Hack's skill set didn't translate to the offense that Franklin tried to run in 15. Hack worked real well for what O'Brien wanted to do. McSorley came in and was able to excel because he was able to escape the constant trouble the bad o-line put him in. Plus, Trace was the type of QB that Franklin wanted for his offense at the time -- someone mobile that wasn't afraid to take hits vs a QB in Hack who was the classic dropback passer. Regardless of what you think of the organization who drafted him, a player who gets taken in the 2nd round of the NFL draft is not a bust at the college level. Did Hack disappoint in 2015? No doubt.
Thank you for sharing your opinion in a cordial and professional manner. I really appreciate the dialogue and always welcome opposing views unlike some posters.
I agree with your assessment of McSorley and him being a better fit for coach Franklin’s style of offense.
However, your logic linking draft position to whether or not a player was a bust at the collegiate level, is very faulty and illogical. You are basically saying no matter how poorly a player performs at the collegiate level, he can’t ever be called a bust at the collegiate level if he was drafted by the NFL. This makes no sense to me.
The college bust label applies only to expectations vs. actual performance at the collegiate level. It has nothing to do with the future draft status of a player. Some NFL teams make mistakes in drafting players and sometimes a player may mature and develop later under a different system. As an example, the fact that Hack was a bust in the NFL (there are numerous NFL articles written on this), has nothing to do with his collegiate performance at Penn State.