Dear Mr. Wetzel....

Seinfeld

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
9,526
3,561
113
the six year losing streak was in the 2000s not the 90s....

Good lord. Hardest coaching job in the SEC West? Ok. Hardest job in the SEC? I’d argue against it. But hardest coaching job in college football? Come on Dan
 

Darryl Steight

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
1,699
2,563
113
I agree with y'all that he is overdoing the poor mouthing, but to me it seems like he was doing that just to set up the story he had already decided to write about Arnett. ZA handles all those types of topics beautifully, comes off as genuinely confident, and backs it up with actual stats - not that anyone in the media pays attention to the stats. They know what they think about State before he answers.

But I actually like it. This article sort of gives us (begrudgingly) some respect for succeeding in the tough neighborhood we live in.

Please, national media, continue to sleep on moo-u, downplay us, tell us how difficult it is to win here at poor ol pitiful State. I much prefer it that way.
 

The Peeper

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2008
12,081
5,292
113
Do Vandy, Northwestern, and Rutgers not play football anymore?

We‘ve been to 13 straight bowl games with 3 different coaches, including one that absolutely sucked and still managed to have an overall record above .500.
Sloe Joe and Leach basically had the same records relating to %, 1 game above .500 Joe was 14-12 Leach 19-17
 

The Peeper

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2008
12,081
5,292
113
I've always questioned the accuracy of this, but don't the talking heads call that "2 games above .500"?
.500 would be 13-13 for Sloe Joe and 18-18 for Leach. They both won one more game than if they had been .500 is how I see it
 

Darryl Steight

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
1,699
2,563
113
.500 would be 13-13 for Sloe Joe and 18-18 for Leach. They both won one more game than if they had been .500 is how I see it
I agree with you, it was really meant to question the way that stat is typically framed - it's always bugged me.
 

MSUDC11-2.0

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
6,740
9,864
113
Sloe Joe and Leach basically had the same records relating to %, 1 game above .500 Joe was 14-12 Leach 19-17

2020 brings Leach’s numbers down. I will always be convinced that if we hadn’t fired Moorhead after the Music City Bowl, we go 1-9 or 0-10 in the COVID season.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
6,245
3,478
113
Joe was handed the keys to a Ferrari, Leach not so much.
More like a mid-level F-150. The legend of how good that team was is more myth than truth. It wouldn't have mattered who the coach was, Fitz was not a consistent passer. I suspect Joe's first year we would have won one more game with Mullen, that game being Florida.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
6,245
3,478
113
2020 brings Leach’s numbers down. I will always be convinced that if we hadn’t fired Moorhead after the Music City Bowl, we go 1-9 or 0-10 in the COVID season.
We were so bad the COVID year because we were trying to install a totally different offense with little to no spring practice.
 

eckie1

Well-known member
Jun 23, 2007
3,241
2,377
113
That's not how games over .500 works. It's wins minus losses. Might make more sense your way, but nobody does it that way.
Yep, they are referencing how many games you’d have to win or lose to get to .500.

But, it’s not incorrect to say 14-12 is one game above the .500 mark of 13-13.
 

kired

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2008
6,477
1,441
113
"He’s a defensive guy now in charge of a program known for its offense."

Wait, what? Does he mean a program known of it's lack offense?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight

Del B Vista

Member
Dec 9, 2010
134
48
28
Yep, they are referencing how many games you’d have to win or lose to get to .500.

But, it’s not incorrect to say 14-12 is one game above the .500 mark of 13-13.
So, if somebody is 14-11, do you say they're 1.5 games above .500? That argument is OK, but in common practice, it's just not done that way.
 

eckie1

Well-known member
Jun 23, 2007
3,241
2,377
113
So, if somebody is 14-11, do you say they're 1.5 games above .500? That argument is OK, but in common practice, it's just not done that way.
Nah, nobody would say that…. They’d say 3 games over .500. I can see it both ways, but it makes more sense to state it as how many games they’d have to win or lose to get to .500.
 

ronpolk

Well-known member
May 6, 2009
8,117
2,609
113
Yep, they are referencing how many games you’d have to win or lose to get to .500.

But, it’s not incorrect to say 14-12 is one game above the .500 mark of 13-13.
It may not be incorrect but it’s also a very odd way to state it, especially when you’re talking about coaches that won’t coach again at the school. Nobody is taking the wins away. So, you’d have to lose 2 games to be .500, which is why people say 2 games above .500
 

Darryl Steight

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
1,699
2,563
113
I wish we were overthrowing the SEC football landscape by force...
Oh man, I totally agree. I hate feeling like our athletic department is stumbling around half-conscious, not knowing who we are or what conference we're in**

Anthony Hopkins Hello GIF by The Academy Awards
 
  • Like
Reactions: WilCoDawg

BrunswickDawg

Member
Aug 22, 2012
269
160
43
It continus to amaze me at how writers can still just blast BS like this and everyone believes it.
Since the 2012 SEC expansion, this is the number of regular season SEC wins for each team (most teams played 90 games):

Bama - 80
UGA - 71
LSU - 58
UF - 54
A&M -48
Aub - 44
MSU - 42
USC - 40
OM - 39
Mizz - 39
UT - 35
UK - 32
Ark - 23
Vandy 21

Just keep selling us short.
 

MSUDC11-2.0

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
6,740
9,864
113
We were so bad the COVID year because we were trying to install a totally different offense with little to no spring practice.

With a normal schedule that’s likely a 5-7 or 6-6 team. We didn’t get to play our three usual cream puffs, and the P5 game would’ve been at NC State, which would’ve been a true toss up.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
48,300
11,937
113
With a normal schedule that’s likely a 5-7 or 6-6 team. We didn’t get to play our three usual cream puffs, and the P5 game would’ve been at NC State, which would’ve been a true toss up.
We were 3-7 in 2020. 2-6 in the regularly scheduled SEC games. Figure we win 3 of the OOC games for sure, and as you say, at NC State is a tossup. So yeah, people claiming we'd be better than 5-7 or 6-6 with a normal schedule are full of manure.
 

WilCoDawg

Well-known member
Sep 6, 2012
4,291
2,236
113
As always, please don’t give him the clicks. Just eye roll at the article’s title and move on.
 

MSUDC11-2.0

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
6,740
9,864
113
We were 3-7 in 2020. 2-6 in the regularly scheduled SEC games. Figure we win 3 of the OOC games for sure, and as you say, at NC State is a tossup. So yeah, people claiming we'd be better than 5-7 or 6-6 with a normal schedule are full of manure.

But even that would have been largely ok enough for a Year 1 in a major transition. I remember our fans sticking their noses up at us accepting a bowl bid at 3-7. Well there’s not much difference in that and 6-6 all things being equal.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login