Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

Hanmudog

New member
Apr 30, 2006
5,853
0
0
Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

Saw where they got rid of the oversigning rule AND the Masoli transfer rule. Does this mean that there is no chance that Brunetti plays this year?
 
G

Goat 4 Eva

Guest
Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

Those two schools get **** on so damn much by the SEC. Now, I know if we'd buck the trend and win some games and actually contribute something to the conference, we'd get some love from the SEC too. But **** it's tough to do when your left hand is tied behind your back all the time. <div>
</div><div>I really don't know what other team could team with us though. Vanderbilt is really an afterthought, they contribute academics. Kentucky is catered to for basketball, see the abolishing of the division format. South Carolina is kinda an afterthought too, but now they've won a National Title. Arkansas maybe? That's all for the bottom six. The other six get catered to routinely.</div><div>
</div><div>It just seems to me that the MS schools are the only ones being 'held back'. Maybe we do it to ourselves though. I don't know.</div>
 

AssEndDawg

Member
Aug 1, 2007
3,180
36
48
Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

Goat 4 Eva said:
Those two schools get **** on so damn much by the SEC. Now, I know if we'd buck the trend and win some games and actually contribute something to the conference, we'd get some love from the SEC too. But **** it's tough to do when your left hand is tied behind your back all the time. <div>
</div><div>I really don't know what other team could team with us though. Vanderbilt is really an afterthought, they contribute academics. Kentucky is catered to for basketball, see the abolishing of the division format. South Carolina is kinda an afterthought too, but now they've won a National Title. Arkansas maybe? That's all for the bottom six. The other six get catered to routinely.</div><div>
</div><div>It just seems to me that the MS schools are the only ones being 'held back'. Maybe we do it to ourselves though. I don't know.</div>
that this is the stupidest, whiny ******** I've ever heard. That is all....
 

Rebels7

New member
Mar 3, 2008
1,389
0
0
Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

They're talking about the Masoli situation and the guy y'all got from Clemson. Not general transfers, that would asinine.
 

Hanmudog

New member
Apr 30, 2006
5,853
0
0
Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

Rebels7 said:
They're talking about the Masoli situation and the guy y'all got from Clemson. Not general transfers, that would asinine.
Notas "asinine" as putting words in that I didn't say. Where did I say anything about "general transfers"?

Do you deny that Masoli's high profile transfer under the cover of a "parks and recreation major" are what spurred this rule change?
 

Requiem For A Dawg

Active member
Dec 3, 2008
4,022
364
83
Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

So I am confused too. He is a general transfer who was granted a waiver to play (which I am sure you know.) I am pretty sure this rule has nothing to do with him.
 

gravedigger

New member
Feb 6, 2009
1,654
0
0
Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

he left his former team. It was a mistake to allow him to use the rule in the first place.

Our guy is using the rule just as written.
 
G

Goat 4 Eva

Guest
Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

Masoli was just a bigger name and had committed some crimes. Either way, it was all legal. Nutt's reputation took a hit because of Masoli's background, not the actual transfer.<div>
</div><div>Open your eyes.</div>
 

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,890
3,638
113
Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

Masoli wouldn't have been at Ole Miss had he not gotten in trouble and kicked out of school. Maye would not be at MSU without a change in defenses at Clemson...we have to be honest about that.

Still, it's about picking and choosing when to take advantage of the rules. I guarantee that the SEC would not had adopted that rule had the Masoli thing not happened, regardless of whatever reason Brandon Maye has in transferring to MSU. There's a common sense difference between taking advantage of a rule and making an outright mockery of it. The Masoli scenario was exactly that and now we have a rule to prevent all future scenarios no matter how innocent or malicious.
 

FreeDawg

Active member
Oct 6, 2010
3,656
278
68
Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

Maye and Masoliare not the same situation at all. The same rule, but not the same situation. Masoli caught a felony with a misdameaner on the side. Maye is using the rule the way it was written, he was not kicked off his team. Burnetti isnt tranfering under this rule, he's using a hardship waiver. That should clear it up, now yall can respond without sucking.
 

StarkContrast

Member
Oct 20, 2010
174
19
18
Has the SEC spent the entire time at their meeting fixing rules that Nutt abused?

Masoli cheated the system and got in a joke of an academic program that he never even finished, Maye graduated from one program at one school and go in a related post-grad program at another, he was also not kicked out of his last school...........</p>