in the beginning of his tenure when we were under punishment I could see why he would show commitment thru thick and thin with a player who was inconsistent or not the best talent available from a purely survival standpoint of fielding a roster and not losing players.
However, I can see where this mentality from the earlier trauma can't be corrected. There is an expression "Loyal to a fault" this is an outcome we might be experiencing with Coach Franklin
So If he chose to anoint Tommy Stevens....wouldn't that be loyalty to a fault? How about Levis.....way was he not "loyal to a fault" with Levis? Franklin is only "loyal to a fault" when he doesn't play the "fair haired" boy of the moment.
Once again, fanboys know best. Coaches are just uninformed, overpaid clowns who get in the way of the BWICAC....the real football coaching experts.
Here's a thought. PSU is going to be the third or fourth best team in the Big Ten most years. They have/can beat Michigan 1of three or two of four and perhaps be number two in the conference.
That's who they are. That's their ceiling.
I'd love to see PSU surpass OSU and be in the playoffs most seasons. Please tell me the coach "WE" are hiring who is coming here and making this happen.
Perhaps the football geniuses here will take the position they do at QB....well just throw him in there and see what happens....they can't do any worse.
That's called the Nebraska method of coaching evaluation.
"WE" should only accept the coach who has a winning record against to 10 opponents.
I will await the list.
While we're Franklin bashing, please recycle all the tears and recriminations thrown at Franklin for "losing" Julian Fleming.
It's clear Julian would have put PSU over the top right?
AND if he did commit here with the results he has had to date you coaching experts would be claiming he ruined the Hope Diamond. Incredible stupidity on display here everyday. It's very entertaining.