If recently agreed to payments are deemed “athletic financial benefits” that exactly what current version of Title IX requires, or at least equal proportionate payments.thanks and I did not know CBA guaranteed that. It appears the narrative in the media is still the need to have anti-trust immunity. Also some kind of split of the revenue sports where players are employees and non-revenue sports. assumption is that the revenue employment model would eliminate any type of Title IX and only the non-revenue sports become Title IX managed. there is no financial way to pay backup womens LAX player the same as CFB QB.