Where we are headed?

Nitt1300

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,017
9,488
113
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobPSU92

JoeLion

Active member
Oct 12, 2021
272
431
63
Still sitting out there is ND. When does that domino fall and where does it land?
 
Last edited:

psu31trap

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2021
1,212
1,108
113
College football can survive but it will take a separate league. There are many variables to discuss here, but depending on how it is marketed, in time it may have a bigger following than the Alabama’s and Texas A&M’s of the world.
 

GrimReaper

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,873
113
Was talking along these lines with my son yesterday. His take is that when the dust finally settles college football will look like the NFL except that the two conferences might be slightly larger. There will be playoffs for the conference champions and then those teams meet for the overall championship.

Sure, other schools may still play football, but it will devolve into what it looked like 100 years ago, which may not be a bad thing.
 

lemonears

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2021
308
545
93
Ten or so years from now college football will be the NFL's minor league, much like baseball's minor leagues or the NBA's D league. The best teams (Alabama, Ohio State, Georgia, etc.) will be the AAA minor league teams. Teams like Akron, Western Kentucky, pitt, Wake Forest, etc. will be the single A teams. Attendance will be down significantly and TV money will be drastically cut. There will be no recruiting. The NFL will dictate where high school kids are placed. Players will continually be shuffled between teams. Each college team will be brand new every year. There will be no post season bowl games. Since the teams will continually have different players there will be no ratings or champions. College football teams will exist to serve the NFL and to provide exercise for the players who don't make the NFL. The college teams will be supported with NFL money.

The NFL will further expand their schedule to fill the void. College football as we have enjoyed it for decades will be a distant memory.
 
Last edited:

psuro

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
7,746
16,963
113
College football needed a shake up. Once you get past the initial shock of it, you will get used to it.

With regard to this concept of “tradition” - as an alum of a University whose football program was shut out of national championships in the past due to this adherence to “tradition” - I am ok with that part of it being gone forever. If this means the beginning of the end of the “CFB committee“ than I am for It even more.
 
Last edited:

Nitt1300

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,017
9,488
113
College football needed a shake up. Once you get past the initial shock of it, you will get used to it.

With regard to this concept of “tradition” - as an alum of a University whose football program was shut out of national championships in the past due to this adherence to “tradition” - I am ok with that part of it being gone forever. If this means the beginning of the end of the “CFB committee“ than I am for It even more.
Change can always be for the better or for the worse. I don't see the current direction as being for the better.
 

PSU Mike

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,314
3,807
113
It’s a weird sitchiation for sure. The whole value of high level, non-NFL football is based on having brands, which are currently university labels. While it sounds reasonable to posit a non-college minor league system, that structure would struggle to have value because there’s no clear path to a new set of brands.
 

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,501
3,409
113
College football needed a shake up. Once you get past the initial shock of it, you will get used to it.

With regard to this concept of “tradition” - as an alum of a University whose football program was shut out of national championships in the past due to this adherence to “tradition” - I am ok with that part of it being gone forever. If this means the beginning of the end of the “CFB committee“ than I am for It even more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbrown

Creamery

Member
Oct 25, 2021
19
26
13
Statistics show that less than 2% of college football players make it to the pros. Therefore the talk of college football being a minor league to the NFL doesn’t make sense for the large majority of players nor does the money stream which will only go to a select few. I’d be interested to know what percentage of rostered college players benefit from NIL?

It’s sad that college presidents, ADs, and the NCAA didn’t have more foresight to set up a better arrangement - they’re ultimately hurting college athletes particularly the majority that can’t go pro…
 

FrontierLion

Active member
Oct 12, 2021
234
451
63
Statistics show that less than 2% of college football players make it to the pros. Therefore the talk of college football being a minor league to the NFL doesn’t make sense for the large majority of players nor does the money stream which will only go to a select few. I’d be interested to know what percentage of rostered college players benefit from NIL?

It’s sad that college presidents, ADs, and the NCAA didn’t have more foresight to set up a better arrangement - they’re ultimately hurting college athletes particularly the majority that can’t go pro…
My prediction ... any football player that has the chance to go pro will only play in one of the two "super conferences" ... the B1G or SEC. They wouldn't have any interest playing in a league that doesn't have the huge exposure, facilities, etc. On the flip side, teams in those two conferences won't have any interest in players who aren't up to that caliber when you have your pick of the litter.

As a result, second-tier schools will be left with true "student-athletes" who may be on scholarship, but are not extended NIL deals. NIL would extend only to those super conferences that act as quasi minor leagues for the NFL.

Those second-tier schools would then create regional conferences, play in bowl games, get back to traditional rivalries and compete for a separate trophy... Which, if it comes true, seems like a structure more to my liking anyway.

The big takeaway is that a true student-athlete in the second-tier could still benefit by having your education paid for.

The semi-pro athletes wouldn't even need to attend classes at that point. Just show up and play football and pursue your dreams of the NFL.
 

IrishHerb

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2021
428
604
93
Notre Dame will go to the B1G.

Maybe. But knowing the priests and faculty at ND, I'd expect them to try to get into the Ivy League if college football ever becomes the minor league of the NFL. I know other ND fans over on the ND boards may disagree with me ... but I've been around ND faculty (my daughter and son-in-law were past professors there) for too long.
 

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
9,627
15,363
113
My prediction ... any football player that has the chance to go pro will only play in one of the two "super conferences" ... the B1G or SEC. They wouldn't have any interest playing in a league that doesn't have the huge exposure, facilities, etc. On the flip side, teams in those two conferences won't have any interest in players who aren't up to that caliber when you have your pick of the litter.

As a result, second-tier schools will be left with true "student-athletes" who may be on scholarship, but are not extended NIL deals. NIL would extend only to those super conferences that act as quasi minor leagues for the NFL.

Those second-tier schools would then create regional conferences, play in bowl games, get back to traditional rivalries and compete for a separate trophy... Which, if it comes true, seems like a structure more to my liking anyway.

The big takeaway is that a true student-athlete in the second-tier could still benefit by having your education paid for.

The semi-pro athletes wouldn't even need to attend classes at that point. Just show up and play football and pursue your dreams of the NFL.

Until NIL rules change, I think that is still a major factor for a lot of elite players.
 

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
10,602
14,652
113
Maybe. But knowing the priests and faculty at ND, I'd expect them to try to get into the Ivy League if college football ever becomes the minor league of the NFL. I know other ND fans over on the ND boards may disagree with me ... but I've been around ND faculty (my daughter and son-in-law were past professors there) for too long.
I’m sure that faculty at most universities would say the same. My PhD advisor had tenure at Michigan before moving to Maryland. “Why’d you leave?” “I couldn’t take the way athletics was emphasized at Michigan.” It’s up to the President and the Board, and I can’t think of a second Robert Maynard Hutchins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IrishHerb

EPC FAN

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
676
851
93
Maybe. But knowing the priests and faculty at ND, I'd expect them to try to get into the Ivy League if college football ever becomes the minor league of the NFL. I know other ND fans over on the ND boards may disagree with me ... but I've been around ND faculty (my daughter and son-in-law were past professors there) for too long.
They ARE different, so that would be shocking but not mind boggling.
 

delcoLion

Active member
Nov 14, 2021
219
277
63
Maybe. But knowing the priests and faculty at ND, I'd expect them to try to get into the Ivy League if college football ever becomes the minor league of the NFL. I know other ND fans over on the ND boards may disagree with me ... but I've been around ND faculty (my daughter and son-in-law were past professors there) for too long.
I’ve always said that the CSCs would prefer to de-emphasize, or drop football all together, if they could. They don’t need it anymore, IMHO.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login