Expansion is like having ice cream for breakfast, lunch and supper every day

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,158
12,146
113
In dealing with my kids, they always want a treat after supper. Every night. Obviously, 90% of the time the answer is "no". Sometimes we say "yes". They often ask "why not?" So we have to explain that it's not a treat if you get it every day. It's like a kid who loves ice cream. They don't realize it, but they love ice cream BECAUSE it's something you don't get all the time. If you gave then ice cream for breakfast. lunch and supper every single day, it wouldn't be a couple days before it lost its novelty and a few days until they were sick of it.

In all this expansion chaos you hear people glowing about all the wonderful matchups it'll create. Well, many of those matchups that will be created would have been fun pre-expansion for the very reason that they were rare. A SoCal/OSU matchup would have been fun to see for the very reason that it was a novelty. Now when it's happening every couple of years or so, it's just gonna be old hat. Same for Texas/Bama. With the Texas/Bama game last year, you had folks saying "Imagine once Texas is in the SEC!" Well, them joining the SEC takes away the very thing that made the game a fun matchup.

In creating the matchups that people want to see, expansion takes away the thing that made those matchups intriguing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boduke

Prestonyte

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
5,261
5,214
113
In dealing with my kids, they always want a treat after supper. Every night. Obviously, 90% of the time the answer is "no". Sometimes we say "yes". They often ask "why not?" So we have to explain that it's not a treat if you get it every day. It's like a kid who loves ice cream. They don't realize it, but they love ice cream BECAUSE it's something you don't get all the time. If you gave then ice cream for breakfast. lunch and supper every single day, it wouldn't be a couple days before it lost its novelty and a few days until they were sick of it.

In all this expansion chaos you hear people glowing about all the wonderful matchups it'll create. Well, many of those matchups that will be created would have been fun pre-expansion for the very reason that they were rare. A SoCal/OSU matchup would have been fun to see for the very reason that it was a novelty. Now when it's happening every couple of years or so, it's just gonna be old hat. Same for Texas/Bama. With the Texas/Bama game last year, you had folks saying "Imagine once Texas is in the SEC!" Well, them joining the SEC takes away the very thing that made the game a fun matchup.

In creating the matchups that people want to see, expansion takes away the thing that made those matchups intriguing.
Like the parenting analogy - obviously you've lived through it :)

Sadly, the true rivalry matchups may suffer severe limitations/extinctions.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,158
12,146
113
Sadly, the true rivalry matchups may suffer severe limitations/extinctions.

Yep, and that's another aspect of this.

It will adversely impact the traditional rivalries while giving us more of the intriguing matchups that were only intriguing because they were infrequent.

Absolutely nothing good comes from expansion. Not one good thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Prestonyte

Uscg1984

Well-known member
Jan 28, 2022
1,778
2,355
113
There will never be a college football playoff game that matches the anticipation and the intensity of the Catholics vs Convicts ND/Miami game. Or the average FSU/Miami game from the late 80s through the 90s, for that matter.