Maybe.More like a sign that they are trying to keep it regional.
And Memphis & Tulane aren’t interested. Why leave the AAC for the AAC Far West?More like a sign that they are trying to keep it regional.
I don’t think the Pac is interested in paying the AAC’s $27 Million buyout per school.And Memphis & Tulane aren’t interested. Why leave the AAC for the AAC Far West?
Well.. Utah and BYU are in the Big 12, so that would still be the state’s rivalry.Good addition. Utah may not like it though. Gives them a natural in-state rival (usually it's BYU). Will give USU a boost in recruiting capability.
My bad.....read it wrong. Thought it was the B12. I didn't even know there was a PAC12 conference any more.Well.. Utah and BYU are in the Big 12, so that would still be the state’s rivalry.
Utah State will be in the Pac-12.
Well… they were in dire straights, but last week, they managed to poach SDSU, Boise St, Fresno State, and Colorado State from the Mountain West. Now, they’ve picked off Utah State. If they get 4 more, they can dissolve the MWC. They’re going to survive, but as more of an AAC level G6.My bad.....read it wrong. Thought it was the B12. I didn't even know there was a PAC12 conference any more.
PAC12 is up to 7 schools now. Only 1 more to remain an official conference. I expect they’ll add another 3-7 schools.My bad.....read it wrong. Thought it was the B12. I didn't even know there was a PAC12 conference any more.
I don't really see how. If only two of the old pC 12 remain it's not really the pac12 the brand is not the same by adding more g5 schools. Big 12 ACC SEC and Big 10 are only conferences with legitimacy. If pac 12 wants to add they need to steal a few back from power 4 then add extemely strong G5 schools.Good addition. Utah may not like it though. Gives them a natural in-state rival (usually it's BYU). Will give USU a boost in recruiting capability.
He thought USU was going to the Big 12 when he posted that.I don't really see how. If only two of the old pC 12 remain it's not really the pac12 the brand is not the same by adding more g5 schools. Big 12 ACC SEC and Big 10 are only conferences with legitimacy. If pac 12 wants to add they need to steal a few back from power 4 then add extemely strong G5 schools.
Gonzaga is leaving the WCC for the Pac12. Of course they don’t play football so they’re still short a couple of schools.
It’s only mostly deadMy bad.....read it wrong. Thought it was the B12. I didn't even know there was a PAC12 conference any more.
Pretty wild, they haven’t had a football program since 1941.It’d be cool if Gonzaga just started a football team from scratch. It probably wouldn’t take long to have a full team with the new portal
I expect it’ll be a full share in everything but football.Wow. A full share with no football? That sounds a little strange and I wonder if it’s going to deter potential expansion candidates.
The biggest hurdle they're going to have is building a stadium in Spokane. Spokane tore down their 30,000 seat stadium 2-3 years ago and built a 5,000 seat stadium. The minimum for an FBS stadium is 15,000. It would likely be north of $100 Million to build a new FBS caliber 15,000 seat stadium.It’d be cool if Gonzaga just started a football team from scratch. It probably wouldn’t take long to have a full team with the new portal
3 of those seven don't play baseball (Boise State, Colorado State & Utah State) and I think minimum for a baseball league is 6. Rough time to be an Oregon State baseball fan. Even if they do come up with more teams to fill out for baseball, it's going to be a pretty terrible conference outside of the BeaversPAC12 is up to 7 schools now. Only 1 more to remain an official conference. I expect they’ll add another 3-7 schools.
That makes sense. It's just the way Brett's tweet read "Gonzaga, even w/out a football team, will receive a full conference revenue share in Pac-12, source said" made it sound like they're getting the same money as everybody else in the conference.I expect it’ll be a full share in everything but football.
I’ve also seen tweets that have said that Gonzaga to P12 is not happening— at least not yet.
That said, the Pac-12 has the strongest basketball teams in the West (New Mexico notwithstanding) and I think the conference wants a solid league in that sport.
Yeah. That’s kind of why I’m hoping there’s some truth behind the Gonzaga rumors.3 of those seven don't play baseball (Boise State, Colorado State & Utah State) and I think minimum for a baseball league is 6. Rough time to be an Oregon State baseball fan. Even if they do come up with more teams to fill out for baseball, it's going to be a pretty terrible conference outside of the Beavers
That's a good point. I didn't think about baseball being a consideration of which Mountain West teams to go after, but with Oregon State being one of the 'pickers', that could be a factor.3 of those seven don't play baseball (Boise State, Colorado State & Utah State) and I think minimum for a baseball league is 6. Rough time to be an Oregon State baseball fan. Even if they do come up with more teams to fill out for baseball, it's going to be a pretty terrible conference outside of the Beavers
They could build a cool stadium on the Spokane River. They have a beautiful campusThe biggest hurdle they're going to have is building a stadium in Spokane. Spokane tore down their 30,000 seat stadium 2-3 years ago and built a 5,000 seat stadium. The minimum for an FBS stadium is 15,000. It would likely be north of $100 Million to build a new FBS caliber 15,000 seat stadium.
Also, they're only 75 miles from Pullman, so I don't know that Washington State would want to bring them in knowing they'll have a conference football rival that close.
If I were the ACC I'd pick up TulaneMemphis, Tulane, South Florida & UTSA officially not interested. Translation, none of us can get the Big 12 or ACC to take our calls so we’ll just stay where we are.
View attachment 657313
ESPN contractually would have had to pay up because of the pro-rata clause that stated they would scale the per team payout as long as the Big 12 added Power 5 teams, but Fox didn’t have that same pro-rata clause and apparently had no appetite for adding those two, which means adding OSU and WSU would have resulted in a smaller piece of the pie for the other teams.Big 12 should have taken WSU and OSU. Oregon State had a very good team recently and WSU is projected to win 10 games this year.
Maybe.
I’ve been checking out Twitter and there’s talk about UConn — UConn? — joining as a football only member and Gonzaga in basketball only but maybe other sports too…
Football is driving this, baseball is an afterthought, if that.That's a good point. I didn't think about baseball being a consideration of which Mountain West teams to go after, but with Oregon State being one of the 'pickers', that could be a factor.
Of the remaining Mountain West teams, these guys all have baseball teams:
Air Force
Nevada
New Mexico
UNLV
SJSU
I already believed UNLV, Air Force, and SJSU would be the next MWC teams to go Pac-12, but I thought Wyoming would be part of the group too. Having baseball might make Nevada and/or New Mexico a more attractive option though.
Why? They bring nothing to the ACC (or Big 12).If I were the ACC I'd pick up Tulane
Well obviously football is driving this, but if it comes down to Wyoming or New Mexico, I’m not sure there’s any real daylight between them in terms of football program quality, popularity, or marketability. Their other sports and how they align with the Pac-12’s goals could come into the decision making.Football is driving this, baseball is an afterthought, if that.