I appreciate the back-and-forth, and I guess I was thinking like WV Lion (correctly or incorrectly) that Kerk would be the 3 seed. No need to debate it - I'll live with however it turns out.
But I sort of disagree with you on the Cass match. While Dean winning might've altered his approach a bit, I really believe that Kerk simply thought he could win either or both of the 50/50 throws, even if it was Cass's preference. Now, I wholeheartedly agree that it wasn't the best strategy, as sticking to singles and doubles seems like it would be the winning approach. I'd much prefer him to stay away from throws next time, but don't be surprised if Kerk wants to prove to himself and others that he can win those upper body positions.
So if Kerk does get the 3 seed at B1Gs and faces Gable in the finals, assuming he loses to Gable
, he should get the 2 or 3 seed at Nationals (depending on Shultz). That would keep him away from Gable until the Main Event - gives me chills even thinking about it. I think they'll make 285 the last match this year, regardless of who he faces, because Gable is this year's golden boy, and they want to see him do the backflip to end NCAAs and his career. Could you just imagine it if he were to be upset by Kerk (or even anyone else)? Greatest upset of all time?