Welcome to the PAC 6

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,101
12,114
113
That will leave the MWC with:
San Jose State
UNLV
Hawai'i
Utah State
Nevada
New Mexico State
Wyoming
Air Force

With that collection of schools, it's hard to even justify G5 status.
 

Uscg1984

Well-known member
Jan 28, 2022
1,764
2,344
113
That will leave the MWC with:
San Jose State
UNLV
Hawai'i
Utah State
Nevada
New Mexico State
Wyoming
Air Force

With that collection of schools, it's hard to even justify G5 status.
Not that it matters much, but I think it's New Mexico, rather than NM State that remains. NM State is in C-USA. Perhaps the MWC could poach NM State and UTEP from C-USA. It would certainly be a better geographic fit for them, but I have no idea what the C-USA TV contract looks like.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,101
12,114
113
Not that it matters much, but I think it's New Mexico, rather than NM State that remains. NM State is in C-USA. Perhaps the MWC could poach NM State and UTEP from C-USA. It would certainly be a better geographic fit for them, but I have no idea what the C-USA TV contract looks like.
Ha, yeah, there are six "states" in the conference so got mixed up
 

will110

Joined Aug 17, 2018
Jan 20, 2022
10,397
27,045
113
Why not just absorb the whole conference?
Utah and BYU at a minimum as the next to join?
The PAC "12" just took the best four members. The rest of the MWC adds zero value, or likely even reduces value.

Utah and BYU aren't leaving the Big XII for the Pac 6.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,101
12,114
113
The PAC "12" just took the best four members. The rest of the MWC adds zero value, or likely even reduces value.

Utah and BYU aren't leaving the Big XII for the Pac 6.

The only remaining school from the MWC I can see as adding some value, relative to the other members, would be Air Force,. They're a fairly consistent bowl team and having a service academy adds some prestige.
 

will110

Joined Aug 17, 2018
Jan 20, 2022
10,397
27,045
113
The only remaining school from the MWC I can see as adding some value, relative to the other members, would be Air Force,. They're a fairly consistent bowl team and having a service academy adds some prestige.
I didn't think about Air Force. They do have a good program.

UNLV would get them into Las Vegas, but that's just a really bad program historically.
 

RUMMENIGGE

Active member
Jan 31, 2022
748
462
63
Not that it matters much, but I think it's New Mexico, rather than NM State that remains. NM State is in C-USA. Perhaps the MWC could poach NM State and UTEP from C-USA. It would certainly be a better geographic fit for them, but I have no idea what the C-USA TV contract looks like.
For a geographic fit I would grab FCS schools Eastern Washington, Montana, North Dakota State and South Dakota State.
 

Uscg1984

Well-known member
Jan 28, 2022
1,764
2,344
113
For a geographic fit I would grab FCS schools Eastern Washington, Montana, North Dakota State and South Dakota State.
I'd replace Eastern Washington with Montana State in your list, but I generally agree it makes sense for those schools to be in the MWC.

I can't speak to the Dakota schools, but after living in Montana for about 7 years now, I don't think Montana and Montana State care about making a jump to FBS. From what I can tell, they both seem content to sell out their 25,000 seat stadiums at pretty exorbitant prices while beating up FCS schools with smaller athletic programs than them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atl-cock

atl-cock

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
2,327
1,225
113
I'd replace Eastern Washington with Montana State in your list, but I generally agree it makes sense for those schools to be in the MWC.

I can't speak to the Dakota schools, but after living in Montana for about 7 years now, I don't think Montana and Montana State care about making a jump to FBS. From what I can tell, they both seem content to sell out their 25,000 seat stadiums at pretty exorbitant prices while beating up FCS schools with smaller athletic programs than them.
I believe the universities of Idaho and Montana were, once upon a time, in a conference which preceeded the PAC-8, through the 1950s.
 

LonghornsGamecocks

Active member
Feb 24, 2024
849
1,119
63
I'd replace Eastern Washington with Montana State in your list, but I generally agree it makes sense for those schools to be in the MWC.

I can't speak to the Dakota schools, but after living in Montana for about 7 years now, I don't think Montana and Montana State care about making a jump to FBS. From what I can tell, they both seem content to sell out their 25,000 seat stadiums at pretty exorbitant prices while beating up FCS schools with smaller athletic programs than them.
I'm in Montana at this moment on vacation. Loving it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uscg1984

Uscg1984

Well-known member
Jan 28, 2022
1,764
2,344
113
I'm in Montana at this moment on vacation. Loving it.
I don't know what part you are in, but it's a lot nicer today here in SW Montana than it was earlier in the week. On Monday and Tuesday, the smoke was the worst it has been this summer, but the cold front that moved in last night brought a lot of rain (and snow, up high) and pushed it all out. I'm hoping the change in the weather makes the elk move around a bit more in daylight hours, so I'm taking off work tomorrow to hunt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LonghornsGamecocks

Gamecock Jacque

Joined Dec 20, 2020
Jan 30, 2022
4,107
4,199
113
It was called something else. Disbanded in the late 1950s and reformed into what is the PAC-xx today.
You are correct.

The Pacific Coast Conference, the predecessor to the Pac-10 included Washington, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State, Cal, Stanford, UCLA, USC, Montana, and Idaho
 
  • Like
Reactions: LonghornsGamecocks

LonghornsGamecocks

Active member
Feb 24, 2024
849
1,119
63
I don't know what part you are in, but it's a lot nicer today here in SW Montana than it was earlier in the week. On Monday and Tuesday, the smoke was the worst it has been this summer, but the cold front that moved in last night brought a lot of rain (and snow, up high) and pushed it all out. I'm hoping the change in the weather makes the elk move around a bit more in daylight hours, so I'm taking off work tomorrow to hunt.
I'm up in Belt, near Great Falls. Just taking it easy on a friend's ranch. We got that front and rain too. Cleared all the smoke and haze out of the air.
 

Uscg1984

Well-known member
Jan 28, 2022
1,764
2,344
113
You are correct.

The Pacific Coast Conference, the predecessor to the Pac-10 included Washington, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State, Cal, Stanford, UCLA, USC, Montana, and Idaho
A couple of those destinations would have made for brutal road trips in the first half of the 20th Century. The travel time must have been nuts.
 

Uscg1984

Well-known member
Jan 28, 2022
1,764
2,344
113
A couple of those destinations would have made for brutal road trips in the first half of the 20th Century. The travel time must have been nuts.

It was 1959. It wasn't horse and buggy days.

Actually, no portion of 1959 fell within the first half of the 20th Century to which I was referring.

Nonetheless, when I said the travel was brutal, I didn't mean it was literally treacherous. I was referring to the time it took to travel to places like Pullman, Moscow, and Missoula by train from places like LA or San Francisco during the early days of the conference from 1915 until probably at least WWII. It would have required traveling up to Portland or Seattle, or over to Salt Lake, and then transferring to another train (and perhaps another). I suspect also that when they arrived in those towns, they probably saw quite a number of horses and buggies during those years.
 

Gamecock Jacque

Joined Dec 20, 2020
Jan 30, 2022
4,107
4,199
113
Actually, no portion of 1959 fell within the first half of the 20th Century to which I was referring.

Nonetheless, when I said the travel was brutal, I didn't mean it was literally treacherous. I was referring to the time it took to travel to places like Pullman, Moscow, and Missoula by train from places like LA or San Francisco during the early days of the conference from 1915 until probably at least WWII. It would have required traveling up to Portland or Seattle, or over to Salt Lake, and then transferring to another train (and perhaps another). I suspect also that when they arrived in those towns, they probably saw quite a number of horses and buggies during those years.
You still do not understand that Moscow and Missoula did not join the conference until 1959.
 

Uscg1984

Well-known member
Jan 28, 2022
1,764
2,344
113
You still do not understand that Moscow and Missoula did not join the conference until 1959.
No, the Pacific Coast Conference, precursor to the modern PAC and referenced by @Longhorn's research, was established in 1915 and disbanded in 1959. Idaho was a member from 1922 - 1959, while Montana was a member from 1920 - 1950.
 

Gamecock Jacque

Joined Dec 20, 2020
Jan 30, 2022
4,107
4,199
113
No, the Pacific Coast Conference, precursor to the modern PAC and referenced by @Longhorn's research, was established in 1915 and disbanded in 1959. Idaho was a member from 1922 - 1959, while Montana was a member from 1920 - 1950.
My bad 🙂. But my research reveals Montana joined in 1924. I also found this:

By the early 1920s, bus technology had emerged from an uncomfortable, unreliable curiosity to an increasingly comfortable and inviting form of transportation.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login