours and they're trying to spread it over 23 sports compared to our 14.
No, I think the shortfall is very real on university side. Problem is the university loaned athletics $55m during COVID and its not being repaid "fast enough"They are just trying to scare alumni and boosters into contributing. How much are they going to make from Big 12? It could get worse.
I wondered this as well. I'd guess most of the endowment money is given/tied to specific entities/projects within the university. So like the $17 million Poopopsbaldhead Endowment for Economic and Sexual Research can't be used because the football department is running short.
Arizona currently boasts 23 varsity teams. The university is set to join the Big 12 Conference next year, and the schools in that league have an average of 17 varsity teams. With all that in mind, cutting some of the sports teams in the athletic department is a strong possibility.
The professor that called for a sale of the Athletics Dept said that if they sell, then a company that knows what its doing could come in and actually manage it properly.How is selling a real option? Can somebody explain why anyone would support University athletics that aren't tied to the university?
Probably a bunch of restricted investments where they can only touch the interest for operations. But I agree - seems like dire circumstances would allow you to cash some of out .Now can someone please explain to me what the hell these Universities do with these endowments again? Must be tied up in crypto.*
View attachment 445322
Let's call him.Maybe they aren’t going to keep their head coach after all
Call JG Wentworth. They need cash nowProbably a bunch of restricted investments where they can only touch the interest for operations. But I agree - seems like dire circumstances would allow you to cash some of out .
Article says the university already loaned the athletic department $55-million that it can't pay back.Now can someone please explain to me what the hell these Universities do with these endowments again? Must be tied up in crypto.*
View attachment 445322
You know what happens next.No, I think the shortfall is very real on university side. Problem is the university loaned athletics $55m during COVID and its not being repaid "fast enough"
You've been Byrned*****Their president says selling the athletic department to outside vendor is an option on the table.....
Kudos to that prof. Maybe they just need to spend around $100 million upgrading baseball and basketball facilities then the money will pour in.The professor that called for a sale of the Athletics Dept said that if they sell, then a company that knows what its doing could come in and actually manage it properly.
I am guessing he is not on the AD's Christmas card list.
I’m guessing that at some point there were adults in the room that specifically tied up their endowment In certain ways to keep future idiots from squandering it. They probably underestimated how quickly stupidity breeds.Now can someone please explain to me what the hell these Universities do with these endowments again? Must be tied up in crypto.*
View attachment 445322
Forget the hearse, cuz he never dies
Its not their athletic dept.... Its the entire university.. In fact, I would be willing to bet the $240m has nothing to do with Athletics as it is more than likely a completely separate budget, other than the $55m the university loaned AthleticsAfter reading the article, two things come to mind
1) If Arizona's athletic department operates with a $100m annual budget, and they are currently $240m in the hole, I mean... they would've had to overspend by $40m/yr for SIX years to get to this deficit. How in the holy hell is this just not being brought to the table as problem?
2) College athletics has been operating for the last twenty years like it can just spend whatever it needs to spend, and TV revenue/giving will continue to back it up. $100m stadium renovations? Bring 'em on. $10m/yr coach contracts? Why not? And now with NIL, it's just blown the top off the coffers again. I've been thinking for years that if we ever reached the point when AD's could no longer depend on December's income to pay for November's expenses, they'd be in big, big trouble. Also, I'm going to venture to guess that Arizona isn't the only school in this predicament
I'm guessing he meant something more akin to a licensing agreement like we do with some state and national parks. Operators would bid on the operating rights by giving the university a guaranteed income stream. Then they run it to make a profit, subject to some constraints to keep them accessible. Turns a liability into a profit center for the governments. Something similar could be done for sports but there'd be a lot of potential landmines.How is selling a real option? Can somebody explain why anyone would support University athletics that aren't tied to the university?
Endowments provide income through the interest/increase in value unless there's very special circumstances, and even the interest draw is limited by most bylaws to 4% to 4.5% a year.Now can someone please explain to me what the hell these Universities do with these endowments again? Must be tied up in crypto.*