Toggle sidebar

Yea we miss Satterfield..

E

engineercock86

New member
Oct 9, 2022
7
19
3
Satterfield had many more play makers on the team when he was calling plays vs. Kitchens tonight. Satterfield did little to nothing with that talent. Despite what Beamer says, I really think we were using Kitchen's play book against Tn and Clemson.

I'm proud of the kids that played tonight. They are true Gamecocks. I wish nothing but the best for the kids that decided to go pro. The transfer players (that were starters)....not so much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123
G

GoCocksFight2021

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
1,065
628
113
engineercock86 said:
Satterfield had many more play makers on the team when he was calling plays vs. Kitchens tonight. Satterfield did little to nothing with that talent. Despite what Beamer says, I really think we were using Kitchen's play book against Tn and Clemson.

I'm proud of the kids that played tonight. They are true Gamecocks. I wish nothing but the best for the kids that decided to go pro. The transfer players (that were starters)....not so much.
Click to expand...

Nothing, other than drop 63 on Tennessee and beat Clemson at Clemson. And beat UNC in our bowl last year, with the 5th string QB.

Sorry, didn't seem to be a valid excuse last year when we were started a f'ing grad assistant at QB. And there was plenty of talent on the field to beat ND. That wasn't an SEC defense out there. And that QB they had out there was not good at all.
 
Go Gamecocks

Go Gamecocks

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2022
798
701
93
Mrs. Satterfield is back.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lurker123
8

864guy

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2022
927
1,579
93
Beamer covering for his friend, and others covering for Beamer, saying for sure they knew Satt was calling plays, was a lie. Sure did not look like the game we played in Florida and here with Mizzou.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom