DOW Futures down another 1600

Status
Not open for further replies.

TrueMaroonGrind

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2017
3,761
1,022
113
It's 100% full of economic and mathematic logic. Economics 101, in fact.

Labeling trade deficits as tariffs and then using tariffs to influence/curb behavior is the consummate example of Trump's strategy in negotiations.

Would you mind articulating why you believe there's no economic or mathematic logic here? What do you predict will happen as a result?
What will happen if these tariffs go into effect for any significant amount of time? The price of everything will go up a lot and many people will lose their jobs. Not to mention we will become a global pariah for sending the world into a global recession.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vandaldawg

birdawg

Member
Aug 13, 2009
965
120
43
What will happen if these tariffs go into effect for any significant amount of time? The price of everything will go up a lot and many people will lose their jobs. Not to mention we will become a global pariah for sending the world into a global recession.
Goods that were once produced overseas and imported will either be produced in the US (creating jobs and increasing wages), or we will import from countries with lower tariffs and more balanced trade agreements, or the exporting country will lower its prices to offset the tariffs to remain competitive. No one is forced to buy foreign goods. That makes zero sense. If you want a German car, you can still get it but it's going to cost you. Or you can buy American.

The long term result is trillions staying in the US and supporting middle class wages for the first time in 50 years.
 

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,896
3,646
113
Goods that were once produced overseas and imported will either be produced in the US (creating jobs and increasing wages), or we will import from countries with lower tariffs and more balanced trade agreements, or the exporting country will lower its prices to offset the tariffs to remain competitive. No one is forced to buy foreign goods. That makes zero sense. If you want a German car, you can still get it but it's going to cost you. Or you can buy American.

The long term result is trillions staying in the US and supporting middle class wages for the first time in 50 years.
1970s logic in a high tech world. Modern industrial investment will be heavily automated and not the people heavy investment it once was. This sounds nice in theory but can't work out that way in reality unless everyone participating has the appetite for massive cost increases. We don't.
 

TrueMaroonGrind

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2017
3,761
1,022
113
Goods that were once produced overseas and imported will either be produced in the US (creating jobs and increasing wages), or we will import from countries with lower tariffs and more balanced trade agreements, or the exporting country will lower its prices to offset the tariffs to remain competitive. No one is forced to buy foreign goods. That makes zero sense. If you want a German car, you can still get it but it's going to cost you. Or you can buy American.

The long term result is trillions staying in the US and supporting middle class wages for the first time in 50 years.
The entire US economy is built off buying foreign goods. Lets just flip a switch and buy American everything…

Let’s get DCD and others to grow some coffee beans and bananas instead of wheat and soybeans. It’s easy y’all. Cmon boys get in line. Let’s just flip an entire economy on its head with no planning whatsoever and spin up some factories from the 1960s. Cmon boys just build more cars at the drop of a hat.

Also let me remind you none of this is codified into law yet. This all just Trump signing an executive order. No company is going to move their production in the current state. This is madness.
 
Last edited:

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
24,347
13,621
113
Goods that were once produced overseas and imported will either be produced in the US (creating jobs and increasing wages), or we will import from countries with lower tariffs and more balanced trade agreements, or the exporting country will lower its prices to offset the tariffs to remain competitive. No one is forced to buy foreign goods. That makes zero sense. If you want a German car, you can still get it but it's going to cost you. Or you can buy American.

The long term result is trillions staying in the US and supporting middle class wages for the first time in 50 years.
That idea is just not the reality. Different countries have the ability to produce different things and they use trade to get what they want and need.

Manufacturing is never going to make a major comeback in this country and if there is a rebound it’s going to be so automated it’s not going to increase jobs. It’s also killing manufacturing that’s already here that relies on exporting their machinery around the world. Cat, Deere, NewHolland/Case and other companies that build construction and farm equipment have started shuttering assembly lines because their foreign orders are being canceled.
 

leeinator

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2014
1,176
848
113
Remember the words of James Carvell, “It’s the economy, stupid.” How many voters have the patience to allow for long-term adjustments in our economy. When prices skyrocket, people lose their jobs and the confidence to buy large-ticket items goes, then unemployment kicks in, the Republican majority will vanish, and then what? I can just see Trump drunk on the south lawn of the White House shouting, “Stella, I could have been a contender…”
Trump doesn't drink, smoke, or do drugs..... (;o)
 

85Bears

Well-known member
Jan 12, 2020
2,562
2,481
108
i was just reading n article by a steel worker, saying how tariffs could help his industry compete and keep their jobs here in the US. Why can’t we ever bring back manufacturing of any kind here ? why Is it not possible ? Automation is a flimsy excuse, other countries still manufacture goods.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
24,347
13,621
113
i was just reading n article by a steel worker, saying how tariffs could help his industry compete and keep their jobs here in the US. Why can’t we ever bring back manufacturing of any kind here ? why Is it not possible ? Automation is a flimsy excuse, other countries still manufacture goods.
Wages. Red tape can be an issue too. Companies can manufacture in other countries at a fraction of the cost due to lower wages and less regulation.

A steel tariff keeps foreign steel from lowering the market price. Great for the steel worker. Not so great for anyone buying anything that requires steel. Makes the cost go up which then causes the consumers to buy less.

Trump did a tariff on steel in his first term. It was not pleasant buying machinery over the next couple of years. Then covid just made it worse.
 
Last edited:

ronpolk

Well-known member
May 6, 2009
8,500
3,329
113
Goods that were once produced overseas and imported will either be produced in the US (creating jobs and increasing wages), or we will import from countries with lower tariffs and more balanced trade agreements, or the exporting country will lower its prices to offset the tariffs to remain competitive. No one is forced to buy foreign goods. That makes zero sense. If you want a German car, you can still get it but it's going to cost you. Or you can buy American.

The long term result is trillions staying in the US and supporting middle class wages for the first time in 50 years.
There is zero chance this happens the way you think it will.
 

Drebin

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
17,874
16,112
113
I really don’t give a damn about the markets. Tariffs and the retaliation of tariffs from other countries are going to make everyone’s life a lot harder. People complained about inflation and the cost of living….you ain’t seen nothing yet if he allows this to continue.
I liked the idea of reciprocal tariffs on the biggest offenders. I liked the idea of using them to force canada and mexico to help secure the border. They've largely been used as a hammer for negotiating. I don't like the broad nature of what's being done now. But I'm gonna give it a little time and see how it shakes out before I overreact on it. There's already been more than 50 countries lining up to renegotiate trade. There are people in this thread saying "tariffs never work" and they clearly have no idea what they're talking about.
 

ronpolk

Well-known member
May 6, 2009
8,500
3,329
113
i was just reading n article by a steel worker, saying how tariffs could help his industry compete and keep their jobs here in the US. Why can’t we ever bring back manufacturing of any kind here ? why Is it not possible ? Automation is a flimsy excuse, other countries still manufacture goods.
Because thankfully we have a higher standard of living than Vietnam and China. For a long time now, anyone who wants a job can get a job. Why do we need low margin ****** manufacturing here? Leave that to countries who are developing or don’t care if they have a low standard of living.

Specifically, what are you hoping comes back?
 

Dawgzilla2

Well-known member
Oct 9, 2022
1,171
1,351
113
It's 100% full of economic and mathematic logic. Economics 101, in fact.

Labeling trade deficits as tariffs and then using tariffs to influence/curb behavior is the consummate example of Trump's strategy in negotiations.

Would you mind articulating why you believe there's no economic or mathematic logic here? What do you predict will happen as a result?
You obviously took a different ECON course than I did, but mine was 40 years ago. And for some reason MSU was using 4 digit numbers, so I think it was ECON 1101.

I understand Trump is equating trade deficits with tariffs. I am not aware of any economics theory that equates the two, and most experts tend to believe tariffs make deficits worse.

My prediction for what will happen is that world leaders will approach Trump with some minor symbol of fealty and he will withdraw the tariffs...and probably wet his beak a little as part of the shakedown. "Yes, Prime Minister Ishiba, in exchange for your promise to raise the amount of rice you buy from the US, we will lift our tariffs on Japanese goods.....and. say, wouldn't a nice new Trump Tower look great in Tokyo?"
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
24,347
13,621
113
I liked the idea of reciprocal tariffs on the biggest offenders. I liked the idea of using them to force canada and mexico to help secure the border. They've largely been used as a hammer for negotiating. I don't like the broad nature of what's being done now. But I'm gonna give it a little time and see how it shakes out before I overreact on it. There's already been more than 50 countries lining up to renegotiate trade. There are people in this thread saying "tariffs never work" and they clearly have no idea what they're talking about.
My livelihood very much relies on exporting to other countries so tariffs just complicate things in a farm economy that is approaching 1980s bad before all this happened.
 

85Bears

Well-known member
Jan 12, 2020
2,562
2,481
108
Because thankfully we have a higher standard of living than Vietnam and China. For a long time now, anyone who wants a job can get a job. Why do we need low margin ****** manufacturing here? Leave that to countries who are developing or don’t care if they have a low standard of living.

Specifically, what are you hoping comes back?
oh, we are too good to manufacture anything ? That’s for third world countries ?

service industry jobs and trading paper is not economic health. There are many reasons you want domestic manufacturing, it creates solid middle class jobs, it provides a tax base, it makes a country independent in times of crisis or war.

selling each other hamburgers is not a strong country or economy.
 

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,896
6,139
113
Getting tired of living through these record days.
If the benchmark index were to lose more than 4% in value today, it would be the first time since 1929 that there were 3 consecutive trading days with declines of more than 4%. Historic times indeed, particularly when all the headwinds were birthed in less than 3 months. Good news, he's working hard now to find a path to a historic 3rd term. We may be greater than we ever imagined if he can keep on pushing that pesky Constitution aside...
 

ronpolk

Well-known member
May 6, 2009
8,500
3,329
113
oh, we are too good to manufacture anything ? That’s for third world countries ?

service industry jobs and trading paper is not economic health. There are many reasons you want domestic manufacturing, it creates solid middle class jobs, it provides a tax base, it makes a country independent in times of crisis or war.

selling each other hamburgers is not a strong country or economy.
Answer the question I asked… what specific type of manufacture do you want us competing with China for? You wanna make $3 happy meal toys here?

And to answer your question, yes our standard of living here in the US has priced us out of certain type of manufacturing. Sorry, I don’t see that as a bad thing.
 

vandaldawg

Active member
Feb 23, 2008
2,115
266
83
I wonder how many realize they voted for this, something that didn't remotely happen in Term 1
There were people in place at that time that curbed the stupider instincts. Those people aren't there this time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MSUDOG24

Maroon Eagle

Well-known member
May 24, 2006
17,046
6,354
102
We buy more from South Korea than they buy from us. Who cares.

They’re not going to buy as much because they only have 50 million people to consume goods.

Curb Your Enthusiasm Bingo GIF by Jason Clarke
 

85Bears

Well-known member
Jan 12, 2020
2,562
2,481
108
Answer the question I asked… what specific type of manufacture do you want us competing with China for? You wanna make $3 happy meal toys here?

And to answer your question, yes our standard of living here in the US has priced us out of certain type of manufacturing. Sorry, I don’t see that as a bad thing.
I didn’t answer the question because it is so obvious. Any and all manufacturing we can get should be done at home. All of the 20-30 somethings living with their parents who can’t afford a home, might be able to form a family. This is how it was done in the 80s. There were actually good middle class jobs for graduating high school students who did not go to college.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
9,728
9,063
113
oh, we are too good to manufacture anything ? That’s for third world countries ?

service industry jobs and trading paper is not economic health. There are many reasons you want domestic manufacturing, it creates solid middle class jobs, it provides a tax base, it makes a country independent in times of crisis or war.

selling each other hamburgers is not a strong country or economy.
You really don't want low-skilled manufacturing here again. It's just not the best use of our human capital.
 

Dawgzilla2

Well-known member
Oct 9, 2022
1,171
1,351
113
I forgot to add in my last post that one great result from these tariffs would be Congress banding together to take back some of the responsibilities it has delegated to POTUS.

I know it seems unlikely, but while we're daydreaming about ways this nonsense will Make America Greater, let me have this one.
 

birdawg

Member
Aug 13, 2009
965
120
43
1970s logic in a high tech world. Modern industrial investment will be heavily automated and not the people heavy investment it once was. This sounds nice in theory but can't work out that way in reality unless everyone participating has the appetite for massive cost increases. We don't.
1970s logic lol. What would happen if we continued the former status quo trajectory for another 20 years?

Our society has become so lazy it cannot fathom short term pain for long term gain. Fat? Just take Ozempic instead of exercising and eating right.

I'm sorry the economy is no longer emotion-based. Back to Econ 101.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,896
3,646
113
I liked the idea of reciprocal tariffs on the biggest offenders. I liked the idea of using them to force canada and mexico to help secure the border. They've largely been used as a hammer for negotiating. I don't like the broad nature of what's being done now. But I'm gonna give it a little time and see how it shakes out before I overreact on it. There's already been more than 50 countries lining up to renegotiate trade. There are people in this thread saying "tariffs never work" and they clearly have no idea what they're talking about.
Said it a million times. Intelligent tariffs in the right situation can be very effective. Sledge hammer approach is just a giant mess. I'll be blown away if we really do commit to this approach. But like you I still think we are going to pull a few good deals out of this and pull way back and claim victory. Markets will settle to a large extent and hopefully we can increase our customer base as a result.

My concern with the approach is that governments get tired of us being a loose cannon and realign as best they can to shut us out. The chaos and uncertainty is wearing them out. Could they shut us out? No likely not but it could end up net negative all things considered once it all shakes out and we'll be wondering why we did this in the first place. Will sting even more with it being 1 man making it happen rather than a congress. Or it works and we have Trump statues on the White House lawn honoring his genius.
 

dorndawg

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2012
7,860
6,974
113
I liked the idea of reciprocal tariffs on the biggest offenders. I liked the idea of using them to force canada and mexico to help secure the border. They've largely been used as a hammer for negotiating. I don't like the broad nature of what's being done now. But I'm gonna give it a little time and see how it shakes out before I overreact on it. There's already been more than 50 countries lining up to renegotiate trade. There are people in this thread saying "tariffs never work" and they clearly have no idea what they're talking about.
1744034391119.jpeg
 

vandaldawg

Active member
Feb 23, 2008
2,115
266
83
Again, tariffs have never and will never work. This isn't about what we want to happen. They just don't 17ing work.

Trump is either a lying mother17er or a stupid mother17er. There's no other option. If this was all to get rid of foreign tariffs on US exports, he could have just threatened removing US economic aid, and we wouldn't be the ones getting 17ed. We would have benefited either way. Instead, we're the ones getting 17ed, and way too many of you are happily going along with it.

Anyone who considers themselves small government and/ or fiscally conservative who thinks this is a good idea should be ashamed. This is absolute lunacy.
This all day and twice on Black Monday.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: MagnoliaHunter

Drebin

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
17,874
16,112
113
My livelihood very much relies on exporting to other countries so tariffs just complicate things in a farm economy that is approaching 1980s bad before all this happened.
I get that. I'm not criticizing how you feel about it. Like I said, I think we're overreaching with tariffs right now too. But I'm inclined to let it play out. A lot of the noise out there is coming from people who a)don't understand what's trying to be accomplished, b)is freaked by the stock market, or c)just hates all things trump.

He enacted some pretty extreme tariffs on China in his first term and there was a lot of weeping and gnashing of teeth over it, and it turned out to be fine after initial stock market shock and 24/7 media coverage of "trump bad."
 

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,896
3,646
113
1970s logic lol. What would happen if we continued the former status quo trajectory for another 20 years?

Our society has become so lazy it cannot fathom short term pain for long term gain. Fat? Just take Ozempic instead of exercising and eating right.

I'm sorry the economy is no longer emotion-based. Back to Econ 101.
What's the long term gain? Nobody is articulating what it is other than a return to an economic style that relies on headcount in manufacturing that simply won't happen with today's technology. It's dated now like saying let's return to farming to drive job growth. That's just not going to drive the numbers that people want in jobs that pay well. I wish it could happen but it can't in a high tech capitalist world. We have to think differently now if we want to compete long term.
 

Maroon Eagle

Well-known member
May 24, 2006
17,046
6,354
102
I didn’t answer the question because it is so obvious. Any and all manufacturing we can get should be done at home. All of the 20-30 somethings living with their parents who can’t afford a home, might be able to form a family. This is how it was done in the 80s. There were actually good middle class jobs for graduating high school students who did not go to college.
Things change.

Those high school students should attend Jucos so they can be trained to work at auto & tire plants.

And that doesn’t even go into the question how long does it take to construct a plant so that industries can produce something.

Don’t forget to take into account the 25 percent steel and aluminum tariffs in the construction costs…
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
13,102
3,477
113
oh, we are too good to manufacture anything ? That’s for third world countries ?

service industry jobs and trading paper is not economic health. There are many reasons you want domestic manufacturing, it creates solid middle class jobs, it provides a tax base, it makes a country independent in times of crisis or war.

selling each other hamburgers is not a strong country or economy.
People think manufacturing just magically creates middle class jobs and that's just not the case. There was a brief period of time where manufacturing paid pretty well for unskilled jobs. You can get middle class wages for semi-skilled jobs for some high value goods that are expensive to ship. But for most of these manufacturing jobs, the only way to make them have middle class wages is to use government intervention to prevent the market from working and drive up costs so that much fewer of the goods in question are made and used, and people in general are poorer in exchange for making some very small subset of workers better off.

That's not to say we can't put the thumbs on the scale and move where manufacturing is done on the margins. A 10% tariff would just be another tax. There'd be some deadweight loss, but you throw in the extra government revenue and some reshoring of jobs because of the combined with savings on shipping and eliminating some logistics related risk plus avoiding the tariff, and it's possibly better than most other forms of taxes. But even at the high rates that have been announced, we're not going to start manufacturing a lot of goods here. For many relatively basic goods, it's just too expensive to do business here with all of the regulatory headache before you even get to the question of wages and whether workers are as productive.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
13,102
3,477
113
Answer the question I asked… what specific type of manufacture do you want us competing with China for? You wanna make $3 happy meal toys here?

And to answer your question, yes our standard of living here in the US has priced us out of certain type of manufacturing. Sorry, I don’t see that as a bad thing.
Not who you directed it to and not just limited to manufacturing, but steel, rare earth metals, pharmaceuticals, shipbuilding, air craft manufacturing, and chips.

Don't have to necessarily have all of that done in the US as long as it's out of China and each industry is spread out over multiple countries reasonably expected to remain friendly to the US. But that's sort of challenging because economies of scale drives some industries to be really concentrated (such as generic drug manufacturing I believe).
 

ronpolk

Well-known member
May 6, 2009
8,500
3,329
113
I didn’t answer the question because it is so obvious. Any and all manufacturing we can get should be done at home. All of the 20-30 somethings living with their parents who can’t afford a home, might be able to form a family. This is how it was done in the 80s. There were actually good middle class jobs for graduating high school students who did not go to college.
The 80’s aren’t coming back. The cost of living is higher. You want to bring a bunch of low tech manufacturing back and give people jobs where they can’t afford housing. Again, im all for creating manufacturing where people can earn wages to support cost of living. Your plan will pay people minimum wage to work in **** conditions and they wont be able to afford a house.
 

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
9,538
10,272
113
I forgot to add in my last post that one great result from these tariffs would be Congress banding together to take back some of the responsibilities it has delegated to POTUS.

I know it seems unlikely, but while we're daydreaming about ways this nonsense will Make America Greater, let me have this one.
100%, the president shouldn’t be able to just executive order whatever whim he wants. I don’t remember that happening prior to Obama, but could just be my lack of memory.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
9,728
9,063
113
The 80’s aren’t coming back. The cost of living is higher. You want to bring a bunch of low tech manufacturing back and give people jobs where they can’t afford housing. Again, im all for creating manufacturing where people can earn wages to support cost of living. Your plan will pay people minimum wage to work in **** conditions and they wont be able to afford a house.
My theory is that it's what you posted, that is essentially what this deal is all about. Rage about a time that is long gone, and a changing world.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ronpolk
Status
Not open for further replies.