“Penn State president pledges accountability, urges lawmakers to approve 2023-24 funding | Opinion” (Neeli opinion piece)

LBUfanatic

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
1,310
3,297
113
Thanks for the insight. Objectives 1 and 3 are measurable and within control of PSU. The second, matching majors, is problematic. PSU could offer what the legislature wants, and I imagine that it already does in a lot of cases. Getting students to enroll in them is another matter and beyond the control of the school.

Honestly, if this is an indication of what PSU has come to, Neels is in deep kimchi.
Yes, it’s not an ideal situation for university leadership, but the upside is that policymakers are now paying attention to the cost of tuition and trying to do something about it. It will be absolutely back breaking to try to unravel years of building a bloated administrative structure at PSU but it needs to start somewhere. Ironically, those same legislators will cry bloody murder if PSU tries to close a branch campus in their district.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Midnighter

TiogaLion

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2021
1,583
2,423
113
Here’s the $64 gazillion question. Wouldn’t performance against state goals mean we’d need a higher percentage of valuable graduates (preferably in-state?) to remain in the state after graduation, at least as the first-order effect? What power does the University hold in effecting that, vis a vis the rest of the state? Say Dear Old State raised the ranking of the undergrad programs by 20 notches. What return accrues to the state in that scenario? How does the answer vary if the same number stay in state after graduation, compared to if 5-10% fewer stay because the elevated status affords them more opportunities elsewhere? So in short, what performance matters? Until I see all the pieces laid out rationally this is just like watching old Miss America contests where every contestant wants to work for world peace, a cure for cancer, and every puppy born to have a lush acre to play on in the suburbs.
I've think you're on to something. A process of "loaning" money to students for specific colleges/majors and offering loan forgiveness similar to those that are offered to students who work for public entities could be worked out for those who live and work in PA. Lots of details would need to be worked out but it could be done. I also think you could leverage this type of package to attract the best and brightest high school students, particularly out-of-state students.. The number of years required to live and work in PA would have to carefully chosen in order to get benefits, but I think this would be successful.
 

Nitwit

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,481
2,224
113
I've think you're on to something. A process of "loaning" money to students for specific colleges/majors and offering loan forgiveness similar to those that are offered to students who work for public entities could be worked out for those who live and work in PA. Lots of details would need to be worked out but it could be done. I also think you could leverage this type of package to attract the best and brightest high school students, particularly out-of-state students.. The number of years required to live and work in PA would have to carefully chosen in order to get benefits, but I think this would be successful.
Many States already have programs similar to what you suggest but rather than loan forgiveness, they offer scholarships to, for example, the top 5% of high school grads to attend state universities (and you could add on major in high demand occupations). This wouldn’t help with respect to where they accept employment naturally but often employers locate where the talent is located, at least over the long term.
 

GrimReaper

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,872
113
I've think you're on to something. A process of "loaning" money to students for specific colleges/majors and offering loan forgiveness similar to those that are offered to students who work for public entities could be worked out for those who live and work in PA. Lots of details would need to be worked out but it could be done. I also think you could leverage this type of package to attract the best and brightest high school students, particularly out-of-state students.. The number of years required to live and work in PA would have to carefully chosen in order to get benefits, but I think this would be successful.
And the money from that comes from where? The state. It would have to be done for every state school. Carved out of PSU's appropriation? Don;t imagine the administration would be happy with that.
 

PSUFTG2

Well-known member
Jul 1, 2023
700
1,569
93
I would expect that this would go over more positively if we didn't gaslight so much:

C'est la vie
 

PSUFTG2

Well-known member
Jul 1, 2023
700
1,569
93
It is fiscal performance, not diversity and inclusion.
Read it again. It absolutely will include "DEIB"

No one knows what the final "dashboard" will look like, and where any emphasis may lie (my guess would be a heavy emphasis on the gaslighting, but time will tell) - but dollars-to-dimes DEIB metrics will be a significant component.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobPSU92

LBUfanatic

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
1,310
3,297
113
Read it again. It absolutely will include "DEIB"

No one knows what the final "dashboard" will look like, and where any emphasis may lie (my guess would be a heavy emphasis on the gaslighting, but time will tell) - but dollars-to-dimes DEIB metrics will be a significant component.
Those are the metrics Neely mentions have been put in place in other states and are part of the model she is proposing. What I am saying is that the controller of the money — the Pennsylvania General Assembly — is most concerned about fiscal responsibility and controlling tuition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSUFTG2

Nitwit

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,481
2,224
113
Read it again. It absolutely will include "DEIB"

No one knows what the final "dashboard" will look like, and where any emphasis may lie (my guess would be a heavy emphasis on the gaslighting, but time will tell) - but dollars-to-dimes DEIB metrics will be a significant component.
Are you implying it shouldn’t be? Take a position.
 

PSUFTG2

Well-known member
Jul 1, 2023
700
1,569
93
Those are the metrics Neely mentions have been put in place in other states and are part of the model she is proposing. What I am saying is that the controller of the money — the Pennsylvania General Assembly — is most concerned about fiscal responsibility and controlling tuition.
(y)

Though, personally, I wouldn't even want to venture a guess as to what the folks in Harrisburg are most concerned about (and there may not be a consensus). I would hope a significant emphasis would be on the items you mention (and I think it should be, and maybe it is) - but I would hesitate before betting the mortgage money on it.
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,591
26,591
113
All Penn Staters encouraged to speak up in support of University's state funding

”UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — Penn State’s Office of Government and Community Relations is encouraging all Penn Staters to speak up and voice support Penn State’s 2023-24 state appropriation, which is now more than three months past due.

The advocacy campaign through Advocate Penn State urges support for the 7.1% funding increase proposed by Gov. Josh Shapiro in his inaugural budget. The increase would be Penn State’s first increase in state funding since a 2% bump in 2019-20.

All Penn Staters are encouraged to go to advocate.psu.edu to participate in the most recent advocacy campaign to show support for state funding, which allows the University to offer a significant in-state tuition discount to more than 42,000 Pennsylvania resident Penn State students.

Advocate now!


 

GrimReaper

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,872
113
All Penn Staters encouraged to speak up in support of University's state funding

”UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — Penn State’s Office of Government and Community Relations is encouraging all Penn Staters to speak up and voice support Penn State’s 2023-24 state appropriation, which is now more than three months past due.

The advocacy campaign through Advocate Penn State urges support for the 7.1% funding increase proposed by Gov. Josh Shapiro in his inaugural budget. The increase would be Penn State’s first increase in state funding since a 2% bump in 2019-20.

All Penn Staters are encouraged to go to advocate.psu.edu to participate in the most recent advocacy campaign to show support for state funding, which allows the University to offer a significant in-state tuition discount to more than 42,000 Pennsylvania resident Penn State students.

Advocate now!


That effort was launched a while ago. Either PSU didn't get the response it hoped for or it ain't working.
 

UncleRoyBiggins

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
241
636
93
Rut roh, we know we happened last time the PSU President went after legislators for more money. I am scared. Another scandal coming to burn PSU to the ground....
Honestly though, we deserve to be burned down again. The football team is winning too many games, the basketball team is starting to be competitive. I hate us.
So our bloated fiscally irresponsible government is going to have oversight over our bloated irresponsible university and hold them accountable.
We are going to cut costs and people but we need people and money to do that.
View attachment 416333
Of course! Nothing bad can happen with that.
 

ApexLion

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
4,057
6,973
113
It has ceased to be a state university. That is the issue. Start there and then look at the issues facing this university. At 39 percent from out of state/international at University Park, it’s clear that we tied the university to out of state tuition while asking the PA legislature for more money. Here at UNC, the school has 16,500 undergrads and it’s a state mandated population that cannot go below a 81% in-state student population. Contrast that with the bloat and quiet corruption at PSU not to mention tuition at 2x or more than UNC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Keyser Soze 16802

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,591
26,591
113
It has ceased to be a state university. That is the issue. Start there and then look at the issues facing this university. At 39 percent from out of state/international at University Park, it’s clear that we tied the university to out of state tuition while asking the PA legislature for more money. Here at UNC, the school has 16,500 undergrads and it’s a state mandated population that cannot go below a 81% in-state student population. Contrast that with the bloat and quiet corruption at PSU not to mention tuition at 2x or more than UNC.

OBVIOUSLY. o_O , unc does not share PSU’s commitment to DEIB. Therefore, PSU laughs at unc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ApexLion

Keyser Soze 16802

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
860
1,831
93
It has ceased to be a state university. That is the issue. Start there and then look at the issues facing this university. At 39 percent from out of state/international at University Park, it’s clear that we tied the university to out of state tuition while asking the PA legislature for more money. Here at UNC, the school has 16,500 undergrads and it’s a state mandated population that cannot go below a 81% in-state student population. Contrast that with the bloat and quiet corruption at PSU not to mention tuition at 2x or more than UNC.
Spot on, sir. Sadly the PSU apologists on here won't acknowledge these facts, they just expect the state to write bigger checks.
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,591
26,591
113
Spot on, sir. Sadly the PSU apologists on here won't acknowledge these facts, they just expect the state to write bigger checks.

PSU is state-related. I don’t know if that limits PA’s oversight. Does PA mandate a percentage in-state student population for schools in the state system?
 
Last edited:

GrimReaper

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,872
113
PSU is state-related. I don’t know if that limits PA’s oversight. Does PA a mandate a percentage in-state student population for schools in the state system?
Yes, being a "state-related" does limit the amount of control the Commonwealth exercises over PSU. How that differs from a state (owned) school is complicated and varies from state to state. Basically, if Harrisburg wants something from PSU (control, information, etc). and PSU doesn't want to provide it, it can tell Harrisburg to pound sand (which it has done). The only leverage Harrisburg has is the amount of the state appropriation and so we find ourselves where we are.
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,591
26,591
113
Yes, being a "state-related" does limit the amount of control the Commonwealth exercises over PSU. How that differs from a state (owned) school is complicated and varies from state to state. Basically, if Harrisburg wants something from PSU (control, information, etc). and PSU doesn't want to provide it, it can tell Harrisburg to pound sand (which it has done). The only leverage Harrisburg has is the amount of the state appropriation and so we find ourselves where we are.

I figured as much. Penn State needs that wiggle room. o_O

Presumably, schools in the state systems can’t wiggle.
 

ApexLion

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
4,057
6,973
113
OBVIOUSLY. o_O , unc does not share PSU’s commitment to DEIB. Therefore, PSU laughs at unc.
The People's Republic of Chapel Hill laughs at PSU's DEIB press releases. Trust me. We have a little petrie dish down here where we continually try social engineering each week. While a nuisance, its tried with less bluster and press releases than Neeli's regime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobPSU92
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login