VT/ECU

Cohendawg

New member
Sep 18, 2006
404
0
0
I know the game isn't over yet, but Lou's prediction for ECU over VT (only because his wife wouldn't allow him to come home if he picked VT) doesn't look so dumb.</p>
 

Cohendawg

New member
Sep 18, 2006
404
0
0
I couldn't care less about either of these teams, only watching it because I've got Jackson Comcast. Watching ranked teams lose is fun though.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
50,287
15,156
113
It generally took officials about 15 seconds to get the ball spotted to start the play clock under the old rules (and it wouldn't have been any quicker with ECU players taking their time getting up if the old rules were still in effect). Changing from a 25-second clock to a 40-second clock has no effect on the game. The rule that will shorten the game somewhat is the starting the clock when the ball is spotted on out of bounds plays. But since that won't happen in the last 2 minutes of a half, we'll barely notice it.

BTW, I was glad to see ECU come back to win after almost losing the game to the dumbest rule in football, the 2-point "conversion" after giving up a touchdown.
 

Coach34

New member
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
of why your *** better have an offense. VTech has a good defense and a ****** offense. Offense lost this game for them. You cant always count on your D to win it for you.
 

OEMDawg

New member
Mar 22, 2008
1,384
0
0
It takes the game out of the refs hands. How many times was there a controversy last year with the ref standing over the ball waiting to place it and seeing the game clock tick down. This 40 second rule makes it so much cleaner. The play is over wind the 40 second clock, done deal. If these teams can't get a play called in 40 seconds then they've got problems.

Something that came up in the Rice-SMU game last night was what happens on long incompletions. SMU missed on a long pass and instead of subbing their receiver, they ran him all the way back to the huddle and had to call a timeout because they blew the entire 40 seconds. </p>
 

muddawgs33

New member
Aug 28, 2007
822
0
0
The defense gave up 2 long drives for TD's. But yeah I agree VT's offense looked ******, but I don't think you can put the whole loss on them. It was a team effort all the way down to special teams.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login