![www.espn.com](https://a2.espncdn.com/combiner/i?img=%2Fphoto%2F2021%2F0701%2Fr874701_1296x729_16%2D9.jpg)
NCAA OK's college football on-field sponsor logos
Starting this season, the NCAA will allow commercial sponsor advertisements on football fields for regular-season games in all three divisions, the organization announced on Thursday.
Or the Allstate netting for FG's and PAT's.How is that any different than companies sponsoring bowls? Seems to me that horse got out of the barn decades ago.
Really. I mean, why generate more? Why can't schools just tell the athletes "this is all you get".Honestly, I didn't even realize ads weren't already allowed on the field.
I noted this line in the article: "This change allows schools to generate additional income to support student-athletes,"
As a parent carefully planning how to cash-flow the undergraduate education of a rising HS senior with good-but-not-spectacular grades in his honors classes, I can honestly say I don't have much energy left to worry about how Carolina can generate even more money to better support its student-athletes.
Student athletes.Honestly, I didn't even realize ads weren't already allowed on the field.
I noted this line in the article: "This change allows schools to generate additional income to support student-athletes,"
As a parent carefully planning how to cash-flow the undergraduate education of a rising HS senior with good-but-not-spectacular grades in his honors classes, I can honestly say I don't have much energy left to worry about how Carolina can generate even more money to better support its student-athletes.
They can do this on TV games digitally and change the ads during the game. Like the first down line or the down and distance on NFL games. I've seen digital ads on basketball courts and on the backside of the pitchers mound.![]()
NCAA OK's college football on-field sponsor logos
Starting this season, the NCAA will allow commercial sponsor advertisements on football fields for regular-season games in all three divisions, the organization announced on Thursday.www.espn.com
"Sallie Mae Stadium" would be the most ironic, though appropriate, sponsorship."Welcome to Bojangles Field at Williams Brice Stadium"
Hockey is big into it.They can do this on TV games digitally and change the ads during the game. Like the first down line or the down and distance on NFL games. I've seen digital ads on basketball courts and on the backside of the pitchers mound.
Little leagues and other such (typically amateur) organizations obtain sponsors to defray their costs. University athletic programs are flush with money, so why do they need sponsors? Other than greed and to continue inflation and the arms race.Little league fields even have sponsor banners all over the fences …. As long as it’s not nascarish not a big deal.
I agree with you. I mean these student athletes get free tuition, free tutoring, free meals, free, medical and top of the line airline when they travel to an opposing team for an athletic event which translates to over $700,000 a year, and then to top if off less than 1% of all the athletes when they finish their eligibility even give back to the university. So from my standpoint I am not giving a penny to no NIL. That is just me and my personal opinion. If I offend anyone by this post I am sorry.Honestly, I didn't even realize ads weren't already allowed on the field.
I noted this line in the article: "This change allows schools to generate additional income to support student-athletes,"
As a parent carefully planning how to cash-flow the undergraduate education of a rising HS senior with good-but-not-spectacular grades in his honors classes, I can honestly say I don't have much energy left to worry about how Carolina can generate even more money to better support its student-athletes.
Soccer too, but they don't really have commercials.Hockey is big into it.
I can't watch soccer.Soccer too, but they don't really have commercials.
I’m not saying I like it. Like another poster said, I actually thought there was sponsorship around the stadium.. it’s no different than under armor and those types of sponsorships where their logo is prevalent everywhere at sporting events. I guess I’m equating no big deal with par for the course. Colleges would sell their mothers for a dollar nowadays.Little leagues and other such (typically amateur) organizations obtain sponsors to defray their costs. University athletic programs are flush with money, so why do they need sponsors? Other than greed and to continue inflation and the arms race.