Too many passes to the guy with three white jerseys within ten feet of him.Final: 0-0
Great effort by the USA. They had a lot of opportunities, but couldn't get a goal. England was on their heels for a good bit of the 2nd half, but nearly scored in stoppage time.
Nice match.
Maguire played really well for England.Tyler Adams was my MVP of the match for the USA.
Right now it’s England 4, Iran 3, US 2, Wales 1. A tie would give us 3 points, Iran 4. We need a win. Fixed.can we advance with a tie or do we need the win?
can we advance with a tie or do we need the win?
Iran only has 3: win over Wales and loss to EnglandRight now it’s England 4, Iran 4, US 2, Wales 1. A tie would give us 3 points. We need a win.
Right now it’s England 4, Iran 4, US 2, Wales 1. A tie would give us 3 points. We need a win.
If Wales beats England and Iran draws then England, Wales, Iran would each have four points. Goal differential is the first tiebreak. Wales and Iran are both -2 GD. If Wales wins they will be -1 GD at worst, and if Iran ties they’d still be at -2, so Wales would get in over Iran. England is at +4 at the moment.Iran advances with a draw. Expect a game of keep away and taking dives. Going to be frustrating to watch
Iran advances with a draw. Expect a game of keep away and taking dives. Going to be frustrating to watch
Yes, this is one thing that could work in our favor because if Wales is winning, Iran can’t park the bus and settle on a draw if the score is tied.If Wales beats England and Iran draws then England, Wales, Iran would each have four points. Goal differential is the first tiebreak. Wales and Iran are both -2 GD. If Wales wins they will be -1 GD at worst, and if Iran ties they’d still be at -2, so Wales would get in over Iran. England is at +4 at the moment.
Once (if?) the US scores, the tactics will change and really open up the game.Some thoughts:
- a draw is a fear on a couple of levels:
1) The USA has played really well from their goal to the opposing penalty area, but has had trouble scoring
2) the Iran that bested Wales was much better than the Iran that lost decisively to England
- keep away and dives:
1) Iran advances with a tie, so it's to their advantage to play defensive
2) dives or embellishments happen in almost any soccer game. Most good refs (and so far most of the reffing in the WC has been excellent) can see through that and not award diving or embellishing
- going to be frustrating to watch:
1) perhaps; hard to know for sure
2) if the US ties or loses, it will be very frustrating
3) if the US wins, it won't be so frustrating
4) other than the offensive challenges mentioned above, I think the USA is the bette team (between Iran and USA), and as such expect to be watching a USA victory
Kane was neutralized for 80+ minutes of the game.
I was pretty damn impressed with the US effort.
I’m there with you. Not a soccer fan at all but if you put a USA jersey on in a tournament I’ll root for you.Reason #34 or so I've been unable to get into soccer, even though I've tried over and over again ...
The ESPN headline following the US-England match was "USMNT Dominant in Draw against England."
My tiny little 'Murican brain just can't find a way to process "dominance" and a draw being written to describe one another.
no, I haven't a clue.
Are you not seeing the tweets? Or are you not seeing anything in the post? Since you quoted part of a post, I'm guessing it's just the tweets.
Another low scoring affair. Props to Massimo Manca II.Final: 0-0
Great effort by the USA. They had a lot of opportunities, but couldn't get a goal. England was on their heels for a good bit of the 2nd half, but nearly scored in stoppage time.
Nice match.
That’s because you aren’t the sharpest tool in the shed.Reason #34 or so I've been unable to get into soccer, even though I've tried over and over again ...
The ESPN headline following the US-England match was "USMNT Dominant in Draw against England."
My tiny little 'Murican brain just can't find a way to process "dominance" and a draw being written to describe one another.
They need to start scoring soccer like horse shoes, if it’s close you get a point, if it hits the bar, you get two, if it goes in you get three. I mean the game highlights are near misses, so give them some points for them.I’m there with you. Not a soccer fan at all but if you put a USA jersey on in a tournament I’ll root for you.
I know England was the definite favorite,(heavy favorite?), and so a tie is generally good since most thought they’d lose. But, it’s very odd to hear people classifying a scoreless tie as ‘brilliant and dominant’.
Yeah, cause England was so dominant in their game against the USA. smh
Would USA be favored given the results against a common opponent (Wales)?