Video from today's House Appropriations Committee: PSU (and other state-related) Funding Hearing

PSUFTG

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
1,478
2,330
113



Today, the House Appropriations Committee held a budget hearing with our State-related Universities, including Penn State. State Representative Marla Brown had the following exchange with President Bendapudi regarding the alumni nomination process:

"Rep. Brown: I’m concerned about some of the changes that the University has made recently without the input of the General Assembly or the alumni, for that matter as it relates to the selection criteria of candidates--alumni candidates--to the board of trustees. As you are aware, the board recently determined that the alumni trustee candidates will not be listed on the ballot unless a board subcommittee approves them. This has never been the case before. And, now only alumni that pass a test—a test established by the board and that can be changed by the board at their pleasure—can even have their name placed on the ballot. I’ve had a number of constituents in my district call me concerned about this move. I can tell you that people are not happy about it, and the optics on it are not good—as I’m sure you’re aware—as it looks like a conflict of interest—that the board is mainly concerned with picking and choosing the muscle in which the candidates will be serving on the board. So, I’m interested as to why the university needed to make this change?

Bendapudi: Representative, as you are aware, I report to the board. These are all my bosses, and this is not part of something that I am involved in. They were…there was a group that had been working on their governance and how that would work. I’m happy to share your concerns. And, I do know that there have been multiple opportunities by which the board leadership has tried to share it more broadly. But I’m happy to take that back.

Brown: Did you support the change?

Bendapudi: I report to them, and I have no say in it one way or the other.

Brown: What do you say to those who argue the point then that—who are alumni of Penn State--who are some of the most dedicated and generous donors in the country—one of which is a very large donor in my district—she’s the one that brought the concern to me first—that they don’t have a say and that the board is interfering?

Bendapudi: What I can share, Representative, is I completely agree with you. I’ve never seen alumni as passionate about an institution as I do at Penn State, and we are deeply grateful for that. I do understand, and again, as I said we’d be happy to share with you that the process was created by the board with engagement of all of the different constituencies –the alumni representatives and others. And I’m quite serious, I report to them, this is not part of what I drive.

Brown: I understand, but I’ve also reported to a board and they sought my input.

Bendapudi: Not on this—this is their governance.

Brown: Well I would appreciate some follow-up on this so that I can get back to my constituents.

Bendapudi: We will gladly do that."
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,772
26,803
113



Today, the House Appropriations Committee held a budget hearing with our State-related Universities, including Penn State. State Representative Marla Brown had the following exchange with President Bendapudi regarding the alumni nomination process:

"Rep. Brown: I’m concerned about some of the changes that the University has made recently without the input of the General Assembly or the alumni, for that matter as it relates to the selection criteria of candidates--alumni candidates--to the board of trustees. As you are aware, the board recently determined that the alumni trustee candidates will not be listed on the ballot unless a board subcommittee approves them. This has never been the case before. And, now only alumni that pass a test—a test established by the board and that can be changed by the board at their pleasure—can even have their name placed on the ballot. I’ve had a number of constituents in my district call me concerned about this move. I can tell you that people are not happy about it, and the optics on it are not good—as I’m sure you’re aware—as it looks like a conflict of interest—that the board is mainly concerned with picking and choosing the muscle in which the candidates will be serving on the board. So, I’m interested as to why the university needed to make this change?

Bendapudi: Representative, as you are aware, I report to the board. These are all my bosses, and this is not part of something that I am involved in. They were…there was a group that had been working on their governance and how that would work. I’m happy to share your concerns. And, I do know that there have been multiple opportunities by which the board leadership has tried to share it more broadly. But I’m happy to take that back.

Brown: Did you support the change?

Bendapudi: I report to them, and I have no say in it one way or the other.

Brown: What do you say to those who argue the point then that—who are alumni of Penn State--who are some of the most dedicated and generous donors in the country—one of which is a very large donor in my district—she’s the one that brought the concern to me first—that they don’t have a say and that the board is interfering?

Bendapudi: What I can share, Representative, is I completely agree with you. I’ve never seen alumni as passionate about an institution as I do at Penn State, and we are deeply grateful for that. I do understand, and again, as I said we’d be happy to share with you that the process was created by the board with engagement of all of the different constituencies –the alumni representatives and others. And I’m quite serious, I report to them, this is not part of what I drive.

Brown: I understand, but I’ve also reported to a board and they sought my input.

Bendapudi: Not on this—this is their governance.

Brown: Well I would appreciate some follow-up on this so that I can get back to my constituents.

Bendapudi: We will gladly do that."


I will sleep well knowing that Neeli is on the case.
 

Psu00

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,253
1,783
113
Frankly, the PA legislature needs to blow up the PSU Bot governance and set up a new, small, term limited group like at other universities.

Until then, the back room dealings of a select few will continue to manipulate and rig the situation to prevent oversight and guarantee their control.
 

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
9,900
15,776
113



Today, the House Appropriations Committee held a budget hearing with our State-related Universities, including Penn State. State Representative Marla Brown had the following exchange with President Bendapudi regarding the alumni nomination process:

"Rep. Brown: I’m concerned about some of the changes that the University has made recently without the input of the General Assembly or the alumni, for that matter as it relates to the selection criteria of candidates--alumni candidates--to the board of trustees. As you are aware, the board recently determined that the alumni trustee candidates will not be listed on the ballot unless a board subcommittee approves them. This has never been the case before. And, now only alumni that pass a test—a test established by the board and that can be changed by the board at their pleasure—can even have their name placed on the ballot. I’ve had a number of constituents in my district call me concerned about this move. I can tell you that people are not happy about it, and the optics on it are not good—as I’m sure you’re aware—as it looks like a conflict of interest—that the board is mainly concerned with picking and choosing the muscle in which the candidates will be serving on the board. So, I’m interested as to why the university needed to make this change?

Bendapudi: Representative, as you are aware, I report to the board. These are all my bosses, and this is not part of something that I am involved in. They were…there was a group that had been working on their governance and how that would work. I’m happy to share your concerns. And, I do know that there have been multiple opportunities by which the board leadership has tried to share it more broadly. But I’m happy to take that back.

Brown: Did you support the change?

Bendapudi: I report to them, and I have no say in it one way or the other.

Brown: What do you say to those who argue the point then that—who are alumni of Penn State--who are some of the most dedicated and generous donors in the country—one of which is a very large donor in my district—she’s the one that brought the concern to me first—that they don’t have a say and that the board is interfering?

Bendapudi: What I can share, Representative, is I completely agree with you. I’ve never seen alumni as passionate about an institution as I do at Penn State, and we are deeply grateful for that. I do understand, and again, as I said we’d be happy to share with you that the process was created by the board with engagement of all of the different constituencies –the alumni representatives and others. And I’m quite serious, I report to them, this is not part of what I drive.

Brown: I understand, but I’ve also reported to a board and they sought my input.

Bendapudi: Not on this—this is their governance.

Brown: Well I would appreciate some follow-up on this so that I can get back to my constituents.

Bendapudi: We will gladly do that."


She’s a useful idiot.
 

Bwifan

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,586
2,845
113
She’s a useful idiot.
Correct in other words she is a puppet for the board. She just said it. "I don't have any thoughts I just do what they tell me...." Must be nice to not have any thoughts and just do what your bosses tell you and make that kind of money... We could put a monkey in place of her and just pay him a stack of bananas everyday for a lot less money...
It literally is going to take the state of PA legislature getting involved to undue this big pile of :poop: that call themselves the PSU BOT. They are all pigs at the trough feeding and until the state legislature comes along playing the role of farmer and thin the herd nothing will change. They hold all the trump cards at this point. They see something they don't like they change the rules. They don't like Barry shining a bright spotlight into their darkness exposing them all they simply change the rules that all alumni running have to be approved by them first.
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,772
26,803
113
Correct in other words she is a puppet for the board. She just said it. "I don't have any thoughts I just do what they tell me...." Must be nice to not have any thoughts and just do what your bosses tell you and make that kind of money... We could put a monkey in place of her and just pay him a stack of bananas everyday for a lot less money...

But at Penn State, you get what you pay for.
 

ApexLion

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
4,096
7,031
113



Today, the House Appropriations Committee held a budget hearing with our State-related Universities, including Penn State. State Representative Marla Brown had the following exchange with President Bendapudi regarding the alumni nomination process:

"Rep. Brown: I’m concerned about some of the changes that the University has made recently without the input of the General Assembly or the alumni, for that matter as it relates to the selection criteria of candidates--alumni candidates--to the board of trustees. As you are aware, the board recently determined that the alumni trustee candidates will not be listed on the ballot unless a board subcommittee approves them. This has never been the case before. And, now only alumni that pass a test—a test established by the board and that can be changed by the board at their pleasure—can even have their name placed on the ballot. I’ve had a number of constituents in my district call me concerned about this move. I can tell you that people are not happy about it, and the optics on it are not good—as I’m sure you’re aware—as it looks like a conflict of interest—that the board is mainly concerned with picking and choosing the muscle in which the candidates will be serving on the board. So, I’m interested as to why the university needed to make this change?

Bendapudi: Representative, as you are aware, I report to the board. These are all my bosses, and this is not part of something that I am involved in. They were…there was a group that had been working on their governance and how that would work. I’m happy to share your concerns. And, I do know that there have been multiple opportunities by which the board leadership has tried to share it more broadly. But I’m happy to take that back.

Brown: Did you support the change?

Bendapudi: I report to them, and I have no say in it one way or the other.

Brown: What do you say to those who argue the point then that—who are alumni of Penn State--who are some of the most dedicated and generous donors in the country—one of which is a very large donor in my district—she’s the one that brought the concern to me first—that they don’t have a say and that the board is interfering?

Bendapudi: What I can share, Representative, is I completely agree with you. I’ve never seen alumni as passionate about an institution as I do at Penn State, and we are deeply grateful for that. I do understand, and again, as I said we’d be happy to share with you that the process was created by the board with engagement of all of the different constituencies –the alumni representatives and others. And I’m quite serious, I report to them, this is not part of what I drive.

Brown: I understand, but I’ve also reported to a board and they sought my input.

Bendapudi: Not on this—this is their governance.

Brown: Well I would appreciate some follow-up on this so that I can get back to my constituents.

Bendapudi: We will gladly do that."


#leadershipsmallL, #passthebuck #Iknownothingseenothing #alumnipassionatebutnotmycircus
 

retsio

Active member
Oct 13, 2021
188
461
63
On Feb. 14th, the DOeD issued a notice to all individual State Education departments - all DEI offices and programs must detail how they will be eliminated, and they must report their findings by the end of Feb. 28. All DEI programs are to be stopped in pre-education, elementary education, secondary education and post- secondary education. Should compliance by each state not understood and completed, all Federal funding will be terminated, and the DOJ will investigate.

On the PSU.edu website, the BOT has a 'Q&A', and one can write and question the BOT on specific items. Well, I wrote to David K (BOT Pres) and asked when this will be eliminated at Penn State. No answer yet and should the BOT provide some info, I will put this here.
In the meantime - David K (BOT Pres) has a place here in Naples and is invited to the March luncheon, and we have had conversations previously.

Should be interesting - I have calculated $56M so far, maybe more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobPSU92

Nitt1300

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,209
9,900
113
On Feb. 14th, the DOeD issued a notice to all individual State Education departments - all DEI offices and programs must detail how they will be eliminated, and they must report their findings by the end of Feb. 28. All DEI programs are to be stopped in pre-education, elementary education, secondary education and post- secondary education. Should compliance by each state not understood and completed, all Federal funding will be terminated, and the DOJ will investigate.

On the PSU.edu website, the BOT has a 'Q&A', and one can write and question the BOT on specific items. Well, I wrote to David K (BOT Pres) and asked when this will be eliminated at Penn State. No answer yet and should the BOT provide some info, I will put this here.
In the meantime - David K (BOT Pres) has a place here in Naples and is invited to the March luncheon, and we have had conversations previously.

Should be interesting - I have calculated $56M so far, maybe more.
1933