Willie Fritz beats Kansas State…..

bully12

Active member
Sep 2, 2012
1,348
465
83
You may want to pump the brakes. Over 11 years, he has .560 wining percentage.
His record is beyond question and speaks for itself; 10 years ago, I would have been all for hiring him. But, he's now right at mid-60's age-wise. How much longer would you think he will remain active (?), especially considering how long it might take to rebuild and stabilize our FB program?
 

85Bears

Well-known member
Jan 12, 2020
2,260
2,103
108
His record is beyond question and speaks for itself; 10 years ago, I would have been all for hiring him. But, he's now right at mid-60's age-wise. How much longer would you think he will remain active (?), especially considering how long it might take to rebuild and stabilize our FB program?
An old experienced HC would be a good option to stabilize the program after the Arnett experiment. Once you get it up and running a younger coach could take over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

greenbean.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2012
6,867
5,510
113
His record is beyond question and speaks for itself;
it certainly does, it speaks that his record over 11 years is a little better than 50/50.

“You are what your record says you are,” Bill Parcels.
 
Last edited:

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,923
8,376
113
His record is beyond question and speaks for itself; 10 years ago, I would have been all for hiring him. But, he's now right at mid-60's age-wise. How much longer would you think he will remain active (?), especially considering how long it might take to rebuild and stabilize our FB program?
Not a big deal. I’ve shown this many times on this board, as long as you them late 50s/early 60s. Are they gonna be lifers? No, but good options for a 5-7 year run, which is a lifetime in college football these days

Plus, we often don’t do well in the market for the lifer coaches and upstart young guys
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

Leeshouldveflanked

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2016
11,585
5,645
113
An old experienced HC would be a good option to stabilize the program after the Arnett experiment. Once you get it up and running a younger coach could take over.
We already had that opportunity when Leach died and hired Arnett.
 

HumpDawgy

Well-known member
Apr 6, 2010
4,660
1,741
113
An old experienced HC would be a good option to stabilize the program after the Arnett experiment. Once you get it up and running a younger coach could take over.

Yes, we needed an experienced head coach. No, we didn't need Willie Fritz. Not just the age thing, but hiring Barbay shows it would have been more of the same here with the head scratching decisions.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,923
8,376
113
Willie Fritz hired Kevin Barbay to be his Offensive Coordinator so I seriously question his decision making ability.
Yes, we needed an experienced head coach. No, we didn't need Willie Fritz. Not just the age thing, but hiring Barbay shows it would have been more of the same here with the head scratching decisions.
Barbay had been alright before he came here, so I chalk a lot of that up to T-bro Arnett and all his Peach Pack of Pals that were running around the program. RuN dA bAwL
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85Bears

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
49,973
14,691
113
Not a big deal. I’ve shown this many times on this board, as long as you them late 50s/early 60s. Are they gonna be lifers? No, but good options for a 5-7 year run, which is a lifetime in college football these days

Plus, we often don’t do well in the market for the lifer coaches and upstart young guys
Yeah. People somehow have this idea that when you hire a coach it has to be for 10+ years. It doesn't. The average coaching tenure is about 4-5 years. If we can get one to do a good job for 4-5 years before retiring or moving on, that would be one of the best hires in our history.
 

Trojanbulldog19

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2014
9,216
4,768
113
His record is beyond question and speaks for itself; 10 years ago, I would have been all for hiring him. But, he's now right at mid-60's age-wise. How much longer would you think he will remain active (?), especially considering how long it might take to rebuild and stabilize our FB program?
He also left Tulane to move closer to family in Texas. He wasn't coming to Starkville. I was interested in him about 7 years ago but not now.
Cignetti would have been a good fit. I know for a fact that he waned a power 5 program that he could build and show what he could. I'm not 100 percent certain but I don't even know if we talked to him. I know Indiana is killing it and they have been nothing to mediocre for a long time. Everyone wanted young coach up and coming but cignetti is in his 60s too.
i wanted an older proven coach after Arnett. But our AD decided to hit the easy route and go for Lebby. Another offensive guru that was unproven as a head coach. With no experience building or rebuilding a program.but we can't fire him after year 1 not after firing another guy after year 1. We keep having to do crappy contracts to convince people to come like hutzler so they have reassurance if they are fired. Lebby has just made some fatal mistakes that Mullen didn't make his first year. Of course Lebby is an OU guy with a heavy kiffin and Baylor influence too. These guys give jack **** about defense. Selmon has the same influence.
I wish we would have stayed far away from OU influence in our athletics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85Bears and patdog

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
49,973
14,691
113
This is where the error was. Should have got a search and hired. Recruiting schedule be damned. Turned out that class was a bust and we have changed our most of the roster anyway. Keenum and Bracky killed the program
Hiring (or keeping) a coach for one recruiting class is ALWAYS a terrible idea. You have to hire the best coach you can. If you do. The recruiting will take care of itself.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,923
8,376
113
This is where the error was. Should have got a search and hired. Recruiting schedule be damned. Turned out that class was a bust and we have changed our most of the roster anyway. Keenum and Bracky killed the program
We'll never know. Lenny ran them all off and the ones that remain have a bunch of goobers coaching them.


I understood it at the time, until T-bro Arnett started bringing in his moronic transfers.

Either way, we no AD, it was the best decision at the time. We messed up by letting him fire all Leach's guys.

Time for a search firm would have been this past year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85Bears

Trojanbulldog19

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2014
9,216
4,768
113
Hiring (or keeping) a coach for one recruiting class is ALWAYS a terrible idea. You have to hire the best coach you can. If you do. The recruiting will take care of itself.
Exactly. We had too many involved make quick emotional decisions that torpedoed the program. My faith in Keenum doing anything right for msu athletics is very slim to non existent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,923
8,376
113
Yeah. People somehow have this idea that when you hire a coach it has to be for 10+ years. It doesn't. The average coaching tenure is about 4-5 years. If we can get one to do a good job for 4-5 years before retiring or moving on, that would be one of the best hires in our history.
That's what sucks so hard about Leach's death. We would have had a good run there to help us stay relevant and transition over into the rev-share era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,923
8,376
113
i wanted an older proven coach after Arnett. But our AD decided to hit the easy route and go for Lebby. Another offensive guru that was unproven as a head coach. With no experience building or rebuilding a program.but we can't fire him after year 1 not after firing another guy after year 1. We keep having to do crappy contracts to convince people to come like hutzler so they have reassurance if they are fired. Lebby has just made some fatal mistakes that Mullen didn't make his first year. Of course Lebby is an OU guy with a heavy kiffin and Baylor influence too. These guys give jack **** about defense. Selmon has the same influence.
Mullen didn't make those mistakes because he was smart enough to know you have to lead with defense at MSU. That's the players we produce, that's our tradition. Salmon and Lenny have no plan at all, except shltshowtime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login