He has to have some connection to the staff. Only way you can explain his reasoning.
I think we found Zach Arnett’s user name on six pack…
Ah the old "let's call out this user as a plant or insider because he doesn't have the same opinion as me" routine.
I've had this account since 2012. You think ZA knew we existed back then?
At least I'm not stomping around acting like we live in a day and age where teams get "demoted" for fielding 1 bad team in a decade the year after their prior coach passed away.
Sheesh our fanbase lives in a bubble where we are the only team that has bad years.
Circumstances and history dictate that we aren't going to fire ZA so I'm not going to stomp my feet and demand we fire him when I know its likely much better that I just see the positives and focus on how things are improving game-over-game.
I watched the meltdown from Mike Leach's year 1, and no excuse in the world worked back then either. Funny how after a 9 win season those excuses seem to have just been firmed up.
Its the day after a loss. I was warned in college not to read SPS after a loss. My philosophy is to just move on and hope the next game builds up on some of what we saw improve. So far, that's been the case since BYE. That's not me saying ZA deserves another year simply for that reason.
I have a very specific idea of what goals he should achieve knowing what we know now. After Rogers' injury, I was confident we could take all 3 games from the Ark/Aub/UK run. I felt we needed to win at least 2. Most people here didn't think we would win 1. We fell somewhere in between.
Now my adjusted goals are that we need to make a bowl, beat USM by at least 3 TD, and compete in the final 2 SEC games at the very least (no blowouts). By blowout, I mean I would like to see us keep them under 30 points. I don't consider UK a blowout. Blowouts usually have no hope of a comeback in the 4th.
If you or anyone else is so set on ZA being the problem, then he should have no problem failing 2 out of 3 of those goals, possibly all 3. Then we won't have any disagreements. However, I just simply don't see the program going that direction this season.
We started low with our FCS win, LSU was a very big low as far as game preparedness and execution, but since then, little-by-little we are seeing improvement. OL still misses, and I still maintain its because they are talentless and lazy. Secondary still gives up some big plays. Outside of those two positions, Mike Wright is the ONLY problem with this team. If week 1's team had the same cohesion and experience as they do now, we would be 7-2.
We will all ultimately see who is right, because it really isn't like any of us can do anything to change what will happen except stop attending games (oh wait that already happens...).
What we all should collectively be focused on is pushing the AD and football marketing to adopt the exact jerseys and branding we wore vs UK as our permanents. That is, after all, what matters most.**