Iowa has played LSU like a fiddle.
- Thread starter karlchilders.sixpack
- Start date
HHahahahahhahHh 17 you, Kim.
And 17 you too, Angel Reese.
And 17 you too, Angel Reese.
This does not suck. I just hope they can knock off Don Staley’s cock(s).
Clark just sent Skeletor packing......She lit that *** up.........
I'm looking forward to Amy Poehler playing her in a hallmark or lifetime movie........
I'm looking forward to Amy Poehler playing her in a hallmark or lifetime movie........
That is the first time I watched Clark for an extended amount of time. She’s 17’n good.
Is it just me or does Mulkey look like she's in Vegas, playing on the 1 cent slot machines, smoking a cigarette, drinking a hot PBR beer, hoping to hit $25 for a taxi ride home.
Ok, this is my last one but Mulkey's clothes look like the bed spread of a 1970's porn flick....
Good job Iowa. Shoved that crown up Reese.... 17 lsu
You missed it, they said he sucks now. It's all gurl Powah! Stop the hate.
Please stop. Please.
She would’ve drawn the charge then hit a mid range jump shot
gawd i hate that reese ghetto garbage. take your 1 legged ***** back to the west bank.
i started watching clark for the shooting but came away more impressed with her passing. probably best player amateur i’ve ever seen
i started watching clark for the shooting but came away more impressed with her passing. probably best player amateur i’ve ever seen
you don’t watch much hs ball do you? if we could protect her in a zone she would start for our men’s team
… and no listed weights. We know some y’all fat. It’s just a number.
I'm guessing because their average hand size is smaller and a more proportional ball matters in a sport like basketball(vs soccer or volleyball).
As for why the rim isnt also smaller, constantly changing rims would be a logistical nightmare across the country at middle schools, a high schools, and colleges.
Yeah, I think a lot of folks have been hearing about her and haven't actually watched anything but highlights.
Seeing her in a full game against good competition is eye opening. She just controls games. She's got solid players around her, but nothing like the talent on the other top teams.
I don't know why she's going to the WNBA. She could make more money staying at Iowa another year.
She should stay around just for all the college ‘tang.****
More like the Silver Star
Hanging out in The Starlight Lounge!
Hmmm . . . . biology. I guess it does kinda generally matter in sports.
I seriously thought this was Kim Mulkey back in her playing days until I remembered she played at LA Tech.
Biology is also important outside of sports. Here's an example. Did you know that the good Lord made women's feet smaller so they could stand closer to the stove and the sink?
I'm assuming you're being facetious, but her whole game is being quicker than those her same height who try to guard her and shooting over smaller girls who try to guard her. Her size and quickness are the sweet spot for the girls game.
She wouldn't get off the bench at Belhaven, much less any D1 program. She would be much slower than the men guarding her.
From what I've heard, she'll still keep all her current endorsements, plus get her NBA salary. She has been offered $5mil to play in the "Big 3," but probably is not going to accept. Big 3 founder, Ice Cube, has stated he'd work it out so she wouldn't miss any WNBA games.
I don't know if you are serious but she wouldn't sniff the floor on a top AAU boys basketball team. She's an awesome women's player though.
No. She wouldn't. She just wouldn't. Not even for a good high school team. The difference in the level of strength and athleticism is on the order of magnitudes. Serena Williams in her prime was the most dominant women's tennis player ever. Her hitting partner for practice was a former ATP player who never cracked the top 200 (and wasn't training or playing competitively anymore). He dominated her.
This statement is flawed because greatness is comparative to the level of competition. If a 1A high school player put up the numbers Clark did you wouldn't proclaim that kid the greatest ever and rightfully so.
It is reasonable to say that Caitlyn Clark is the greatest women's college basketball player, Pete Maravich is the greatest men's college BB player and by default the greatest college BB player because men play at a significantly higher skill level. There is probably not a men's program at any level Clark could even make the team. It is not reasonable to say Pete is the best BB player at any level because he did not prove that in the highest level of competition the NBA.
She couldn’t play D1 men’s ball, but she’d be very good in boys HS ball. She can shoot, handle the ball, and makes great pass.
No she couldn't. She can shoot, no doubt about that, but she'd have to do that with a bigger ball in the men's game while evading players MUCH quicker, stronger, and taller than her. Not to mention she would get absolutely slaughtered on defense.
There is an immutable biological reason these tranny 'girls' do so well when they compete against real girls. There is also a reason why every women's college BB team scrimmages against a team of nondescript male students.
Doubt it on a high level team, the difference in speed/quickness and size between a female guarding her and high level HS male would be glaring.
Latest posts
-
-
Bulldog Club/Bulldog Initiative
- Latest: Anon1665155225
-
Get unlimited access today.