Hearing OJ simpson is dead.
- Thread starter Walkthedawg
- Start date
It is.
New York Post
Your source for breaking news, news about New York, sports, business, entertainment, opinion, real estate, culture, fashion, and more.
nypost.com
He escaped justice in this life. But everyone's time comes sooner or later.
When they provide his full name, can't help but recall the jury foreman stumbling over his name in such a rush to declare him not guilty.
OJ Simpson killed two people and was acquitted in the name of social justice.
Justice would have been the parties involved being viewed as individuals: Two innocent people murdered, one guilty person convicted.
Social justice views people not as individuals but as members of a group: Two white people murdered, one black person acquitted as payback for past injustices perpetrated by white people against black people.
To be clear, there were injustices committed by the LAPD against members of the black community in the early nineties. However, Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman had nothing to do with these injustices. And these injustices had nothing to do with the crimes committed by OJ Simpson.
Any time you hear the relatively new term social justice, you should think of OJ Simpson. By definition, it is something different than justice. Otherwise, why make the distinction? It is similar to when we say something is politically correct. We aren't saying it's correct. In the same way, when we say something is right according to the concept of social justice, we aren't saying that it is right according to our existing concept of justice.
Justice would have been the parties involved being viewed as individuals: Two innocent people murdered, one guilty person convicted.
Social justice views people not as individuals but as members of a group: Two white people murdered, one black person acquitted as payback for past injustices perpetrated by white people against black people.
To be clear, there were injustices committed by the LAPD against members of the black community in the early nineties. However, Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman had nothing to do with these injustices. And these injustices had nothing to do with the crimes committed by OJ Simpson.
Any time you hear the relatively new term social justice, you should think of OJ Simpson. By definition, it is something different than justice. Otherwise, why make the distinction? It is similar to when we say something is politically correct. We aren't saying it's correct. In the same way, when we say something is right according to the concept of social justice, we aren't saying that it is right according to our existing concept of justice.
behavioral evidence is not admissible in court, but I will tell you this.
when there is a violent love crime, there are often multiple stabs/shots on the victim(s) (there was)
when someone kills their spouse/significant other they almost always
1) change their appearance (he did)
2) become suicidal (he did)
3) leave the area (he did)
they also have prior rage/anger/violent outburts or domestic abuse patterns (he did)
when there is a violent love crime, there are often multiple stabs/shots on the victim(s) (there was)
when someone kills their spouse/significant other they almost always
1) change their appearance (he did)
2) become suicidal (he did)
3) leave the area (he did)
they also have prior rage/anger/violent outburts or domestic abuse patterns (he did)
Last edited:
Take this with a grain of salt but it is interesting. Back in the mid 2000's when I was living in San Diego, a co-worker told me that his wife worked at the courthouse during the trial. He said that she told him the rumor floating around the courthouse during the trial was that OJ didn't do it but he was there when it happened and he knew who did it. The word was that Nichole had a pretty hefty cocaine addiction and ran up a huge debt to the dealer. OJ had paid it off once for her but wouldn't pay a 2nd time. He got word they were going to knock her off and tried to get there to warn her. And since he knew that if he talked, he would be next so he had to keep quiet and leave his fate up to a jury.
I still think he did it. Even if that 'rumor' were true, he would still have been a loose end and would have been sleeping with the fishes shortly after.
I still think he did it. Even if that 'rumor' were true, he would still have been a loose end and would have been sleeping with the fishes shortly after.
I don’t think it was social justice. It was money. Robert Durst and Robert Blake weren’t found innocent because of social justice.
That's a nice bit of fiction. But there's zero chance that's what happened.
The thing that I'm sad about is Norm Macdonald isn't here.
a drug dealer aint gonna stab a dude 22 times and try to cut a lady's head almost off
I'm sure OJ has CTE, and that doesn't excuse what he (allegedly) did. However, I'd love to see if there could be any research done on his brain.
Yeah.. if you owe me money, there's one sure fire way I'm never getting paid.
Damn I had heard Ole Miss was bringing him in as a football analyst. Tough
Exactly. This was a crime of passion. Despite of what an earlier poster said, behavioral evidence is admissible in court. And all the behavioral evidence points very strongly to Simpson. This was as much of a slam dunk case as a murder trial gets.
If salvation doesn't fit, then Hell certainly won't acquit
Yep. Good lawyers and a high profile are a big assist in working the system to your advantage.
If you never watched, The People vs OJ Simpson is some really good tv. It originally aired on FX so I assume it's on Hulu.
en.wikipedia.org
The People v. O. J. Simpson: American Crime Story - Wikipedia
Yo Morningstar,
Why don't you post the Juice's torture schedule for the next week or so.
You gonna bring him along slowly or start with the lava right outta the gate?
Why don't you post the Juice's torture schedule for the next week or so.
You gonna bring him along slowly or start with the lava right outta the gate?
Literally laughed out loud.
You can see the smoke from whatever launched that dummy.
I agree it shouldn't be, but behavioral evidence is increasingly being admitted via 911 recordings:
They Called 911 for Help. Police and Prosecutors Used a New Junk Science to Decide They Were Liars.
Tracing the fallacy of 911 call analysis through the justice system, from Quantico to the courtroom.
www.propublica.org
This is a reach. He was convicted for reasons:
1. He paid a lot of money for a great defense team who overwhelmed the prosecution.
2. DNA evidence was very new in 1994. Although that DNA conclusively indicates OJ did it, people just didn't grasp how undeniable the evidence was back then.
If this case had happened today, even the wokest jury imaginable would have convicted him, even despite of #1, because the evidence is just that damning.
Latest posts
Get unlimited access today.