Not much of an advantage when we aren't hosting post season play any more. Nice "newish" stadium empty in June. Welp.Advantage in what?
Not much of an advantage when we aren't hosting post season play any more. Nice "newish" stadium empty in June. Welp.Advantage in what?
Our fanbase has a very tough time grappling with the fact college baseball doesn’t matter at all
We also grapple with the fact that we can’t compete in football in the modern era.
Yeah, I would want to see full financial statements and any footnotes. To your point, I don’t trust some random author of an article to understand some of the nuance, so I have trouble believing profit/loss unless I’ve seen it myself or talked to someone who looked themselves. The fact that you saw it as part of a bid makes me feel much more confident in what you saw than the quote about losing a couple million.I asked this a couple weeks ago and someone posted a clarion ledger article where the writer said that MSU baseball lost $2.3 million in 2022. No other information was given except that. So, you have no way of knowing if that is a net loss that includes depreciation or any other non-cash losses. I suspect that loss includes depreciation.
I can say with 100% certainty that MSU baseball produced a profit prior to the stadium being built. I was with a group that put together a bid for financing the stadium expansion and saw baseball only statements, they were profitable then. Not a massive profit but they were self sustaining. I can’t imagine that has changed.
Definitely would need an accountant to verify this…. But seems like I remember there being odd rules around the way revenue is recognized for multi year commitments, such as donations pledged to be able to have club seats or chairbacks. I’m not sure that money coming in for past pledge amounts is “revenue” for the year it’s received. My point is, I’m not sure an income statement is the best way to evaluate if baseball is profitable. I think you’re gonna need a cash flow statement as well. I’m sure we have an accountant on here, so please correct this if I’m way off (which I probably am).
Yeah I'm calling BS on that too. Between sold out season tickets, premium seating, the Lofts and other private donations.... baseball does just fine I'm sure.Does anyone have actual financial statements with baseball numbers? I’ve heard we lose money, but I’d be happy to publicly analyze them. Or are the losses just based on articles from people who have information that isn’t generally public?
It matters to State fans. when a school has something that the fans like, sell it to them. Why would you dismiss something that is a huge tradition and well love piece of our athletic department.Our fanbase has a very tough time grappling with the fact college baseball doesn’t matter at all
I just changed my mind about everything since college baseball matters to you and your family.It matters enough to you that you have to spam every thread even tangentially related to baseball with how much baseball doesn’t matter. It’s such a tired schtick and you can’t seem to have a conversation about it without turning into a total douche.
Here’s the thing, I 17ing love Mississippi State baseball. It matters to me. It matters to my father. It matters to my kids. Some of my happiest times as a Mississippi State fan have been watching our baseball team and, yes, I love that we have the best goddam stadium in the country and 24 of the top 25 single game attendance records. I’m not alone in any of that. For 17’s sake, we won a goddam national championship.
So, 17 you for coming in here and sнitting on something we all love because it doesn’t generate as much revenue as football (which I also love). It doesn’t make money? Who gives a rat’s аss? It brings me and my family 17ing joy.
Have you all still not fully come to grips with the difference between now and the Mullen Era?We've never competed in football in any era except for short stints. And never for the big prize.
If anything, we've competed much more effectively recently than in the first half of our football existence.
Yeah, I would want to see full financial statements and any footnotes. To your point, I don’t trust some random author of an article to understand some of the nuance, so I have trouble believing profit/loss unless I’ve seen it myself or talked to someone who looked themselves. The fact that you saw it as part of a bid makes me feel much more confident in what you saw than the quote about losing a couple million.
Baseball has lost money essentially every year. The new numbers for ‘23 should be released later this month. I imagine it will look similar to years past - about a 1-2 million loss. I doubt people would lie about it losing money. That would be a very strange thing to do.Yeah I'm calling BS on that too. Between sold out season tickets, premium seating, the Lofts and other private donations.... baseball does just fine I'm sure.
When you want donations to keep flowing in, pretending that you're losing money is a good strategy.Baseball has lost money essentially every year. The new numbers for ‘23 should be released later this month. I imagine it will look similar to years past - about a 1-2 million loss. I doubt people would lie about it losing money. That would be a very strange thing to do.
Which begs the question: if baseball generates positive net revenue, why are those data not made public, or at least made a talking point? Perhaps we know the answer without getting an answer.Does anyone have actual financial statements with baseball numbers? I’ve heard we lose money, but I’d be happy to publicly analyze them. Or are the losses just based on articles from people who have information that isn’t generally public?
I’m not saying they’re lying. It’s just that there’s different ways to interpret financial statements, and it’d be interesting to see the breakdownBaseball has lost money essentially every year. The new numbers for ‘23 should be released later this month. I imagine it will look similar to years past - about a 1-2 million loss. I doubt people would lie about it losing money. That would be a very strange thing to do.
Many folks have a hard time grappling with the fact college baseball matters to a lot of people.Our fanbase has a very tough time grappling with the fact college baseball doesn’t matter at all
We have some miserable fans. I love going to the Dude, no matter what. It's the one thing we are know for.MSU baseball is my favorite sport. I don't get the hate for it. What do yall wanna do,, do away with everything except football and basketball? Who gives a 17 if it doesn't return a profit I could care 17ing less. That's not my job to worry about.
I think it’s great we care about it. I don’t think it’s great that it’s more of priority than football or that people would like reduce our resources given to football and give to baseball.Many folks have a hard time grappling with the fact college baseball matters to a lot of people.
Or even a harder time grappling with the fact that the baseball and basketball programs can compete at the highest level and football can not. football gets the same sec welfare check either way.Many folks have a hard time grappling with the fact college baseball matters to a lot of people.
The stadium was rebuilt just a few years ago. At that time, EVERYONE who wanted seats had the opportunity to buy them. NOBODY was denied grandstand seats that was willing to purchase them.Especially considering the grandstand seats are an inherited spot
This is nonsense. I get 4 season tickets for baseball & football. The per seat season ticket prices are within $100 of each other and even with the BDC required donation, the price difference is less than $300 total for 4 seats. Below is an excerpt from the payment notes I keep:They get the equivalent of 1989 football season ticket prices for their seats.
I don't believe I've said anywhere in this thread anything about revenue or it "producing a profit" other than the original post saying that almost 11,000 fans show up and buy tickets, and that's more than a "club sport"? You're the one that started down talking revenue production from the start.I’m not sure why you’re using attendance in a particular sport at a particular school to make this argument.
it’s well documented that there are a handful of schools in the SEC, Mississippi State included, who support and show up for college baseball games. But unfortunately, that doesn’t mean that college baseball will now magically begin to produce revenue enough to generate a profit or become more popular nation-wide. It’s a niche sport. That’s great if you support it, but it doesn’t matter enough to affect Mississippi State’s athletic budget, the university, or the city of Starkville. I’m glad you like it though, I hope we win every game. I’m sure MSU baseball matters a lot to Mike in Kosciusko.
With average attendance being 10k, a $3-$6 bump in individual ticket price will wipe that loss.- about a 1-2 million loss.
Just for curiosity (I'm not pitting one against another) but what are basketball numbers?Baseball has lost money essentially every year. The new numbers for ‘23 should be released later this month. I imagine it will look similar to years past - about a 1-2 million loss. I doubt people would lie about it losing money. That would be a very strange thing to do.
Biggest difference is basketball gets TV rights revenue. Baseball does not.Just for curiosity (I'm not pitting one against another) but what are basketball numbers?
Because I don't believe basketball sells as many regular tickets or brings in premium seat revenue that baseball does at MSU.
I'm going conspiracy theory here....Which begs the question: if baseball generates positive net revenue, why are those data not made public, or at least made a talking point? Perhaps we know the answer without getting an answer.
Exactly. So one gets a welfare check and the other doesn't. However standing alone, one would be in the red every year and another not.Biggest difference is basketball gets TV rights revenue. Baseball does not.
One gets a check for being a marketable product. The other is a regional sport no one cares about hence no tv moneyExactly. So one gets a welfare check and the other doesn't. However standing alone, one would be in the red every year and another not.
Same for football, except for attendance. All of these 4 win predictions have fans really fired up and top portal players flocking in........Yay attendance! Glad to see it is helping in recruiting and getting these top portal players…
From the SEC website concerning the new ESPN Football SEC deal:Biggest difference is basketball gets TV rights revenue. Baseball does not.
Wrong.One gets a check for being a marketable product. The other is a regional sport no one cares about hence no tv money
I think people are excited to see what happens in football this year with Jeff Lebby, his offensive staff has done pretty damn well in the portal, defense...that might be a different story. Jans did exceptionally well in the portal. We like to think of the history of State baseball and how we are one of the "big boys" but we have a coaching staff that is scared about recruits and portal players getting publicized, afraid some other school is going to come in and take a player that visited. We can tout attendance and stadium all day long, they are great, its awesome we have the support we do for a program but would be a lot better to tout Omaha trips, Nattys, etc...over a "attendance championship". At this point its overplayed and irrelevant especially when we are getting passed by teams with smaller stadiums and attendance numbers.Same for football, except for attendance. All of these 4 win predictions have fans really fired up and top portal players flocking in........
From the SEC website concerning the new ESPN Football SEC deal:
"The new agreement is separate and in addition to existing agreements with ESPN for events in football, men's and women's basketball, baseball and softball, as well as the agreement that created and under which ESPN operates the SEC Network. These existing agreements also continue through 2033-34"
And football/basketball create 98% of the revenue for that deal. They have to put the other sports in their due to SEC demands but ESPN would gladly cut all of those. Do you really think ESPN wants to spend money covering a sport that 12 people watch?Wrong.
"The new agreement is separate and in addition to existing agreements with ESPN for events in football, men's and women's basketball, baseball and softball, as well as the agreement that created and under which ESPN operates the SEC Network. These existing agreements also continue through 2033-34"
I liken this to the drag car driver who is handed a great vehicle, but he $h!+s his pants at the tree. Lemonis $h!+s his pants when it counts. He is exactly what we thought he was when he was hired and sold as the "secret behind McDonnell's success." Cohen bull$h!+.I think people are excited to see what happens in football this year with Jeff Lebby, his offensive staff has done pretty damn well in the portal, defense...that might be a different story. Jans did exceptionally well in the portal. We like to think of the history of State baseball and how we are one of the "big boys" but we have a coaching staff that is scared about recruits and portal players getting publicized, afraid some other school is going to come in and take a player that visited. We can tout attendance and stadium all day long, they are great, its awesome we have the support we do for a program but would be a lot better to tout Omaha trips, Nattys, etc...over a "attendance championship". At this point its overplayed and irrelevant especially when we are getting passed by teams with smaller stadiums and attendance numbers.
They've just completed broadcasting 119 games of Regionals and Super Regionals and have 16 (maybe 17 more) on this week of World Series games for those 12 people, but I'm sure they don't want to........And football/basketball create 98% of the revenue for that deal. They have to put the other sports in their due to SEC demands but ESPN would gladly cut all of those. Do you really think ESPN wants to spend money covering a sport that 12 people watch?
I don't think men's basketball means all that much nationally either except for about 2 weeks in March between the time people put their brackets together and the time their brackets get busted.North Dakota averages over 11,000 for college hockey. Do we care? Of course not. College Baseball = College Hockey. Fun but doesn't mean much in the grand scheme of things like football and men's basketball.
North Dakota averages over 11,000 for college hockey. Do we care? Of course not. College Baseball = College Hockey. Fun but doesn't mean much in the grand scheme of things like football and men's basketball.
I think basketball generates in the $5-10MM profit range on average. For Auburn, it generated $20MM in profit last year, as this article points out. They made a conscious effort to invest in basketball about 10 years ago and it’s paid off. I really wish we had this type of leadership. Prior to the 2010s, we had a much better history and basketball program than Auburn, we had more NCAATS, SECT championships, and final fours. It all comes down to leadership and commitment with football and Men’s basketball.Just for curiosity (I'm not pitting one against another) but what are basketball numbers?
Because I don't believe basketball sells as many regular tickets or brings in premium seat revenue that baseball does at MSU.
Have you all still not fully come to grips with the difference between now and the Mullen Era?
Leach competed, yes, but again, he's a niche guy. w Will Lebby be? We will see.