Your title contains sundress and that’s the gif you use? Democrats are weird.
Wait, there are people who don't celebrate sndresses day?
Thoughts to ponder, is the hitter in the MLB logo a righty or lefty?
What did I do?
You made Eve put clothes on.What did I do?
I feel like the general mood of our fanbase is that it’s Lemonis without pics.Wait, there are people who don't celebrate sndresses day?
And also, obligatory this thread is croom without pics gif. Or maybe in honor of yesterday's discussion it should be this thread is stansbury without pics
I had never seen anything but a right handed batter until this. If I focus higher in the pic I see right handed and lower in the pick I see left handed.Thoughts to ponder, is the hitter in the MLB logo a righty or lefty?
![]()
There’s an Optical Illusion Hidden in the MLB Logo
The silhouetted player in the MLB logo is ambiguous in more ways than one.www.mentalfloss.com
Also, sundresses. Hmm...
No. Might go back and read again. I gave her a choice, and I did 17 her. But come on I am the Devil.You made Eve put clothes on.
I'm sorry. I can't see anything other than a right handed batter.I had never seen anything but a right handed batter until this. If I focus higher in the pic I see right handed and lower in the pick I see left handed.
Both might want to read again. You aren't even in the story.No. Might go back and read again. I gave her a choice, and I did 17 her. But come on I am the Devil.
Huh? I am actually a central figure in the story.Both might want to read again. You aren't even in the story.
Put me down as always seeing left handed until this.I had never seen anything but a right handed batter until this. If I focus higher in the pic I see right handed and lower in the pick I see left handed.
I guess I would've been happy to google yall some pic of sundresses, but I really cannot recommend enough simply going outside anywhere there might be women. Ideally, try not to be weird and run them off for the rest of us.
Good luck on your journey, Bulldawgs.
Thank you for your service 🫡I walked across campus today for lunch and the long tan legs in short shorts were everywhere. Gotta love this time of year.....
There is a serpent that is not called Satan in the Bible. But then again, neither is Lucifer ever named Satan either. Both of those ideas are from outside the Bible. A couple of interesting books on the topic of Satan are Satan and the Problem of Evil by Wright and The Satan: How Gods Executioner Became the Enemy by Collins.Huh? I am actually a central figure in the story.
While the serpent is not explicitly identified as Satan in Genesis, later interpretations, particularly in the New Testament and later traditions, connect the serpent with the devil. Also, thank you for the book recommendations.There is a serpent that is not called Satan in the Bible. But then again, neither is Lucifer ever named Satan either. Both of those ideas are from outside the Bible. A couple of interesting books on the topic of Satan are Satan and the Problem of Evil by Wright and The Satan: How Gods Executioner Became the Enemy by Collins.
Sure thing. The later interpretations is what I meant by being "outside the Bible." I think the New Testament references are erroneous. (eg Rev 12 and 20 as well as Romans 16:20.) I'm definitely not an expert. Just an old history major (not this area of history though) with a bit of an interest in Bible history as well.While the serpent is not explicitly identified as Satan in Genesis, later interpretations, particularly in the New Testament and later traditions, connect the serpent with the devil. Also, thank you for the book recommendations.
Also, allow me to graciously say thank you for the open-minded debate. Usually controversial stuff comes down to name-calling here, so it is fun to get to learn from each other for once.Sure thing. The later interpretations is what I meant by being "outside the Bible." I think the New Testament references are erroneous. (eg Rev 12 and 20 as well as Romans 16:20.) I'm definitely not an expert. Just an old history major (not this area of history though) with a bit of an interest in Bible history as well.
Only on SPS would a high-potential sundresses thread morph into civil discussions of exegetical epistemologyAlso, allow me to graciously say thank you for the open-minded debate. Usually controversial stuff comes down to name-calling here, so it is fun to get to learn from each other for once.
We have potential.Only on SPS would a high-potential sundresses thread morph into civil discussions of exegetical epistemology
That's easy for you to say.Only on SPS would a high-potential sundresses thread morph into civil discussions of exegetical epistemology
I agree. And thank you too.Also, allow me to graciously say thank you for the open-minded debate. Usually controversial stuff comes down to name-calling here, so it is fun to get to learn from each other for once.
Only on SPS would a high-potential sundresses thread morph into civil discussions of exegetical epistemology