Makai Polk declares for NFL Draft

57stratdawg

Well-known member
Mar 24, 2010
27,803
3,342
113
That stings, but he’s replaceable. At least in the aggregate.

Hopefully he’s not signing with an agent yet.
 
Last edited:

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,184
9,618
113
Another season here wasn’t going to change his draft stock much. Best of luck to him.
 

thatsbaseball

Well-known member
May 29, 2007
16,647
4,145
113
In the "air raid" has Leach historically had receivers that racked up individual big stats. We spread it around a lot and throwing the long ball wasn't exactly our QB's strong point .
 

Go Budaw

Member
Aug 22, 2012
7,321
0
36
I guess the gold standard would be whatever Crabtree did.

Crabtree had 134 receptions for almost 2,000 yards and 22 touchdowns….as a freshmen. Dialed back to 97 / 1200ish / 19 TD’s as a Sophomore, but that’s still crazy. He was really damn good.
 

Jacknut1

New member
May 23, 2010
333
0
0
Really? He’s a good receiver. But he wasn’t even a top 20 SEC receiver in yards per reception.

He was our leading receiver with 989 yards. Next best was Walley with 610. He also led us in catches at 98. Next best was Marks with 79 and the next best receiver was Walley with 52 catches. I hope Walley can be that guy in 2022 after a bit of a sophomore slump this year.
 

Dawgg

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2012
7,653
6,313
113
Crabtree had 134 receptions for almost 2,000 yards and 22 touchdowns….as a freshmen. Dialed back to 97 / 1200ish / 19 TD’s as a Sophomore, but that’s still crazy. He was really damn good.

Yeah, he was, but that was also in the late 2000's, at the height of the Big 12's severe lack of defense. It seems like every game had at least one team scoring about 50.
 

047Dog

New member
Jan 29, 2020
726
0
0
He was our leading receiver with 989 yards. Next best was Walley with 610. He also led us in catches at 98. Next best was Marks with 79 and the next best receiver was Walley with 52 catches. I hope Walley can be that guy in 2022 after a bit of a sophomore slump this year.

That's great. But he still was not in the top 20 in yards per catch. As a matter of fact, he was 41st. Ooof.
 

Jacknut1

New member
May 23, 2010
333
0
0
That's great. But he still was not in the top 20 in yards per catch. As a matter of fact, he was 41st. Ooof.

That's great. I didn't say he was. He was the leading receiver on our team and I hope someone steps up and can replace him.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,478
3,418
113
Really? He’s a good receiver. But he wasn’t even a top 20 SEC receiver in yards per reception.
That's great. But he still was not in the top 20 in yards per catch. As a matter of fact, he was 41st. Ooof.

Is yards per reception the singular statistic that determines if a receiver should be drafted? I wouldnt think it is, but the way you are pushing it, it seems you strongly believe so.
 

Go Budaw

Member
Aug 22, 2012
7,321
0
36
Yeah, he was, but that was also in the late 2000's, at the height of the Big 12's severe lack of defense. It seems like every game had at least one team scoring about 50.

Except Crabtree was still the best EVER in the Big 12 over a single season. Crabtree’s freshmen season was and still is the single season record for most receiving yards in Big 12 history. He had 130 yards more than 2nd most (Terrence Williams at Baylor in 2012). For comparison, Dez Bryant’s best season at Oklahoma State was only 1480 yards. The 22 TD’s were also 2nd most in Big 12 history.

Also, Crabtree played way before the trend of hurry up offenses and targeting rules made it way easier to accumulate huge passing / receiving numbers, and yet his record still stands.
 

Seinfeld

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
9,563
3,624
113
Until I looked it up, I honestly had no idea that he was 6'3" 200 lb. Obviously not Devante Adams size, but not at all bad either.
 

047Dog

New member
Jan 29, 2020
726
0
0
Is yards per reception the singular statistic that determines if a receiver should be drafted? I wouldnt think it is, but the way you are pushing it, it seems you strongly believe so.


No, but just like Rogers inflated stats, there is some eye opening curiosity there. Dude didn't average 10 yards per reception. If that's not the definition of possession receiver, I don't know what is. And those aren't exactly what the NFL is looking for in the draft.

The fact that FORTY guys in the SEC had a better average should cause a little alarm.
 

Trojanbulldog19

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2014
8,895
4,385
113
Well he was the best receiver we had. Hopefully Heath stays and can get to that level. Definitely more athletic.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,478
3,418
113
No, but just like Rogers inflated stats, there is some eye opening curiosity there. Dude didn't average 10 yards per reception. If that's not the definition of possession receiver, I don't know what is. And those aren't exactly what the NFL is looking for in the draft.

The fact that FORTY guys in the SEC had a better average should cause a little alarm.

He played within a system and what you see in the stats is the result of that system. You are complaining he didnt have more yards after catch or yards per reception, but he didnt choose the routes. He ran the routes that were called and did what he could to impact the game(fight for the ball, run routes well, try to shed tacklers, etc).
If you are saying he sucks at shedding tacklers and therefore should have had more yards, ok then say that and it can be discussed.
But just complaining multiple times that he didnt have more yards per reception is a pretty basic evaluation.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login