Whose at 125?

[James William]

Does the title annoy anyone else? I know I am being a Grammar Nazi, but it should be Who's not Whose....

Old age and too many meds.will do that!

 

[El_Jefe]

Does the title annoy anyone else? I know I am being a Grammar Nazi, but it should be Who's not Whose....

It's not wrong is we fill in the blank:
Whose _____ at 125?

Example: Whose legend killer at 125?

 

[82bordeaux]

Does the title annoy anyone else? I know I am being a Grammar Nazi, but it should be Who's not Whose....

Your right! Nothing irritates me more.

 

[86PSUPaul]

doesn’t bother me shouldn’t bother anyone thats not anal retentive

I have never been called that before, but you are welcome to your opinion.

BTW, it should be that's, not thats..... since it is a contraction of that is, kind of like the contraction of who is should be who's.

 

[86PSUPaul]

It's not wrong is we fill in the blank:
Whose _____ at 125?

Example: Whose legend killer at 125?

I don't think so, that is still a contraction of who is legend killer at 125

 

[El_Jefe]

I don't think so, that is still a contraction of who is legend killer at 125

OUR legend killer at 125!

(Maybe that was too easy?)

 

[Goosfraba]

I had heard rumblings before that he was receiving a Sunkist stipend. That would pretty much end his college career

Rumor has it the same administrator that worked on Wick's transfer credits is reviewing Suriano's financial/NIL issues. What is there to be concerned about?

PS - he is a tOSU alum

 

[NothingMeaningful]

I have never been called that before, but you are welcome to your opinion.

BTW, it should be that's, not thats..... since it is a contraction of that is, kind of like the contraction of who is should be who's.

Except that one should use "who" and not "that" when referring to people. So "who's" and not "thats" (or whatever).

 

[86PSUPaul]

Except that one should use "who" and not "that" when referring to people. So "who's" and not "thats" (or whatever).

True, I guess I was just being the Spelling Nazi there and not the Grammar Nazi! And I wanted to throw something back at the poster with his own words….

 

[amattaro]

 

[Honcho]

Yinz and all ur fancy grammar.

 

[crockster]

Drew Hildebrandt works for me.

 

[PSU Mike]

Except that one should use "who" and not "that" when referring to people. So "who's" and not "thats" (or whatever).

What if it’s ambiguous?

 

[82bordeaux]

What if it’s ambiguous?

 

[James William]

"who's not"

Wow,good thing I don't post often!

 

[NothingMeaningful]

What if it’s ambiguous?

Example?

 

[CropDuster507]

Whose on first

 

[86PSUPaul]

Whose on first

 

[McPat]

Happy to get NS or DH… but still very excited to see what Steen can do too. Maybe giving Steen a redshirt makes good sense, especially if we expect Howard to move to 133. Steen-Howard-Bartlett-SVN looks like a real solid future to me.

 

[johnstownsteel]

Anyone else think Steen will be a 133 before Robbie would be?

 

[82bordeaux]

Anyone else think Steen will be a 133 before Robbie would be?

Me.

 

[McPat]

Wow - really? Has Steen hit the weight room as hard as some have tweeted? Howard spent his last two years of high school at 126; Steen wrestled 120 last year. I thought Steen was viewed as a four year 125 lber.

 

[El_Jefe]

Wow - really? Has Steen hit the weight room as hard as some have tweeted? Howard spent his last two years of high school at 126; Steen wrestled 120 last year. I thought Steen was viewed as a four year 125 lber.

The coaches see Howard as a 4-yr 125. Steen slots nicely into the Conaway role.