Our core returning starters (James, Tanner, Hancock, Cumbest) combine for a career avg of .275. Those aren't exactly highly exciting stats for your "top returners." To me that says "role player" and not "go to guys." Add in that we currently have more inconsistent "role players" surrounding them, what do we really expect?
Thus far, the difference makers we've brought in to plug immediate holes have been just that, but not in an atrocious way. Somebody has to get out of the funk somehow or it will be a long season.
Similar thing happened to us in 2014. We lose Renfroe and Frazier and we all expected someone out of Rea, Detz, Henderson, Pirtle, Frost and Bradford to replace them. Well, Pirtle stepped up (but not to level of the former two), Henderson and Bradford stayed the same, and Rea and Detz regressed. And we obviously had a regression at catcher after losing Ammarati and Slauter.
Losing a lights out MLB-talent starter in Graveman didn't help either, similarly as us losing Bednar. And funny enough, if you remember, we took Rubber Arm Mitchell out of the bullpen and made him the Friday night starter too.
We struggled early that year too, while Ole Miss had a veteran laden team. Our fans freaked out all year (including me). I don't care now, because we have a natty, and I understand that things are temporary and we have a ton of talented underclassmen who will eventually grow up, we just have to let them. 2014 had the same thing going on (Collins, Humphreys, Rooker, Hudson, Sexton). It's crazy the similarities from that year to this one, except this year, we are in a better situation in regards to overall talent. 2014 rode pitching and Pirtle to a regional berth.
Future is still very bright if people would just choose to see it. As far as this year, we will go only as far as the guys who will step up take us. Pitching isn't as good as 2014, but hitting COULD be better over the long haul (not saying much).