Skip to main content

Brett Favre files response to Shannon Sharpe's motion to dismiss defamation suit

Grant Grubbsby:Grant Grubbs05/29/23

grant_grubbs_

brett-favre-files-response-to-shannon-sharpes-motion-to-dismiss-defamation-suit
Photo by Patrick McDermott | Getty Images

Shannon Sharpe recently motioned to dismiss Brett Favre’s defamation lawsuit. However, on Wednesday, Favre fired back with a 24-page legal brief combatting the motion.

The conflict began on on Feb. 9, when Favre sued both Sharpe and Pat McAfee for defamation. Favre claimed the two media personalities used their platforms to push false accusations and insinuations regarding himself.

Over two weeks ago, McAfee was able to settle his case without a cash settlement. Sharpe has not had the same luck despite arguing his statements were opinions and hyperbole, not based in fact. Favre isn’t having it.

Criticism was first thrown at the 53-year-old former NFL star quarterback earlier this year after the Mississippi state department alleged Favre moved money from a welfare fund to to build an indoor practice facility for the University of Southern Mississippi University football team.

Favre claims the lawsuit pointed toward him is a distraction from the state department’s own responsibility for misspending of almost $100 million in public funds. Nonetheless, both Sharpe and McAfee’s comments were originally aimed at Favre.

Top 10

  1. 1

    Biff Poggi

    Charlotte firing head coach

    Breaking
  2. 2

    Skipping SEC title game

    Coaches prefer sitting out

    Hot
  3. 3

    Predicting new CFP Top 12

    BCS formula predicts 12-team bracket

  4. 4

    Kiffin calls out Saban

    'He's now the rat poisoner'

    New
  5. 5

    Dabo rips refs

    Swinney headed to 'Targeting Anonymous'

View All

“He’s been a sleaze ball. He’s been shady for a very, very long time,” Sharpe said on his FS1 show in September 2022. “Brett Favre is taking from the underserved.”

Meanwhile, Pat McAfee allegedly claimed Favre was “stealing from the poor people in Mississippi.” Still locked in a lawsuit with the Mississippi state department, Favre will have to face questioning over his knowledge of the welfare funds.

Yet, for now, Favre will await Sharpe’s reply to his brief in support of the original motion to dismiss the lawsuit. If Sharpe’s motion is accepted, the lawsuit ends. If not, the case will continue.