A few snowflakes are coming down. Heading out to Home Depot to buy as many generators I can get my hands on, then onto Kroger to load up on milk and bread.
WHITE DEATH IN BYRAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Thread starter HammerOfTheDogs
- Start date
- Status
A few snowflakes are coming down. Heading out to Home Depot to buy as many generators I can get my hands on, then onto Kroger to load up on milk and bread.
I'm going to restock my Y2K bunker with 10,000 cans of blackeyed peas and 20,000 gallons of Kroger water.
Normal temps this time of year is 57 and it's 29 right now with high around 34 today. No golf this week. Looks like we have a better chance to be moving into the next ice age as opposed to global warming.
I watched some accuweather analysis guy.... He said this is setting up to be one of the coldest winters in thirty years for the southern US. Also that the "normal" pattern of the earth heating and cooling itself will continue and we should be entering a cooling stage for the next decade or so. He also said Sea Ice will be making its "NORMAL" expansion back to where it was during the last cooling period.
I'm not a scientist, but that sounds way more reasonable that the political ******** I have been hearing.
Dubmass AL Gore....
I'm not a scientist, but that sounds way more reasonable that the political ******** I have been hearing.
Dubmass AL Gore....
Time magazine from '77
Time magazine from 2008
There's money to be made from this. Since its obvious now that in 10 years that everyone will be preaching about the coming ice age, lets jump onto the bandwagon quick and beat Al Gore. He's already made enough off of his faux warming crap.
Time magazine from 2008
There's money to be made from this. Since its obvious now that in 10 years that everyone will be preaching about the coming ice age, lets jump onto the bandwagon quick and beat Al Gore. He's already made enough off of his faux warming crap.
Adding, some non-scientific magazines hyped 'global cooling' in the 70s, but no scientists or scientific journals did. I hope people know better than to trust Time magazine to understand science, or anything really.
I hate having to put politics on this board, but damn, have a least a slight clue what you're talking about, however unfashionable that's become in conservative circles. There's plenty of legitimate critiques to make of global warming, you don't need stupid ones.
Don't forget to delete all the data not supporting your view, just like the Univ. of Bristol did. Now read this article,
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091230184221.htm
</p> <h1 id="headline" class="story">No Rise of Airborne Fraction of Carbon Dioxide in Past 150 Years, New Research Finds</h1> <div style="PADDING-BOTTOM: 10px" id="story"> <p id="first"><span class="date">ScienceDaily (Dec. 31, 2009)</span> - Most of the carbon dioxide emitted by human activity does not remain in the atmosphere, but is instead absorbed by the oceans and terrestrial ecosystems. In fact, only about 45 percent of emitted carbon dioxide stays in the atmosphere.</p> </div>
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091230184221.htm
</p> <h1 id="headline" class="story">No Rise of Airborne Fraction of Carbon Dioxide in Past 150 Years, New Research Finds</h1> <div style="PADDING-BOTTOM: 10px" id="story"> <p id="first"><span class="date">ScienceDaily (Dec. 31, 2009)</span> - Most of the carbon dioxide emitted by human activity does not remain in the atmosphere, but is instead absorbed by the oceans and terrestrial ecosystems. In fact, only about 45 percent of emitted carbon dioxide stays in the atmosphere.</p> </div>
1/2 a degree in average global temperature translates to a LOT of warming as far as humans are concerned. hell, the difference between 'normal' and an ice age is (i think) only about 1 degree.
what the CRU did, not U of Bristol, was sex up a graph. they did not delete any data, it was never their data to begin with. tree-ring data is not proven science, but i didn't use any. you don't believe in thermometers?
the airborne fraction can't stay the same forever given rising CO2 releases. it's like water flowing thru a carbon filter, or the lint trap in a dryer. at first, it will just absorb more, and nothing will appear different. until it has reached its capacity. the earth's capacity to absorb carbon is known as the carbon sink. it's like a sink filling up with water. once it's full, it overflows. now consider how much the earth's levels of CO2 have increased even WITH so much being absorbed back into earth's carbon sink. what will happen when it's full?
for even more understanding, look into the geologic time period when O2 was first being released into the atmosphere. at first, there was no noticable effect, the atmospheric concentration stayed negligible, because most of the O2 was being absorbed by soluble iron in the oceans (which bonded to the O2 and precipitated out). common sense (which you appear to be lacking) should make it obvious that this can only continue until there is no more dissolved iron in the oceans. and that's exactly what happened. atmospheric O2 exploded (even though the same amounts were being released as before), and the Earth basically froze. even the oceans froze over. virtually overnight, by geologic standards. i'm sorry your (probably) MS public education didn't teach you that.
and 17 you for being such an *** about it that i had to put that much politics on this board.
on that note, i apologize to everyone else on this board for putting this up, as this ain't a political board. it's not the GW stuff i even gave a **** about, it's the idiotic misunderstanding of basic statistics/probability that hits a nerve. whether it's someone saying one 17ing game means everything or that somewhere, sometime, it was cold disproves GW. IOW, i can find an example of a short QB who was successful, if i ignore all the ones that weren't. finding one (or a few) exceptions doesn't disprove the 17ing trend. hyping the exceptions and ignoring the rest isn't insight, it's just the same BS psychology 'psychics' use to bilk the rubes. the only reason i even put all this now is because of how many sports posts on here match that BS lately.
out.
what the CRU did, not U of Bristol, was sex up a graph. they did not delete any data, it was never their data to begin with. tree-ring data is not proven science, but i didn't use any. you don't believe in thermometers?
the airborne fraction can't stay the same forever given rising CO2 releases. it's like water flowing thru a carbon filter, or the lint trap in a dryer. at first, it will just absorb more, and nothing will appear different. until it has reached its capacity. the earth's capacity to absorb carbon is known as the carbon sink. it's like a sink filling up with water. once it's full, it overflows. now consider how much the earth's levels of CO2 have increased even WITH so much being absorbed back into earth's carbon sink. what will happen when it's full?
for even more understanding, look into the geologic time period when O2 was first being released into the atmosphere. at first, there was no noticable effect, the atmospheric concentration stayed negligible, because most of the O2 was being absorbed by soluble iron in the oceans (which bonded to the O2 and precipitated out). common sense (which you appear to be lacking) should make it obvious that this can only continue until there is no more dissolved iron in the oceans. and that's exactly what happened. atmospheric O2 exploded (even though the same amounts were being released as before), and the Earth basically froze. even the oceans froze over. virtually overnight, by geologic standards. i'm sorry your (probably) MS public education didn't teach you that.
and 17 you for being such an *** about it that i had to put that much politics on this board.
on that note, i apologize to everyone else on this board for putting this up, as this ain't a political board. it's not the GW stuff i even gave a **** about, it's the idiotic misunderstanding of basic statistics/probability that hits a nerve. whether it's someone saying one 17ing game means everything or that somewhere, sometime, it was cold disproves GW. IOW, i can find an example of a short QB who was successful, if i ignore all the ones that weren't. finding one (or a few) exceptions doesn't disprove the 17ing trend. hyping the exceptions and ignoring the rest isn't insight, it's just the same BS psychology 'psychics' use to bilk the rubes. the only reason i even put all this now is because of how many sports posts on here match that BS lately.
out.
Ever looked into the sky and seen this thing called the sun? Yet we want to blame cow farts and automobile emissions for climate change. In fact, a single volcanic eruption spews more CO2 into the atmosphere then all of humanity in a calendar year.
Get a goddamn clue. "Climate change" is another tool of the government to keep people living in fear and direct their attention away from Washington DC where the ever-growing bureaucracy is trampling the constitution and people's individual liberties. It's not a conservative vs. liberal debate. It's bogus science, period.
Climate change is real; the earth's climate is always changing, but human actions aren't the reason.
I would suggest you start here if you want "Science"
Get a goddamn clue. "Climate change" is another tool of the government to keep people living in fear and direct their attention away from Washington DC where the ever-growing bureaucracy is trampling the constitution and people's individual liberties. It's not a conservative vs. liberal debate. It's bogus science, period.
Climate change is real; the earth's climate is always changing, but human actions aren't the reason.
I would suggest you start here if you want "Science"
The forcast for Thusday is only a few degrees warmer in Fayetteville.
<font color="#3333FF">Wed</font> Jan 6
Flurries 38° 13°
</p> <div class="tdTemps">
<font color="#3333FF">Thu</font> Jan 7
Cloudy 15° 0°
</p>
<font color="#3333FF">Fri</font> Jan 8
AM Clouds / PM Sun 18° 5°</p> </div>
<font color="#3333FF">Wed</font> Jan 6
</p> <div class="tdTemps">
<font color="#3333FF">Thu</font> Jan 7
</p>
<font color="#3333FF">Fri</font> Jan 8
You fit in quite nicely with the piece of **** arrogant **** pushing ******** for science on a populace that just isn't smart enough to understand, but should simply open their pocketbook because the "educated" elite say so. Thank you for proving the point. Take your ******** 1/2 degree cel. and shove it up your 1/2 ***.
checked climate gate?...checked the e-mails?
all they want is money and to tear down capitalism...
you must work for a college....how's the grant money these days?.. or are you expecting a windfall in carbon credits?..the next hot commodity on wall street?
while the rest of the world gets screwed in the A$$ paying higher prices for energy, food and everything else that matters... including beer...
all they want is money and to tear down capitalism...
you must work for a college....how's the grant money these days?.. or are you expecting a windfall in carbon credits?..the next hot commodity on wall street?
while the rest of the world gets screwed in the A$$ paying higher prices for energy, food and everything else that matters... including beer...
i give what i get. politics or sports. if he hadn't acted like such an @ss, i would've more politely corrected him.
you don't want me to talk to you like an uneducated idiot? then don't make dumb arguments that fit the stereotype. i'm not your 17ing nanny, it's not my job to baby you. it's a 17ing message board. you would think from your politics you would understand that.</p>
you don't want me to talk to you like an uneducated idiot? then don't make dumb arguments that fit the stereotype. i'm not your 17ing nanny, it's not my job to baby you. it's a 17ing message board. you would think from your politics you would understand that.</p>
There should be a check box on the 1040 that says "Do you believe in global warming?" If you check it.. it zero's our your standard deduction and hands it to the arbor day foundation. Then you are feel better about more trees being planted while you ***** at people not believing in a flawed science while jetting around in your Tahoe or full size car. Lets see how many global warming believers there are then.
I love how all the so called global leaders that are so worried about global warming showed up in Copenhagen on private jets and they had to bring in gas guzzling limos to bus the self righteous around. God forbid anyone snap a picture of them in a Toyota hybrid or they have to exert themselves any on a bike! And of course the "Climate Change" guru Al Gore couldn't fly public trans either.. even he had to fly private.
And I seriously can't believe anyone would believe someone who claims to know so much about global warming and the hurricane on the cover of his movie was spinning backwards.
I love how all the so called global leaders that are so worried about global warming showed up in Copenhagen on private jets and they had to bring in gas guzzling limos to bus the self righteous around. God forbid anyone snap a picture of them in a Toyota hybrid or they have to exert themselves any on a bike! And of course the "Climate Change" guru Al Gore couldn't fly public trans either.. even he had to fly private.
And I seriously can't believe anyone would believe someone who claims to know so much about global warming and the hurricane on the cover of his movie was spinning backwards.
- Status