Beamer is right about one thing

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,246
2,815
113
That is the point....what he did wasn't wrong! So he did what he was taught and horrible officiating took over!

It wasn't wrong years ago. Qb's are protected more now.

But the refs conspiring against us does sound a lot better.
 

kidrobinski

Active member
Jan 30, 2022
405
407
63
It wasn't wrong years ago. Qb's are protected more now.

But the refs conspiring against us does sound a lot better.
So a qb that throws a pick can make a tackle but a defender has to be gentle with how he keeps the qb from doing so.

South Carolina is not a national ‘brand’ as is LSU. The brands will get and have always gotten the benefit of the doubt; such is life. The officials don’t conspire, they mostly take the safer route.
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,246
2,815
113
So a qb that throws a pick can make a tackle but a defender has to be gentle with how he keeps the qb from doing so.

South Carolina is not a national ‘brand’ as is LSU. The brands will get and have always gotten the benefit of the doubt; such is life. The officials don’t conspire, they mostly take the safer route.

Would he have been flagged if the qb was anywhere near making a tackle while he blocked him?

I get favoritism, and I agree a lot of times.
 

uscjunkie

Active member
Jan 27, 2022
504
335
63
Possibly. But that brings up a counterpoint. If he was no where close to being near a tackle, why lay him out?

And then we're at the totally subjective argument of whether they "laid the qb out" or how hard they hit him.
You are going off hindsight. How does Kinard know that maybe the ball carrier doesn't cut back or do any number of things. He can't predict the future. He was 100% right to block him! Not his fault the LSU QB was a flopping girl!
 

PD-Cock

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2022
2,658
5,667
113
That 4th down & short call during Outback bowl has to rank as top 3 in all time bogus calls in history of college football. Ref called 1st down when clearly we held them, everyone on the planet could see due to TV being zoomed into the ball short of the marker but, the ref, standing over the chain insisted 1st down. At that moment, OBC was at his best! Visor went sailing.
Overruled & we got the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boduke

KOTR

Joined Dec 1, 2019
Jan 19, 2022
192
243
43
That 4th down & short call during Outback bowl has to rank as top 3 in all time bogus calls in history of college football. Ref called 1st down when clearly we held them, everyone on the planet could see due to TV being zoomed into the ball short of the marker but, the ref, standing over the chain insisted 1st down. At that moment, OBC was at his best! Visor went sailing.
Overruled & we got the ball.
If you're talking about against Michigan, it wasn't overruled. They kept the ball. Clowney took it back in the next play.
 

Gamecock Jacque

Joined Dec 20, 2020
Jan 30, 2022
3,911
4,011
113
If you're talking about against Michigan, it wasn't overruled. They kept the ball. Clowney took it back in the next play.
That game was the first and only game where I saw officials cover their mouths when talking with each other like baseball players.
 

Piscis

Active member
Aug 31, 2024
307
309
63
The ‘horse collar’ was right in front of me, was most definitely jersey; that was a poor poor call and set the tone for the rest of the game.

The defensive change was a puzzler for sure, and frustrating to watch the results.
"Horse collar" is any tackle that pulls a player with the ball down from behind. It doesn't have to be grabbing the shoulder pads, the jersey counts too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123

Piscis

Active member
Aug 31, 2024
307
309
63
The jersey counting is a new, recent modification. But it does exist.
I've seen it called a lot. If a defender grabs a runner's jersey anywhere above the numbers from behind and tackles him if is going to be called a horse collar tackle.
 

Gamecock Jacque

Joined Dec 20, 2020
Jan 30, 2022
3,911
4,011
113
I've seen it called a lot. If a defender grabs a runner's jersey anywhere above the numbers from behind and tackles him if is going to be called a horse collar tackle.
It looked to me live like he grabbed his sleeve. I haven't been able to allow myself to rewatch the game yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bayrooster

bayrooster

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
1,914
1,441
113
I've seen it called a lot. If a defender grabs a runner's jersey anywhere above the numbers from behind and tackles him if is going to be called a horse collar tackle.
Someone posted the rule above -- it's actually more specific than that.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
13,073
11,161
113
Someone posted the rule above -- it's actually more specific than that.

By definition, it was not horse collar, as it as not inside the collar. However, live action, a ref is going to call that every time because it's too hard to tell.

Would be good to have instant replay available for plays like that.
 

FootballLVR

Member
Sep 25, 2023
313
197
43
You don't understand football. Beamer said himself that they teach to find the QB first after an interception. Sounds to me he did EXACTLY what he was taught to do!
If he was taught to do that then we are in for more penalties of the type in the future. It was a stupid move.

JF
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123

uscfan1981

Joined May 1, 2006
Feb 7, 2022
99
95
18
Thing for me is it was totally unnecessary. The play was already heading the other way and the QB was a non-factor. Lenard came back to push him from behind.

I've seen it called a lot. If a defender grabs a runner's jersey anywhere above the numbers from behind and tackles him if is going to be called a horse collar tackle.
Yes. And strictly speaking the call was correct. However, the intent was/is to prevent a whiplash effect to prevent neck injury. On that particular play he grabbed the jersey in the shoulder area. No risk of injury. I'd guess it isn't called more than 50% of the time. If it wasn't a pick 6 or if LSU did it to us, do you think they still throw the flag? I don't.
 

Slim Chickens Gamecock

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2022
1,304
1,599
113
The ‘horse collar’ was right in front of me, was most definitely jersey; that was a poor poor call and set the tone for the rest of the game.

The defensive change was a puzzler for sure, and frustrating to watch the results.
Is it not a penalty if it is just Jersey?
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
13,073
11,161
113
Yeah I saw it answered after I posted. Thanks 181

This is where quick consult with a review official would help. It wouldn't take 20 seconds to radio up and say "can you confirm a horse collar on ______" and get the result back. Then they can just say "There is no penalty for horse collar on the previous play. The defender did not grab inside the collar."
 
  • Like
Reactions: will110

80and90gcock

Joined Nov 20, 2003 • Garnet Trust Supporter
Jan 31, 2022
1,352
3,813
113
You can't have 13 penalties in a game and expect to win.

The horse collar call was absolutely correct. The hit on the qb was totally unnecessary and Kennard knew he had screwed up when he did it.

Keep in mind, Carolina still had the lead and the ball relatively late in the fourth after the roughing the passer call. LSU drove the field and scored a td. If the offense manages a couple first downs I doubt LSU has time to drive the field and score a td.

Blaming the officials for a loss is loser mentality.
BS!!! Saturday's game was not played in the vacuum that you conveniently created for this troll post. We did "manage" to get some huge first downs, many of which were called back, not the least of which was an OPI that cost us 57 yards of field position. Your "loser mentality" comment is a slap in the face of everyone, including the fans who put their effort, heart and soul into that game. Screw you and your condescending BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: will110

will110

Joined Aug 17, 2018
Jan 20, 2022
8,972
23,883
113
BS!!! Saturday's game was not played in the vacuum that you conveniently created for this troll post. We did "manage" to get some huge first downs, many of which were called back, not the least of which was an OPI that cost us 57 yards of field position. Your "loser mentality" comment is a slap in the face of everyone, including the fans who put their effort, heart and soul into that game. Screw you and your condescending BS.
I'm really questioning if this guy is actually a Gamecock fan after seeing his posts after he joined the board a few weeks ago.
 

kidrobinski

Active member
Jan 30, 2022
405
407
63
If he was taught to do that then we are in for more penalties of the type in the future. It was a stupid move.

JF
My friend you are taught from beginner football in the event of a play resulting in a change of possession to put the qb on the ground. He learned that long before Beamer.
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,246
2,815
113
This is where quick consult with a review official would help. It wouldn't take 20 seconds to radio up and say "can you confirm a horse collar on ______" and get the result back. Then they can just say "There is no penalty for horse collar on the previous play. The defender did not grab inside the collar."

Wait, what?



For all of its existence, the rule has made it a penalty to reach inside the back of player’s jersey and yank him to the ground. Now, players also aren’t allowed to grab the outside of the jersey and pull the player down. The foul doesn’t require the tackler’s hand to slide inside the jersey and onto the bare shoulder pads of his opponent.
 

PrestonyteParrot

Well-known member
May 28, 2024
873
844
93
Wait, what?



For all of its existence, the rule has made it a penalty to reach inside the back of player’s jersey and yank him to the ground. Now, players also aren’t allowed to grab the outside of the jersey and pull the player down. The foul doesn’t require the tackler’s hand to slide inside the jersey and onto the bare shoulder pads of his opponent.

So, if you grab a runner's hanging jersey who is running by you at the bottom to pull him back for the tackle, it is a penalty?
Can't push the QB, can't grab the jersey at all - next thing you know defenders will be required to have their hands wrapped in tape like useless nubs. Football is becoming sissified.
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,246
2,815
113
So, if you grab a runner's hanging jersey who is running by you at the bottom to pull him back for the tackle, it is a penalty?
Can't push the QB, can't grab the jersey at all - next thing you know defenders will be required to have their hands wrapped in tape like useless nubs. Football is becoming sissified.

From the link:

There, the defender reaches inside the runner’s uniform. That’s still a foul. But starting this season, it’s also a foul if he grabs the runner around the nameplate and hauls him down that way. That’s what the rule means by including “the area.”

I'm no expert, but it sounds like they mean a jersey grab up by the shoulder area.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PrestonyteParrot

uscjunkie

Active member
Jan 27, 2022
504
335
63
BS!!! Saturday's game was not played in the vacuum that you conveniently created for this troll post. We did "manage" to get some huge first downs, many of which were called back, not the least of which was an OPI that cost us 57 yards of field position. Your "loser mentality" comment is a slap in the face of everyone, including the fans who put their effort, heart and soul into that game. Screw you and your condescending BS.
AMEN!!
 

Latest posts

Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login