Not to nit pick, but I see 30.5 to 31 at most shops. Maybe it touched 30 and bounced back? I only say this because I'm pretty sure Iowa-Minny bottomed at 30.5, so 30 I believe be a new record low. I want to see this thing get into the 20s.Combined points over/under = 30
30. Yes 30.
That may be the lowest over under since they started inflating the football, rather than stuffing it full of feathers.
I think the smart money, still, may be on the "under".
Well, as long as he doesn't bet on NCAA football from the Old Main WiFi he might be ok.What if he’s a standing member?
You've got a one-track mindWhat if he’s a standing member?
I saw Bucknell-Penn three or four times when I was a kid. That level, I’m guessing.
It's the lowest O/U since... last week's Iowa game. Not kidding, these are the two lowest O/U's in NCAA history.Combined points over/under = 30
30. Yes 30.
That may be the lowest over under since they started inflating the football, rather than stuffing it full of feathers.
I think the smart money, still, may be on the "under".
it still might be 27.5 points too high. that game could end 2-0 in triple OT. the offenses are THAT good.
Two lowest totals ever have been the Minnesota-Iowa game the last two seasons, right?
So a safety in OT? Imagine what would have to happen for that.
That's what I heard. I don't see this one getting below 30.5, but who knows.
Woody, you ok? can't return a 2-point conversion attempt without scoring a td first.
Or, the possibility of a scoreless game going into, say 9 overtimes and the team winning on the 2-point try.
Imagine having the under on this game, game goes into OT 0-0 and the teams start trading TDs in OT?Or, the possibility of a scoreless game going into, say 9 overtimes and the team winning on the 2-point try.
So far, the under looks good. It's 0-0 at the half.Combined points over/under = 30
30. Yes 30.
That may be the lowest over under since they started inflating the football, rather than stuffing it full of feathers.
I think the smart money, still, may be on the "under".
They had 110 yards offense, combined, at the half.
Yep. I see it at bookmaker. We have a new record low for FBS.
I was thinking what a sick beat it would have been had it gone to OT at 7-7 then went over.
www.espn.com
So, I couldn't resist making a small play on that Rutgers Iowa under. Just to say I bet the record low.
I know that college plays are generally horrible legs to put into a teaser, but with this total, I'm really thinking I'll pair Iowa in some of my Wong teasers this weekend if I need any extra legs (or maybe even if I don't). At a total that low, the value of each point has to take on that much more to the point where it might be worth it (I've thought about it with some of these other ridiculously low totals, but the spread never fell in the right range).
Great point. I'm so programmed not to consider college for teasing, but Iowa up to 8.5 may have better value than a pro team with that total. Pair with Cleveland +2 (to +8) at Denver (total 35.5)?
Two of our TD drives started at the 39 and the 19...their offense completely set them up to fail that night. I'd take nothing at all away from their defensive performance.