I think it remains the same. All of our games will be ESPN, ESPN2, SECN, with the occasional game on ABC (used to be CBS).Us? Whith more exposure on those teams does it take away from our exposure on national TV?
We will be regularly on ABC.I think it remains the same. All of our games will be ESPN, ESPN2, SECN, with the occasional game on ABC (used to be CBS).
I think this article, which foresaw the deal the B1G just signed, puts it all in perspective. Notice the matrices contained in the article and what happens a few years out. Appears to me that he SEC is going to do very well financially. https://footballscoop.com/news/data-firm-projects-sec-100-million-revenue-end-of-decadeWill be interesting to see what the value of the next SEC tv package will be, with the addition of UT sr and Oklahoma.
I meant the university of South Carolina. I am a little concerned that we will have less exposure and that could hurt us in the future.When you say us, are you referring to "us" or the SEC as a whole. If it's "us" then I think we would get the same amount of airtime, but now with the B1G on all 3 major networks that will in all likelihood equate to less eyes on the games we play.
If it’s only them at that point. If this deal effects anyone it’s the ACC who’s deal is for a longer period of time and for far less money.Will be interesting to see what the value of the next SEC tv package will be, with the addition of UT sr and Oklahoma.
We will likely grow our weight around for a better deal. Really the losers are the ACC who are in jeopardy of teams jumping ship probably to join us. In the event that happens we will restructure our deal.I meant the university of South Carolina. I am a little concerned that we will have less exposure and that could hurt us in the future.
And at the announcement of the TV deal the B1G commissioner, stated that they are not done expanding. He made it sound it will be sooner than later.Adding the state of California to its footprint sure seems to have struck gold for the Big 10.