Interesting video. Was our offense handicapped under Satterfield?
- Thread starter 18IsTheMan
- Start date
Love stat cat! Only got 10 min in and I’m already pissed. What a joke. Satt was clueless. We’re a 10-2 team at least with a simplified scheme. I’m gonna watch the while thing. But if you wanna save an hour, our scheme was crap, Satt was crap, and we missed a golden opportunity for a historic year.
Let’s go to the Danger Zone baby!!
Let’s go to the Danger Zone baby!!
Brooks has done his research. Impressive.
I'm sure Mrs Satt has some comments in the wings.
I'm sure Mrs Satt has some comments in the wings.
Was it handicapped under Satterfield? Is the sky blue?
No use crying over spilled milk, but it sure makes you wonder what might’ve been.
The frustration will stick with me for a long time. "What could have been" will echo to for a while.
It was kind of funny that after Satt's hiring at Nebraska was announced, Rhule put out a tweet about the "Satterfield offense" providing only the statistics from the UT and Clemson games. We, of course, understand that those games were shocking mainly for their anomalous nature. They were such stark outliers of his time here.
Last edited:
You can bet those two games will be brought up over and over to compare to our new offense by the Debbie downers who just want to crap on the new hire.
Those posters will just pretend two seasons don't count, only those two games, when it was doubtful Satterfield was even calling the plays, are the ones that count.
Just reinforcing what everyone knew. Good luck, Nebraska!
This should be mandatory viewing for all our coaches on the offense.
No, not doubtful. No Satterfield connection other than he happened to be on the field pretending to be the OC.
I think he nailed the analysis of our offense with this phrase: hodgepodge operation.
It was always incredulous to me how someone would point to one or two games and claim...."See, how lucky we are to have Satt?". But, just ignore the other games like they did not happen or matter? Get out of here. It's like a golfer who never breaks 100, then goes out and hits a "hole in one". Is he "PGA material"? To me, the telling statistic is that in 3 or 4 years as an OC at Temple and 2 years here, Satterfield never produced even a Top 50 offense out of 125 or 126 teams.
This is true. His track record of mediocrity began long before his stint here.
Of course, the pro-Satt crowd (well, probably a crowd of 1 person on here) would argue the only difference in the Tennessee and Clemson games and the previous 23 games is that we executed better.
SC's 53.9% Success Rate on 3rd Down with < 3 yards to gain was the SEC's 2nd worst. I was surprised to see that we were 2nd worst, it felt we were THE WORST. Hard to keep the defense fresh if they are constantly on the field.
He called the plays. The plays he had to choose from was the difference. I actually think he was probably a pretty good play caller. His game planning was a disaster.
I think we exhausted the savoriness of this chew toy awhile back. The Missouri game showed me all I needed to see.
Yep...and if there was any doubt, it was ALL erased after the UF game.
