indicated, in the long run the recruiting wars tend to even out between OM and MSU. If we start winning again, we will probably regain our slight edge. Hell, even out here in SoCal, UCLA manages to pick up a decent class every two or three years when local kids perceive USC's rosters to be full. Admittedly, it is a much different pool of talent here, but it is very difficult for programs to poach 4 and 5 star kids before USC and UCLA have their say on schollies. That has NEVER been the case in Mississippi. It is an annual rite that LSU, AUB, ALA, and TEN take at least one top drawer kid, with OKL, MIA, FSU, and UGA seemingly alternating years to take the number three or four player in the state. Assuming a 40/40/10/10 split between MSU, OM, USM, and those mentioned above and the top 40 kids don't stretch very far. (16/16/4/4 if you are counting)
Likewise, I am not convinced that the Cellular South plan will do more than keep a handful of partial qualifiers from going to prep school. Like it or not, the public school system in Mississippi is abysmal and the ACT/SAT is still a part of the process. Check out Mississippi's placement on those. In 2007, the only jurisdiction scoring lower than MS was DC and both were 2.5 points or almost 10% below the national average. That is a massive deficiency to make up. The only reason that MS ranks higher on the SAT is because less than 5% of high school graduates in MS take the SAT and their average GPA is above a 3.6, while 96% of graduates take the ACT with an average GPA of 2.5. The statistical anomaly of "regression to the mean" is at work here.
But, again, grades are only a part of the issue when it comes to recruiting primarily in MS.