You forgot that we are all about helping "the least of these" unless it takes a dime out of our pocket directly, or indirectly via government programs.Harm reduction is an extremely important link in the path to reducing the 100,000+ overdose deaths we have in our country. I'm not sure why anyone would oppose this unless they somehow believe addiction should be a death sentence.
When did all you Darwinists stop believing in natural selection??Harm reduction is an extremely important link in the path to reducing the 100,000+ overdose deaths we have in our country. I'm not sure why anyone would oppose this unless they somehow believe addiction should be a death sentence.
It is the quintessential American dilemma.When did all you Darwinists stop believing in natural selection??
You're making the assertation that the best way to help thousands of drug addicts on the streets (mostly because of choices they have made in life, unfortunately) is to give them free and easier access to paraphernalia... and also wanting me to fund it with my tax dollars. Well sir, you can call me a meany all you want, but I respectfully disagree with every fiber of my being.You forgot that we are all about helping "the least of these" unless it takes a dime out of our pocket directly, or indirectly via government programs.
You're making the assertation that the best way to help thousands of drug addicts on the streets (mostly because of choices they have made in life, unfortunately) is to give them free and easier access to paraphernalia... and also wanting me to fund it with my tax dollars. Well sir, you can call me a meany all you want, but I respectfully disagree with every fiber of my being.
I'll keep giving to charity in my own ways, which are not that.
I'm not sure why anyone would oppose this unless they somehow believe addiction should be a death sentence.
Nothing wrong with that at all… but I think you can also admit that the status quo is not quite working either. More and more drugged out homeless people spreading diseases and overdosing. I’m not saying this is the correct way or that it will lead to anything positive, but it’s at least an attempt to do something rather than sit back and continue to do nothing.You're making the assertation that the best way to help thousands of drug addicts on the streets (mostly because of choices they have made in life, unfortunately) is to give them free and easier access to paraphernalia... and also wanting me to fund it with my tax dollars. Well sir, you can call me a meany all you want, but I respectfully disagree with every fiber of my being.
I'll keep giving to charity in my own ways, which are not that.
I don't think placing stuff out there like this is the most helpful to an addict. To me, it's like the government is encouraging a continuation of a REALLY bad habit that often leads to death. On the other hand, placing addicts in prison typically doesn't help either and can in fact make it worse. We really need good mental health/recovery facilities that would help folks get off these drugs. I'd rather see my tax dollars go to that than a lot of things our government wastes it on. Also, major drug dealers and cartels should be thrown in the deepest hole found and never see the daylight again. Those guys profit off of human suffering.
Where did I assert it was "best"? Are you making an assertion that you know how to "best" handle the situation.You're making the assertation that the best way to help thousands of drug addicts on the streets (mostly because of choices they have made in life, unfortunately) is to give them free and easier access to paraphernalia... and also wanting me to fund it with my tax dollars. Well sir, you can call me a meany all you want, but I respectfully disagree with every fiber of my being.
I'll keep giving to charity in my own ways, which are not that.
This is sadder than the link in the OP.You forgot that we are all about helping "the least of these" unless it takes a dime out of our pocket directly, or indirectly via government programs.
I think that it is a complex problem for which I have no answers. Unfortunately, we won't find answers because we are so highly politicized that there is literally nothing of substance that can be discussed in this country without some labeling it and vilifying it from one political angle or the other. All of these issues require the acceptance of some amount of nuance, compromise, and a desire for the greater good of the country as a whole. Most folks have been so thoroughly indoctrinated that the other side is evil that critical thinking about anything is not happening. My side is either for it or against it. Any discussion starts and ends there.I don't mind government programs spending money on victims of addiction. I don't think we are doing a good job keeping illegal and dangerous drugs out of our country. Making overdose drugs available through a machine sounds like we've given up on the source of our problems and are just trying to put BandAids on an arterial bleeding wound
Never believed in it, but I gained even more empathy when a friends' son in his early 20's died of accidental overdose in college from fentanyl when they took what they thought was Adderall from a friend. Also, despite what you might think, not everyone who has a drug (including booze, the most insidious drug) addiction is a lost cause. ETA- I'd rather have Narcan and test strips flooding the streets than making it difficult to get, given that fentanyl kills in minutes.When did all you Darwinists stop believing in natural selection??
I think that it is a complex problem for which I have no answers. Unfortunately, we won't find answers because we are so highly politicized that there is literally nothing of substance that can be discussed in this country without some labeling it and vilifying it from one political angle or the other. All of these issues require the acceptance of some amount of nuance, compromise, and a desire for the greater good of the country as a whole. Most folks have been so thoroughly indoctrinated that the other side is evil that critical thinking about anything is not happening. My side is either for it or against it. Any discussion starts and ends there.
You're correct about the overall issue. But I'm worried more about heroin, fentanyl, etc., not pot or drugs that are possible compromise candidates.I think that it is a complex problem for which I have no answers. Unfortunately, we won't find answers because we are so highly politicized that there is literally nothing of substance that can be discussed in this country without some labeling it and vilifying it from one political angle or the other. All of these issues require the acceptance of some amount of nuance, compromise, and a desire for the greater good of the country as a whole. Most folks have been so thoroughly indoctrinated that the other side is evil that critical thinking about anything is not happening. My side is either for it or against it. Any discussion starts and ends there.
I would like to point out that the only reason I responded to your first post in this thread was because you basically called out (thinly veiled though it was) conservative Christians for professing publicly to care for the unfortunate, while secretly only caring about money (paraphrasing). I took offense at that notion and responded. Just wanted to clear that up, since you mentioned how we can't discuss any topic without politicizing it. I agree with that assessment, by the way, and apologize for my part in it. I hate that every OT thread turns political.I think that it is a complex problem for which I have no answers. Unfortunately, we won't find answers because we are so highly politicized that there is literally nothing of substance that can be discussed in this country without some labeling it and vilifying it from one political angle or the other. All of these issues require the acceptance of some amount of nuance, compromise, and a desire for the greater good of the country as a whole. Most folks have been so thoroughly indoctrinated that the other side is evil that critical thinking about anything is not happening. My side is either for it or against it. Any discussion starts and ends there.
I don't disagree with most of this take but we've been fighting the "War on Drugs" for, what, four decades now? Most people who are experts on that topic (and not just talking heads or yahoos on a message board) say it's been a failure. I'm not saying we should give up trying to keep drugs out - but if anything, I think we need to get more creative and be willing to try solutions that do have nuance and aren't just "drugs are bad, m'kay."I don't mind government programs spending money on victims of addiction. I don't think we are doing a good job keeping illegal and dangerous drugs out of our country. Making overdose drugs available through a machine sounds like we've given up on the source of our problems and are just trying to put BandAids on an arterial bleeding wound
Despite what I might think? WTF? I'm the one saying I think there are better ways to help the addicted than giving them free access to crack pipes. I give money and time and have helped several addicted people in my life personally. In fact I may know the kid you're talking about and his dad, for whatever that means. I wouldn't have given any of those people I know personally a crack pipe. Because that would not help them get over their addiction, unsurprisingly.Never believed in it, but I gained even more empathy when a friends' son in his early 20's died of accidental overdose in college from fentanyl when they took what they thought was Adderall from a friend. Also, despite what you might think, not everyone who has a drug (including booze, the most insidious drug) addiction is a lost cause. ETA- I'd rather have Narcan and test strips flooding the streets than making it difficult to get, given that fentanyl kills in minutes.
The War on Drugs was BS. I don't know how we can fix that problem. We should do something more than grandstanding to the media. I would prefer if we could do anything about the trafficking of drugs into the country than within but we have a horrible track record.I don't disagree with most of this take but we've been fighting the "War on Drugs" for, what, four decades now? Most people who are experts on that topic (and not just talking heads or yahoos on a message board) say it's been a failure. I'm not saying we should give up trying to keep drugs out - but if anything, I think we need to get more creative and be willing to try solutions that do have nuance and aren't just "drugs are bad, m'kay."
But I also think trying to keep drugs out of the country and making overdose drugs available on the street are two different things and that we can do both (or at least attempt to). I don't think trying to help the street level problems means we've given up trying to stop the higher level problem.
Amen!You're correct about the overall issue. But I'm worried more about heroin, fentanyl, etc., not pot or drugs that are possible compromise candidates.
It was not thinly veiled. I see "my tribe" as knee jerking against any spending by government to help people who are less fortunate because that "woke liberal Democrat stuff". I see daily, proclaiming Christians who are a whole lot more animated about who they hate for political reasons than who they love for reasons of following Christ. I've made a personal decision to no consume any media, or consider opinions, that serve to make me hate my fellow man. It simply isn't Biblical.I would like to point out that the only reason I responded to your first post in this thread was because you basically called out (thinly veiled though it was) conservative Christians for professing publicly to care for the unfortunate, while secretly only caring about money (paraphrasing). I took offense at that notion and responded. Just wanted to clear that up, since you mentioned how we can't discuss any topic without politicizing it. I agree with that assessment, by the way, and apologize for my part in it. I hate that every OT thread turns political.
I'm glad that we agree on the addiction issue. The crack pipe thing is dumb, but I really read over that to the Narcan and strips, which should be ubiquitous as soon as possible. We might be talking about the same person, but the sad part is that we're very likely not. And, the things that are being introduced into the supply now make fentanyl seem gentle. It's the first thing that has ever given me existential fear for my childrens' lives.Despite what I might think? WTF? I'm the one saying I think there are better ways to help the addicted than giving them free access to crack pipes. I give money and time and have helped several addicted people in my life personally. In fact I may know the kid you're talking about and his dad, for whatever that means. I wouldn't have given any of those people I know personally a crack pipe. Because that would not help them get over their addiction, unsurprisingly.
Narcan distribution is another matter. I was talking about our tax dollars handing addicts free crack pipes.
I can't imagine how they will keep it stocked. I can imagine an angry addict cremating that machine when it is empty of what they want.From NY Post
City officials’ new drug-themed vending machine is a huge hit with local addicts — who wasted no time cleaning it out overnight as they stocked up on its free crack pipes, lip balm and Narcan.
“Yes, I love it,” drug user Evelyn Williams told The Post while standing at the “public health” vending machine in Brownsville, Brooklyn, on Tuesday. “They put it in yesterday, and it’s empty already.
By 1 p.m., a drug-prevention-program worker was starting to restock the machine with more drug-test strips, Narcan and condoms — predicting the vending machine could need to be refilled “maybe twice a day, depending on which items go quite quickly.’’
“We have a lot of addicts and heroin users over here,” Williams said. “They should re-stock it immediately!”
Self-described crack smoker Minoshi Calpe, 56, had walked away with the second-to-last product in the vending machine — a fentanyl test strip — around 11 a.m. while sniffing that the glass used for the free pipes might not be up to her standards.
“I like the Pyrex because it’s a little thicker,’’ she said, also lamenting that “you can’t even sell that [vending stuff] because the programs give you all that stuff” already for free.
I would strongly reconsider relying on the NY Post for anything other than a sad laugh or Page Six gossip.From NY Post
City officials’ new drug-themed vending machine is a huge hit with local addicts — who wasted no time cleaning it out overnight as they stocked up on its free crack pipes, lip balm and Narcan.
“Yes, I love it,” drug user Evelyn Williams told The Post while standing at the “public health” vending machine in Brownsville, Brooklyn, on Tuesday. “They put it in yesterday, and it’s empty already.
By 1 p.m., a drug-prevention-program worker was starting to restock the machine with more drug-test strips, Narcan and condoms — predicting the vending machine could need to be refilled “maybe twice a day, depending on which items go quite quickly.’’
“We have a lot of addicts and heroin users over here,” Williams said. “They should re-stock it immediately!”
Self-described crack smoker Minoshi Calpe, 56, had walked away with the second-to-last product in the vending machine — a fentanyl test strip — around 11 a.m. while sniffing that the glass used for the free pipes might not be up to her standards.
“I like the Pyrex because it’s a little thicker,’’ she said, also lamenting that “you can’t even sell that [vending stuff] because the programs give you all that stuff” already for free.
It was not thinly veiled. I see "my tribe" as knee jerking against any spending by government to help people who are less fortunate because that "woke liberal Democrat stuff". I see daily, proclaiming Christians who are a whole lot more animated about who they hate for political reasons than who they love for reasons of following Christ. I've made a personal decision to no consume any media, or consider opinions, that serve to make me hate my fellow man. It simply isn't Biblical.
IF I could legitimately point people to my church, or any church, and believe that they would have the programs in place to help them, THEN I would believe that we need way less government help. Bottom line is that if we christians had been doing our job, the very need for government help would be reduced. I'm not saying that churches don't do some good things, but if you want to understand how lacking it is, do this before your next business meeting. Check the poverty rate in your immediate area, translate the to numbers and get a rough idea of what it would take to provide food for 25% of those in poverty. When you get your church financial statement, check the balance on your benevolence fund against your calculation.
Unfortunately, within my contemporaries, and sometimes myself, I see a default to selfish ambition and preservation of personal wealth over helping those less fortunate. I also see that often culture wars win out over following Christ. I'm not accusing you, or anyone else specifically, just observing and commenting hoping to provoke thought.