I honestly believe if we didn’t get that first down and are punting from the end zone, we lose the game. That throw took guts.
That throw didn’t take guts. It’s akin to a punt if intercepted and offers the chance for PI. It’s a common call in that situation. I do agree though that it was a huge play.I honestly believe if we didn’t get that first down and are punting from the end zone, we lose the game. That throw took guts.
YepNo, our ineptitude on 4th & 1 to draw a penalty against ourselves won the game…
That was the play of the game. For once luck was on our side. We almost always lose those.No, our ineptitude on 4th & 1 to draw a penalty against ourselves won the game…
That is a common call in that situation. If it gets picked off it's the same as a punt. It's SAFER than a punt from there. It went our way for once. You need to stop posting.50/50? Again, go back to Genes. That was a duck we got lucky on.
Stop posting, what is wrong with y’all, I hate our fans.
Were you wearing a mask while in your car at home??That is a common call in that situation. If it gets picked off it's the same as a punt. It's SAFER than a punt from there. It went our way for once. You need to stop posting.
So what would you do genius? It freaking worked, and for some reason that seems to have pissed you off.Were you wearing a mask while in your car at home??
Can’t be too safe
We suck so bad we are goodNo, our ineptitude on 4th & 1 to draw a penalty against ourselves won the game…
Username checks out.We suck so bad we are good
Double suckage is a positiveWe suck so bad we are good
If Zavion gets set before the snap, we lose that game. Thanks to our poor execution, we won.I honestly believe if we didn’t get that first down and are punting from the end zone, we lose the game. That throw took guts.
We had set that play up earlier in the game. We're smart like that.No, our ineptitude on 4th & 1 to draw a penalty against ourselves won the game…
If it's incomplete (the most likely outcome in that situation), you're still punting from the back of the endzone. It was a terrible call, it's always a terrible call even if Nick Saban is calling it.That is a common call in that situation. If it gets picked off it's the same as a punt. It's SAFER than a punt from there. It went our way for once. You need to stop posting.
So what's your call?If it's incomplete (the most likely outcome in that situation), you're still punting from the back of the endzone. It was a terrible call, it's always a terrible call even if Nick Saban is calling it.
Sheer luck that we came down with that.
Anything that gave me a few yards to punt the ball away. Throwing the ball up for grabs at my own 30 would definitely have not been my call.So what's your call?
For the record, I don't know or care if it was a bad call. The punt may have been worse, but probably not. But one thing I know for certain, it was NOT a 50/50 ball, which is what this thread was about. We got extremely lucky, which seemed to be the theme of the day for us.So what's your call?
And your confidence that we would have got any yards based on how we were doing at the time?Anything that gave me a few yards to punt the ball away. Throwing the ball up for grabs at my own 30 would definitely have not been my call.
They were in a soft deep zone because it was third and long. That's why there were four guys around Rob on that hail mary of a pass. Any draw play, screen play, or QB keeper would've gotten five to eight yards.And your confidence that we would have got any yards based on how we were doing at the time?
Instead we got 30. You win.They were in a soft deep zone because it was third and long. That's why there were four guys around Rob on that hail mary of a pass. Any draw play, screen play, or QB keeper would've gotten five to eight yards.
Ah, so you're back to ignoring the whole point of the thread.Instead we got 30. You win.
In real life do you discount good fortune like you do here? There was nothing wrong with the call. It's not an uncommon one there. We got lucky, but it wasn't all luck. The receiver made an amazing effort to get that ball. The line did a good job blocking to enable us to get the pass off. If we "get a few yards" we are still punting from the shadow of our own goal post. They would have got great field position and probably scored. That would probably have been the game. We took a risk, it worked, and it probably saved the game. I honestly don't get all the bitching about this one.Ah, so you're back to ignoring the whole point of the thread.
Are you like this in real life too? Or is this a SPS gimmick?
There is nothing 'common' about throwing a ball up for grabs from out of your own end zone on third and long. It is nothing like a punt as you suggest. That is more commonly done around midfield, not out of your own end zone.In real life do you discount good fortune like you do here? There was nothing wrong with the call. It's not an uncommon one there. We got lucky, but it wasn't all luck. The receiver made an amazing effort to get that ball. The line did a good job blocking to enable us to get the pass off. If we "get a few yards" we are still punting from the shadow of our own goal post. They would have got great field position and probably scored. That would probably have been the game. We took a risk, it worked, and it probably saved the game. I honestly don't get all the bitching about this one.
Whay are you so upset about it? It worked. I was very happy about it. Again, had we done what you wanted we would still have been punting from inside the 5 or 10. They would have got the ball on our side of the 50, at a minimum. In all likely hood we would have lost the game. Is that what you wanted?There is nothing 'common' about throwing a ball up for grabs from out of your own end zone on third and long. It is nothing like a punt as you suggest. That is more commonly done around midfield, not out of your own end zone.
We got lucky and I'm glad we did. But that's exactly what it was. A really stupid decision that was bailed out by a tremendous individual effort.
I'm not upset. I'm astounded that you are doubling and tripling down on such an astonishingly stupid position.Whay are you so upset about it? It worked. I was very happy about it. Again, had we done what you wanted we would still have been punting from inside the 5 or 10. They would have got the ball on our side of the 50, at a minimum. In all likely hood we would have lost the game. Is that what you wanted?
Nobody is upset that we caught the ball and went on to win the game. It was a big play, we all agree there.Whay are you so upset about it? It worked. I was very happy about it. Again, had we done what you wanted we would still have been punting from inside the 5 or 10. They would have got the ball on our side of the 50, at a minimum. In all likely hood we would have lost the game. Is that what you wanted?
What's wrong with a 50-50 ball in that situation? I agree that's what it was. It was probably less than that actually. I also get that it's not ideal that the game turned on that play. But it still was perhaps the biggest play in a SEC road game that we were a solid underdog in. To me that is worth being very happy about. You also forget that I always saw this as a 6-6 team. In this particular case I'm on planet earth. It was a big win for this team, and a much needed one.Nobody is upset that we caught the ball and went on to win the game. It was a big play, we all agree there.
That's neither my original point of this thread about it being a 50/50 ball, nor the sub-convo going on here about what play to call in that position.
Serious question - what planet are you on?
OK, so we agree. It was much less than a 50/50 ball. It was at best a 10/90 ball on 3rd and long. As said before, JRob had 3-4 defenders around him, and it was a duck that wasn't thrown well. It might be a 50/50 ball on 2nd and 2 with man to man coverage on the outside, but I'd still set it at 40/60 even in that case.What's wrong with a 50-50 ball in that situation? I agree that's what it was.
Actually, I didn't misinterpret it. I just didn't pay much attention to it.OK, so we agree. It was much less than a 50/50 ball. It was at best a 10/90 ball on 3rd and long. As said before, JRob had 3-4 defenders around him, and it was a duck that wasn't thrown well. It might be a 50/50 ball on 2nd and 2 with man to man coverage on the outside, but I'd still set it at 40/60 even in that case.
That was my original point, and you misinterpreted it. At no point was anybody pissed that he caught the ball. But we do kinda wonder about questionable play-calling.
Yeah, BS on that. That’s why you got all mad.Actually, I didn't misinterpret it. I just didn't pay much attention to it.![]()
MAD? LOL< I thought it was funny.Yeah, BS on that. That’s why you got all mad.
Similar to what I was thinking... everyone keeps saying it was 'lucky'. Maybe whoever called the play was lucky it worked, but the catch wasn't lucky - that was a hell of a play for him to go up and get it. Robinson could really help us if he keeps making that effort.Let me chime in on that 50/50 ball. How many times have you seen Jrob put that much effort in catching a pass ? Maybe I'm crazy but I would say never.
For the record, I agree with you....it was lucky, but that was directed at the decision. I was not questioning Rob's effort or ability on that play. He's the one that made chicken salad out of chicken chit on that play.Similar to what I was thinking... everyone keeps saying it was 'lucky'. Maybe whoever called the play was lucky it worked, but the catch wasn't lucky - that was a hell of a play for him to go up and get it. Robinson could really help us if he keeps making that effort.