It’s early, but is it fair to begin commenting upon the leadership and decisions of Beamer? He’s basically 2 seasons in. When does it become justified if not necessary to review and comment upon his ability and judgment as a HC? I’m asking because 2 years seems a reasonable amount of time to me to build a body of work worth reviewing.
I would think that after this season, he should be able to judge his coordinator's progress (or lack of). Meaning, he gets a pass for the initial hirings, but keeping or firing them now are a reflection of his abilities to make decisions.