Statistics show that less than 2% of college football players make it to the pros. Therefore the talk of college football being a minor league to the NFL doesn’t make sense for the large majority of players nor does the money stream which will only go to a select few. I’d be interested to know what percentage of rostered college players benefit from NIL?
It’s sad that college presidents, ADs, and the NCAA didn’t have more foresight to set up a better arrangement - they’re ultimately hurting college athletes particularly the majority that can’t go pro…
My prediction ... any football player that has the chance to go pro will only play in one of the two "super conferences" ... the B1G or SEC. They wouldn't have any interest playing in a league that doesn't have the huge exposure, facilities, etc. On the flip side, teams in those two conferences won't have any interest in players who aren't up to that caliber when you have your pick of the litter.
As a result, second-tier schools will be left with true "student-athletes" who may be on scholarship, but are not extended NIL deals. NIL would extend only to those super conferences that act as quasi minor leagues for the NFL.
Those second-tier schools would then create regional conferences, play in bowl games, get back to traditional rivalries and compete for a separate trophy... Which, if it comes true, seems like a structure more to my liking anyway.
The big takeaway is that a true student-athlete in the second-tier could still benefit by having your education paid for.
The semi-pro athletes wouldn't even need to attend classes at that point. Just show up and play football and pursue your dreams of the NFL.