Karen Read Trial
- Thread starter POTUS
- Start date
There’s a lot of details you’re leaving out. You must not be keeping up with the case. Thought she was guilty too at first.
I always said if I was on trial for a crime I didn’t commit I would opt for a bench trial.
The tail light was still intact when she was seen on surveillance looking for him well after the supposed incident. Interesting right?You reading what I'm reading? I was paraphrasing and went and checked it was hair DNA found on HER broken tail light AND pieces of said tail light found at crime scene. Sorry about the hair / blood thing.
What to know on the Karen Read murder case and mistrial
Prosecutors have vowed to retry Read after a mistrial in her murder case. She has claimed innocence and alleges law enforcement officers are trying to frame her in John O’Keefe’s death.www.nbcnews.com
Please link to a credible source this info about OJ hiring a lawyer for his son while riding around in the Bronco because you’re lying.
She looks like AOC to me and is therefore guilty for looking like a crazy azz be-otch
The defense did a pretty good job of showing how they did exactly that.
Not to mention that same police department, unbeknownst to them until this trial, has been under FBI investigation for some time for corruption of this very nature.
Last edited:
I'm referencing the facts.
That PD had been under FBI investigation for corruption. Investigators deleted texts messages from the defendants phone. None of the experts including the prosecutions say that a vehicle made contact with the deceased. The dog bite marks don't align with a vehicle collision and the house where the party was had a dog and was rehomed elsewhere afterward. The concrete floor in that basement was jackhammered out and replaced with new concrete. The broken glass at the scene wasn't there until after they found out her vehicle backed into his. Owner of that house gave a gift to the lead investigator and he said give it to his wife instead so it looks less obvious.
Those are the facts feel free to enlighten me with your own bc blabbering "conspiracy theory" bs is not an argument on facts.
If they have proof of that then why are they at trial? And what's the explanation of going 20mph in reverse for 60 feet?
The investigators texted amongst themselves they were going to pin it on the woman, meaning the defendant. Investigators convinced the prosecution it was her, so charges were brought. The exculpatory evidence wasn't known until after charges were brought so the trial proceeds.
I'm still trying to figger out the reverse schit that happened at 12:45 a.m. If she's acquitted, a new investigation needs to happen. We're they not living together? What's up with her dropping him off at his buddy's house? Who had a reason to off him?
Tell me you're new to police reform efforts, without telling me you're new to police reform efforts.
At least occasionally try not to come across as a massive prick when there's absolutely no reason to be one.
she’s a steaming pile of shít. Like they all are.
Well, I did see it on the internet and It did make me think, “Does OJ even have a son?” Be nuts if true.
Not at all. You just seem to be someone who needs to be told they're acting like an azz, because it's clearly not as obvious to you as it is to basically everyone else here.
Dude, by internet standards, that wasn't much. And I assure you I am much nicer to people on this board than they are to me. Anyone who can't handle being wrong and thinks i'm the ahole for pointing it out, is not my problem.
Geez I wonder why you're not complaining to them???Gee, I wonder why people here aren't nice to you???
But, I hear you. I could he nicer.....but, dude. I responded with "tell me you don't X without telling me you don't X". That's a 1 out of 10 for internet meanness. It's basically an internet hello. If you have a past complaint, you should have aired it then.Gee, I wonder why people here aren't nice to you???
I've communicated what I felt the need to communicate. I'm quite sure it will have no effect on you, but I tried.
You've communicated you're an ahole who expects others to behave a way you don't hold yourself to. Congrats.
Maybe, maybe not. You came in hot and got what you asked for. Try acting the way you preach next time, see how it goes.
Get unlimited access today.