I look at SEC baseball stats every year and I don't think I remember..

Xenomorph

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2007
13,534
4,301
113
...anything close to the complete domination UT is showing this season. A few snippets:

BA
1. UT .309
2. UV .297

SLUG
1. UT .616
2. LSU .515

RBI
1. UT 352
2. LSu 298

HR
1. UT 93
2. MSU 75

DOUBLES
1. UT 100
2. AU 83

TRIPLES
1. UT 20
2. AR 10

WALKS
1. UT 248
2 AM 209

ERA
1. UT 2.03
2. UV 2.92

OPP BA
1. UT .179
2. UV .199

SO
1. UT 449
2. MSU 447

**.....STUPID.....**
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,287
3,239
113
Surprisingly they are 4th in Conference Only BA at .276. We are at .262. They have hit 3 more HRs than us. They have just been so good on the mound to complement it (they have only walked 30 batters in conference. We are last at 103), don’t strike out as much and Im sure bat higher with RISP
 
Last edited by a moderator:

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,235
2,465
113
...anything close to the complete domination UT is showing this season. A few snippets:

BA
1. UT .309
2. UV .297

SLUG
1. UT .616
2. LSU .515

RBI
1. UT 352
2. LSu 298

HR
1. UT 93
2. MSU 75

DOUBLES
1. UT 100
2. AU 83

TRIPLES
1. UT 20
2. AR 10

WALKS
1. UT 248
2 AM 209

ERA
1. UT 2.03
2. UV 2.92

OPP BA
1. UT .179
2. UV .199

SO
1. UT 449
2. MSU 447

**.....STUPID.....**

VU**
 

PirateDawg

New member
Jan 9, 2020
1,751
0
0
Juiced bats? The guys on Sportstalk Radio said their stats have taken a dive since the SEC is checking bats.
 

Seinfeld

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
9,548
3,599
113
.616 team slugging is just insane. I’m not saying they’re on something, but if there were ever numbers to suggest as much, these would be it
 

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,236
2,570
113
Can't help but not think that...

But the stupidity involved in juicing the entire lineup would be astronomical. Odds are they are just really good and staying hot.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login