Big Week in MS Legislature. Alcohol Modernization

Spotdawg

Member
Feb 15, 2007
606
46
28
This initiative didn't suddenly appear from the blue. Think citically for a moment-who is most likely to benefit from this state wide declaration of all counties "wet"? Were current liquor outlets approached by lawmakers as to what their needs were? If they needed to be open for spirits sales 7 days a week? (most stores are family owned and are all for a day of rest.) Hmmm, looks to me like the major grocer/ big box retailers might reap the benefit of this bill. When Kroger and Walmart get wine in grocery ....ooops, I didn't mean to spill those beans quite yet, they will need all counties to be wet in order to engage all stores. And Sunday sales? Just another day for retail overlords.

Anytime you see any kind of alcohol initiative put before the Ms Legislature, know in your mind the lobby for Walmart and Kroger concieved, manipulated and bought it into being...and to their sole benefit.

Mississippi is being led around by the nose. Corporate grocery will have their way in the next few years and wine will be next to the produce section at your favorite market. No problem with new players, but I do object to graft and corruption utilized to get those results.
 

Spotdawg

Member
Feb 15, 2007
606
46
28
This proposal is not about ordering wine from out of state. Al for that! Look towards the bottom of the petition. It's about 7 days a week sales, state wide wet desigation and delivery of alcohol by third party.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,460
3,378
113
@Spotdawg really seems to think this is for the benefit of big business.
Yeah, they may benefit, but if consumers want it...then consumers benefit.

These things are allowed to be complex and benefit multiple groups.

As for his complaint that soon there will be wine next to produce...I don't even understand why that's a complaint. Why would anyone care where wine is located within a grocery store? Put it next to the pharmacy, or the aisle with baby formula and incontinence diapers, or the frozen foods.
Wherever the store thinks things will sell best. It's just wine.
 

Spotdawg

Member
Feb 15, 2007
606
46
28
In principle I agree. It is about the benefit of all. However, the great state of MS has abided by a set of agreements with higly regulated alcohol outlets since inception. One permit allowed per person/family, no items allowed in liquor stores that grocery already carries (can't sell beer, fresh fruit, portable glassware or even margarita salt until recently) Now the inclination all of a sudden to allow ownership of multiple permits, Sunday sales and a "have at it" attitude. They have pulled the rug from a lot of families who have invested in the industry and believed the State.

In full transparency, I am not involved with ownership of any alcohol outlet, I am involved in distribution and would stand to benefit from wider rules for sales. I would certainly order from out of state wine sources. I've seen the insides of the beast and do not trust the animal for a moment. When I suggest that a certain lobbyist group has unfair sway...
 

ZombieKissinger

Well-known member
May 29, 2013
3,240
3,950
113
Wait, you can’t buy wine in grocery stores in Mississippi? It’s been a while since I’ve been in one but hahahahaha
 

PhiDawg

Member
Aug 2, 2023
85
88
18
This initiative didn't suddenly appear from the blue. Think citically for a moment-who is most likely to benefit from this state wide declaration of all counties "wet"? Were current liquor outlets approached by lawmakers as to what their needs were? If they needed to be open for spirits sales 7 days a week? (most stores are family owned and are all for a day of rest.) Hmmm, looks to me like the major grocer/ big box retailers might reap the benefit of this bill. When Kroger and Walmart get wine in grocery ....ooops, I didn't mean to spill those beans quite yet, they will need all counties to be wet in order to engage all stores. And Sunday sales? Just another day for retail overlords.

Anytime you see any kind of alcohol initiative put before the Ms Legislature, know in your mind the lobby for Walmart and Kroger concieved, manipulated and bought it into being...and to their sole benefit.

Mississippi is being led around by the nose. Corporate grocery will have their way in the next few years and wine will be next to the produce section at your favorite market. No problem with new players, but I do object to graft and corruption utilized to get those results.
Wait, you can’t buy wine in grocery stores in Mississippi? It’s been a while since I’ve been in one but hahahahaha

Thanks for the bumps everyone. If you want better access, email your lawmakers.
 

Villagedawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
862
503
93
In principle I agree. It is about the benefit of all. However, the great state of MS has abided by a set of agreements with higly regulated alcohol outlets since inception. One permit allowed per person/family, no items allowed in liquor stores that grocery already carries (can't sell beer, fresh fruit, portable glassware or even margarita salt until recently) Now the inclination all of a sudden to allow ownership of multiple permits, Sunday sales and a "have at it" attitude. They have pulled the rug from a lot of families who have invested in the industry and believed the State.

In full transparency, I am not involved with ownership of any alcohol outlet, I am involved in distribution and would stand to benefit from wider rules for sales. I would certainly order from out of state wine sources. I've seen the insides of the beast and do not trust the animal for a moment. When I suggest that a certain lobbyist group has unfair sway...
Pretty soon you're going to be telling us big corporations and lobbyists run this country! Surely not!********
 

The Cooterpoot

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
4,161
6,752
113
This initiative didn't suddenly appear from the blue. Think citically for a moment-who is most likely to benefit from this state wide declaration of all counties "wet"? Were current liquor outlets approached by lawmakers as to what their needs were? If they needed to be open for spirits sales 7 days a week? (most stores are family owned and are all for a day of rest.) Hmmm, looks to me like the major grocer/ big box retailers might reap the benefit of this bill. When Kroger and Walmart get wine in grocery ....ooops, I didn't mean to spill those beans quite yet, they will need all counties to be wet in order to engage all stores. And Sunday sales? Just another day for retail overlords.

Anytime you see any kind of alcohol initiative put before the Ms Legislature, know in your mind the lobby for Walmart and Kroger concieved, manipulated and bought it into being...and to their sole benefit.
Mississippi is being led around by the nose. Corporate grocery will have their way in the next few years and wine will be next to the produce section at your favorite market. No problem with new players, but I do object to graft and corruption utilized to get those results.
Who cares? I want to be able to order specialty stuff I can't get in MS because the state limits things so much. The grocery store won't have those. And on other stuff, the more places available, the cheaper it will be (liquor prices have gone as high or higher than groceries). I didn't realize we should pay more to protect little liquor stores who only carry Hennessy and Mad Dog.
And we're already at statewide wet status. That went through a couple weeks ago.
 

Cow College

Member
Aug 21, 2012
716
23
18
This initiative didn't suddenly appear from the blue. Think citically for a moment-who is most likely to benefit from this state wide declaration of all counties "wet"? Were current liquor outlets approached by lawmakers as to what their needs were? If they needed to be open for spirits sales 7 days a week? (most stores are family owned and are all for a day of rest.) Hmmm, looks to me like the major grocer/ big box retailers might reap the benefit of this bill. When Kroger and Walmart get wine in grocery ....ooops, I didn't mean to spill those beans quite yet, they will need all counties to be wet in order to engage all stores. And Sunday sales? Just another day for retail overlords.

Anytime you see any kind of alcohol initiative put before the Ms Legislature, know in your mind the lobby for Walmart and Kroger concieved, manipulated and bought it into being...and to their sole benefit.

Mississippi is being led around by the nose. Corporate grocery will have their way in the next few years and wine will be next to the produce section at your favorite market. No problem with new players, but I do object to graft and corruption utilized to get those results.
Serious question. Why should I not be able to buy liquor or wine on Sunday?
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,220
2,446
113
This initiative didn't suddenly appear from the blue. Think citically for a moment-who is most likely to benefit from this state wide declaration of all counties "wet"? Were current liquor outlets approached by lawmakers as to what their needs were? If they needed to be open for spirits sales 7 days a week? (most stores are family owned and are all for a day of rest.) Hmmm, looks to me like the major grocer/ big box retailers might reap the benefit of this bill. When Kroger and Walmart get wine in grocery ....ooops, I didn't mean to spill those beans quite yet, they will need all counties to be wet in order to engage all stores. And Sunday sales? Just another day for retail overlords.

Anytime you see any kind of alcohol initiative put before the Ms Legislature, know in your mind the lobby for Walmart and Kroger concieved, manipulated and bought it into being...and to their sole benefit.

Mississippi is being led around by the nose. Corporate grocery will have their way in the next few years and wine will be next to the produce section at your favorite market. No problem with new players, but I do object to graft and corruption utilized to get those results.

There are plenty of consumers that want wine and liquor in their grocery store and want to be able to buy liquor for off premises consumption 7 days a week. And while I am sympathetic to retailers wanting the state to enforce an agreement where everybody closes on Sunday, there is no reason for alcohol to be singled out for that. You want to shut down all retail on Sundays across the state, I think that would kind of suck but it would give everybody a day of rest. You are just arguing for economic protectionism to protect some business owners at the expense of consumers.

In principle I agree. It is about the benefit of all. However, the great state of MS has abided by a set of agreements with higly regulated alcohol outlets since inception. One permit allowed per person/family, no items allowed in liquor stores that grocery already carries (can't sell beer, fresh fruit, portable glassware or even margarita salt until recently) Now the inclination all of a sudden to allow ownership of multiple permits, Sunday sales and a "have at it" attitude. They have pulled the rug from a lot of families who have invested in the industry and believed the State.

In full transparency, I am not involved with ownership of any alcohol outlet, I am involved in distribution and would stand to benefit from wider rules for sales. I would certainly order from out of state wine sources. I've seen the insides of the beast and do not trust the animal for a moment. When I suggest that a certain lobbyist group has unfair sway...
I am sympathetic to the people that have invested in liquor stores. Regulatory certainty is generally a good thing, so I think a good compromise would be to immediately let liquor stores sell what they want to (may have to pair this with a provision stating they can't change locations or expand their premises) and set all other restrictions to sunset in 5 years. If you've invested in the last 5 years, you've done it with this type of change being discussed, so nobody is getting caught with their pants down.
 

QuadrupleOption

Well-known member
Aug 21, 2012
1,012
804
93
This initiative didn't suddenly appear from the blue. Think citically for a moment-who is most likely to benefit from this state wide declaration of all counties "wet"? Were current liquor outlets approached by lawmakers as to what their needs were? If they needed to be open for spirits sales 7 days a week? (most stores are family owned and are all for a day of rest.) Hmmm, looks to me like the major grocer/ big box retailers might reap the benefit of this bill. When Kroger and Walmart get wine in grocery ....ooops, I didn't mean to spill those beans quite yet, they will need all counties to be wet in order to engage all stores. And Sunday sales? Just another day for retail overlords.

Anytime you see any kind of alcohol initiative put before the Ms Legislature, know in your mind the lobby for Walmart and Kroger concieved, manipulated and bought it into being...and to their sole benefit.

Mississippi is being led around by the nose. Corporate grocery will have their way in the next few years and wine will be next to the produce section at your favorite market. No problem with new players, but I do object to graft and corruption utilized to get those results.
My local Kroger already sells beer. Why would selling wine be a problem?
 

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,063
5,065
113
This initiative didn't suddenly appear from the blue. Think citically for a moment-who is most likely to benefit from this state wide declaration of all counties "wet"? Were current liquor outlets approached by lawmakers as to what their needs were? If they needed to be open for spirits sales 7 days a week? (most stores are family owned and are all for a day of rest.) Hmmm, looks to me like the major grocer/ big box retailers might reap the benefit of this bill. When Kroger and Walmart get wine in grocery ....ooops, I didn't mean to spill those beans quite yet, they will need all counties to be wet in order to engage all stores. And Sunday sales? Just another day for retail overlords.

Anytime you see any kind of alcohol initiative put before the Ms Legislature, know in your mind the lobby for Walmart and Kroger concieved, manipulated and bought it into being...and to their sole benefit.

Mississippi is being led around by the nose. Corporate grocery will have their way in the next few years and wine will be next to the produce section at your favorite market. No problem with new players, but I do object to graft and corruption utilized to get those results.
Every place I've been with wine in grocery stores has had seemingly successful private liquor stores as well. I think they can coexist. Honestly, with Costco and Sam's already selling 6 days a week, I can't imagine much impact on liquor stores, but there may be some smaller town nuance that makes if bad for those.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peewee.sixpack

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,063
5,065
113
@Spotdawg really seems to think this is for the benefit of big business.
Yeah, they may benefit, but if consumers want it...then consumers benefit.

These things are allowed to be complex and benefit multiple groups.

As for his complaint that soon there will be wine next to produce...I don't even understand why that's a complaint. Why would anyone care where wine is located within a grocery store? Put it next to the pharmacy, or the aisle with baby formula and incontinence diapers, or the frozen foods.
Wherever the store thinks things will sell best. It's just wine.
Grapes by grapes. It just makes common sense.
 

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,063
5,065
113
In principle I agree. It is about the benefit of all. However, the great state of MS has abided by a set of agreements with higly regulated alcohol outlets since inception. One permit allowed per person/family, no items allowed in liquor stores that grocery already carries (can't sell beer, fresh fruit, portable glassware or even margarita salt until recently) Now the inclination all of a sudden to allow ownership of multiple permits, Sunday sales and a "have at it" attitude. They have pulled the rug from a lot of families who have invested in the industry and believed the State.

In full transparency, I am not involved with ownership of any alcohol outlet, I am involved in distribution and would stand to benefit from wider rules for sales. I would certainly order from out of state wine sources. I've seen the insides of the beast and do not trust the animal for a moment. When I suggest that a certain lobbyist group has unfair sway...
Well that's your problem...trying to bring an informed opinion to SPS.***
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Dawgg and MSUDOG24

PhiDawg

Member
Aug 2, 2023
85
88
18
There are plenty of consumers that want wine and liquor in their grocery store and want to be able to buy liquor for off premises consumption 7 days a week. And while I am sympathetic to retailers wanting the state to enforce an agreement where everybody closes on Sunday, there is no reason for alcohol to be singled out for that. You want to shut down all retail on Sundays across the state, I think that would kind of suck but it would give everybody a day of rest. You are just arguing for economic protectionism to protect some business owners at the expense of consumers.


I am sympathetic to the people that have invested in liquor stores. Regulatory certainty is generally a good thing, so I think a good compromise would be to immediately let liquor stores sell what they want to (may have to pair this with a provision stating they can't change locations or expand their premises) and set all other restrictions to sunset in 5 years. If you've invested in the last 5 years, you've done it with this type of change being discussed, so nobody is getting caught with their pants down.
Retailers, who ***** about being open for biz on Sun, will willfully open for biz at 10am Mon and never see customer #1 for 5-6 hours. Talk about losing $.
 

The Peeper

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2008
12,081
5,292
113
Serious question. Why should I not be able to buy liquor or wine on Sunday?
Colin Jost Snl GIF by Saturday Night Live
Oh No Wtf GIF by LilLetsOfficial



redd foxx bat GIF
redd foxx bat GIF
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,220
2,446
113
Every place I've been with wine in grocery stores has had seemingly successful private liquor stores as well. I think they can coexist. Honestly, with Costco and Sam's already selling 6 days a week, I can't imagine much impact on liquor stores, but there may be some smaller town nuance that makes if bad for those.
I think shifting a bunch of wine sales revenue from liquor stores to grocery stores will presumably result in fewer liquor stores. Shelf space is precious in grocery stores, so I could see grocery stores only focusing on low and mid tier wines and winning on price and the liquor stores losing that revenue making it hard for them to keep better wines in stock. And some items that you can no get in grocery stores are going to stop being carried or carried with a much smaller selection.

But generally, it's a big deal to liquor store owners and not a big deal to anybody else. But the liquor store owners are very motivated and most people don't care that much, and the liquor store owners can form the traditional Bootleggers and Baptist coalition so they have been able to maintain the anti-consumer legislation that exists. The only reason they might lose now is that consumers interests happen to line up with what the big grocers and warehouse chains want.
 

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,063
5,065
113
I think shifting a bunch of wine sales revenue from liquor stores to grocery stores will presumably result in fewer liquor stores. Shelf space is precious in grocery stores, so I could see grocery stores only focusing on low and mid tier wines and winning on price and the liquor stores losing that revenue making it hard for them to keep better wines in stock. And some items that you can no get in grocery stores are going to stop being carried or carried with a much smaller selection.

But generally, it's a big deal to liquor store owners and not a big deal to anybody else. But the liquor store owners are very motivated and most people don't care that much, and the liquor store owners can form the traditional Bootleggers and Baptist coalition so they have been able to maintain the anti-consumer legislation that exists. The only reason they might lose now is that consumers interests happen to line up with what the big grocers and warehouse chains want.
I'd just like to be able to order wine occasionally when I see something unique out there...
 
  • Like
Reactions: dorndawg

ETK99

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2019
4,973
6,656
112
Another stupid *** law is the "can't be within a certain distance of a church" law. Baptists are forced to drive great distance in disguise due this law. Imagine who they could drink if they could order off the internet so they don't have to worry about being seen at the liquor store too.
 

eckie1

Well-known member
Jun 23, 2007
3,241
2,377
113
Another stupid *** law is the "can't be within a certain distance of a church" law. Baptists are forced to drive great distance in disguise due this law. Imagine who they could drink if they could order off the internet so they don't have to worry about being seen at the liquor store too.
The biggest difference between the Catholics and the Baptists is that the Catholics say hello when they see you in the liquor store.
 

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,200
2,509
113
I think shifting a bunch of wine sales revenue from liquor stores to grocery stores will presumably result in fewer liquor stores. Shelf space is precious in grocery stores, so I could see grocery stores only focusing on low and mid tier wines and winning on price and the liquor stores losing that revenue making it hard for them to keep better wines in stock. And some items that you can no get in grocery stores are going to stop being carried or carried with a much smaller selection.

But generally, it's a big deal to liquor store owners and not a big deal to anybody else. But the liquor store owners are very motivated and most people don't care that much, and the liquor store owners can form the traditional Bootleggers and Baptist coalition so they have been able to maintain the anti-consumer legislation that exists. The only reason they might lose now is that consumers interests happen to line up with what the big grocers and warehouse chains want.
The liquor stores in Memphis area made a big stink about grocers selling wine before the laws were amended. I wish I could offer some statistics but anecdotally the stores I frequent have expanded after their predictions of demise.
 

HRMSU

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2022
857
662
93
The biggest difference between the Catholics and the Baptists is that the Catholics say hello when they see you in the liquor store.
Congregation vs congregation right.....we might need to leave the priests out of this comparison ****
 
  • Love
Reactions: eckie1

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,460
3,378
113
In principle I agree. It is about the benefit of all. However, the great state of MS has abided by a set of agreements with higly regulated alcohol outlets since inception. One permit allowed per person/family, no items allowed in liquor stores that grocery already carries (can't sell beer, fresh fruit, portable glassware or even margarita salt until recently) Now the inclination all of a sudden to allow ownership of multiple permits, Sunday sales and a "have at it" attitude. They have pulled the rug from a lot of families who have invested in the industry and believed the State.

In full transparency, I am not involved with ownership of any alcohol outlet, I am involved in distribution and would stand to benefit from wider rules for sales. I would certainly order from out of state wine sources. I've seen the insides of the beast and do not trust the animal for a moment. When I suggest that a certain lobbyist group has unfair sway...
So you agree in principle, but...you want to ignore your agreement and support the opposite because you happen to dislike an involved lobby group. That sort of reasoning is the opposite of the word you used- principle.
Brilliant stuff.**

Continuing archaic laws out of tradition is dumb. Its indefensible.
Continuing archaic laws because it will economically harm a few even though it will economically benefit many and socially benefit many is dumb too.

Crap like 'you cant sell a lime in your liquor store!' is dumb.
Not selling on a weekend day is dumb.




All of this just reeks of a mix of pearl clutching and dying on a hill of tradition which very few even care about protecting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Motodawg

Spotdawg

Member
Feb 15, 2007
606
46
28
So you agree in principle, but...you want to ignore your agreement and support the opposite because you happen to dislike an involved lobby group. That sort of reasoning is the opposite of the word you used- principle.
Brilliant stuff.**

Continuing archaic laws out of tradition is dumb. Its indefensible.
Continuing archaic laws because it will economically harm a few even though it will economically benefit many and socially benefit many is dumb too.

Crap like 'you cant sell a lime in your liquor store!' is dumb.
Not selling on a weekend day is dumb.




All of this just reeks of a mix of pearl clutching and dying on a hill of tradition which very few even care about protecting.
You're a little misguided my friend. I am all for open markets, Sunday sales and as I stated I will order wine from California to be delivered to my doorstep. Sell all the wine you want in grocery, my beef is with the state and the lobby. I probably didn't make it evident enough that my point is: the State needs to be out of the liquor business. The ABC is archaic and the laws of Mississippi are structured to keep tight rein on the business errr uh tax monies that are provided. And my beef with lobbyists is because they are bullying their will on the business and its not what's best for the state.

Mississippi needs to be an open state. Take control away from the ABC. Give distributors the ability to bring in, sell and deliver our own product to end users. Its worked for beer distribution and no one has missed a tax payment to the state. The nasty truth is that Mississippi missed millions upon millions of dollars in revenue the past few years due to incompetence and leadership. I have to be careful beyond that...
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login