AbsolutelyHow much additional revenue is our institution bringing in from football and basketball?
Does it cover the deficit in our other sports?
It does.How much additional revenue is our institution bringing in from football and basketball?
Does it cover the deficit in our other sports?
Byrne was literally speaking to a congressional committee when he said this. They are listening. There is bipartisan support to create legislation to fix this NIL mess.but no one is listening.
Wrong. They aren't listening. He is saying it's a bad idea to pay players from the football revenue. It is Saban that is saying that he thinks they should, because HE PERSONALLY didn't like dealing with paying the players and the collectives in general. He's just giving it lip service. Byrne needs to tell Saban to STFU and quit being a hypocrite. Saban is really acting like he didn't know players have been paid for 50 years through boosters. It's part of the game.Byrne was literally speaking to a congressional committee when he said this. They are listening. There is bipartisan support to create legislation to fix this NIL mess.
laying the groundwork for eliminating football scholarships and ultimately no revenue sports and still be in compliance with title 9
I’m not sure what even Congress can do to fix it. The courts are just going to overrule it. One huge flaw in the US Constitution is there is no effective check or balance on the judicial branch.Byrne was literally speaking to a congressional committee when he said this. They are listening. There is bipartisan support to create legislation to fix this NIL mess.
how many men basketball and baseball scholarships are there - 25 together? women’s volleyball may be on the chopping block. we blow up the entire student athletics model over the 10% that had very little interest in attending college. once again the minority screw up everything for the majority^ This.
Making football a business and letting everyone else fin for themselves... is where its headed and what Bryne is trying to say.
I dont know or care if they are listening.. but thats the read b/t the lines message.
translation - we have to dump more of the private bank slush funds into football to compete, so other teams will have to wear last years dirty jerseysTranslation: "Football drives the bus, so shut and sit down."
Right if you pull football.how many men basketball and baseball scholarships are there - 25 together? women’s volleyball may be on the chopping block. we blow up the entire student athletics model over the 10% that had very little interest in attending college. once again the minority screw up everything for the majority
BINGOhow many men basketball and baseball scholarships are there - 25 together? women’s volleyball may be on the chopping block. we blow up the entire student athletics model over the 10% that had very little interest in attending college. once again the minority screw up everything for the majority
Yeah….hilarious.BINGO
But on the plus side, how funny will it be to see the look on the faces of all those baseball, soccer, volleyball, softball (or whatever sports are cut) travel parents who dumped money for years into little Johnny's/Suzie's club teams.
And I'll just add that the courts don't have any responsibility to tell you how to navigate through the results of their decisions. They're just going to make a decision and then let you figure out the restI’m not sure what even Congress can do to fix it. The courts are just going to overrule it. One huge flaw in the US Constitution is there is no effective check or balance on the judicial branch.
Especially when people start to realize that this doesn't just affect a kid's ability to play sports in college. It affects their ability to go to college in a lot of casesYeah….hilarious.
Is the tv/sec revenue broken out by sport when the check comes or is it all lumped together?How much additional revenue is our institution bringing in from football and basketball?
Does it cover the deficit in our other sports?
Yes there is - draft laws that don't violate Constitutional rights.I’m not sure what even Congress can do to fix it. The courts are just going to overrule it. One huge flaw in the US Constitution is there is no effective check or balance on the judicial branch.
I agree with you. That said, it's not like a scholly is a lock today, especially in baseball. This calculus should absolutely already be factored in. If you're putting your kid's entire college fund (and likely, much more) into travel baseball, that's probably a poor decision.Especially when people start to realize that this doesn't just affect a kid's ability to play sports in college. It affects their ability to go to college in a lot of cases
Whether those "rights" are actually in the Constitution or not.Yes there is - draft laws that don't violate Constitutional rights.
Congress cannot fix it. At this point I’m confident the Supreme Court will rule any law as unconstitutional that serves to limit how much athletes can make or what school they can attend.Byrne was literally speaking to a congressional committee when he said this. They are listening. There is bipartisan support to create legislation to fix this NIL mess.
NO! State could spend every nickel from Academics, Research & Development and ALL non-revenue budgets and still would be a 7-5 to 8-4 average Football program and a middle of the pack Basketball program.Football and basketball are part of the SEC network revenue sharing. Baseball isn’t part of that agreement and therefore will continue to be a non revenue sport. Again. Invest less in baseball.
Yeah….hilarious.
And that is why I absolutely laugh at the people that do it.I agree with you. That said, it's not like a scholly is a lock today, especially in baseball. This calculus should absolutely already be factored in. If you're putting your kid's entire college fund (and likely, much more) into travel baseball, that's probably a poor decision.
I'm convinced most of our fans will never, ever understand this.NO! State could spend every nickel from Academics, Research & Development and ALL non-revenue budgets and still would be a 7-5 to 8-4 average Football program and a middle of the pack Basketball program.
Right if you pull football.
Basically to get back into compliance. Youd have to add something like Soccer and/or Cross Country for the men. Or Eliminate a sport like Rowing for the women, and reduce to amount of cholarships womens sports recieve. I mean currently the womens cross country team gets 18 full scholarships, and the rowing team gets 20.
It wont be that hard to get into compliance. But it will take either add a male sport or two, or all female athletes wont be on free rides anymore
Yes i realize. was a figure of speech. Minus football though, sports for sport, womens sports do get more scholarships. Therefore, if football were to leave, either those scholarships would have to even out back in favor of the men.All female athletes are definitely not on free rides, at least not full scholarships if that's what you meant.
For example at MSU alone: Minus footballAll female athletes are definitely not on free rides, at least not full scholarships if that's what you meant.
It's going to be women getting less (unless they find some way to link Title 9 to the scholarship free-less football separate entity somehow). UNLESS.....the men's sports are less profitable than the women's, then they'll just 17 over the men.Yes i realize. was a figure of speech. Minus football though, sports for sport, womens sports do get more scholarships. Therefore, if football were to leave, either those scholarships would have to even out back in favor of the men.
Examples:
Womens track and cross country both gets 18, mens 12.6
Womens basektball gets 15, mens 13
Womens swim 14, mens 10
Womens golf 6, men 4
All that would have to shift back to equal. Meaning mens sports would get more scholarships or women less. Currently there isnt a single sport outside of football where a male sport gets more scholarships than a female... and there are more scholarship female sports than males offered as well.
I agree it's the only way it can go and it's terrible. There are a lot of students out there majoring in sports management, kinesiology, etc who planned on coaching in college whose degrees would be wasted at that point. Football wouldn't survive any of this either I don't believe, who would care anymore?It's going to be women getting less (unless they find some way to link Title 9 to the scholarship free-less football separate entity somehow). UNLESS.....the men's sports are less profitable than the women's, then they'll just 17 over the men.
Sports will get cut, because I'll tell you how this plays out. Boosters aren't going to move their NIL donations to the non-revenue sports. They are going to keep buying football and basketball players, along with the TV money.
We aren't just going to freely subsidize this stuff, that's what I've been trying to tell everyone. It's not going to be like you think. And even if we did subsidize, most schools won't, so you won't have anyone to play.
We should also tell everyone post graduation they can’t ever change jobs, or maybe allow them to change only onceWant it fixed. Close the portal.
Once the portal happened, college athletics changed. Now its a rat race.
NIL isnt the problem. The portal is.
That user name gives you away. And guess what we can and have proven we can win in football and we are about to go to the NCAAT second year in a row. You are part of the problem not believing or not seeing we can and will win in football. You loungers and DNFers can’t come to grips that your sport doesn’t do anything for us .NO! State could spend every nickel from Academics, Research & Development and ALL non-revenue budgets and still would be a 7-5 to 8-4 average Football program and a middle of the pack Basketball program.