Well the quacks are adding them daily:
- fa____t
-tra_____y
- ret___d
It’s not the word that is so bad - it’s the weak
Nope. I have never understood the whole n-word phenomena. If you can, good for you but when a white person can actually lose their job for saying a damn word because blacks claim it is so offensive that it will somehow ruin their lives but a black man can say it and it's OK with them..... I'm calling it ********.
Yep. As I remember it, sucker punched.I read this as:
"When I punched that girl inside a Subway, it was Coach Gundy that was there for me."
Its not OK for either to say it or any derivative of it while on the clock. You haven’t spent much time in the public or private sector lately (or ever) if you think that it is.
Well the quacks are adding them daily:
- fa____t
-tra_____y
- ret___d
It’s not the word that is so bad - it’s the weak
I just don't see how a member of one race can be singled out for harsh punishment for saying a damn word that another race can say with complete impunity.
C
3. Does “honky” really offend you? That’s an earnest question. I suppose it does some people, but I think some people just think they’re supposed to be offended by it. I dunno. It doesn’t bother me. I certainly don’t think it rises to N word level.
I feel sorry for you.
It's his ***.
Ahhhh precious snowflake…..did my words hurt you
I think there is a whole universe of jobs and work environments that you aren't familiar with. Probably a lot of businesses in Mississippi that would just have to shut down if they started firing black people for saying any derivative of it.
I don't really get the concern with it. I mean, I definitely think it would be better if nobody used it, but I don't have a problem with it being different standards. I don't have a problem with the fact that lots of guys talk about p#$%% at work with other guys in ways that would get them written up immediately if not fired if they did it with or even in front of women. I'd tell them it's better for them not to do it at all and they will be written up if they are talking about it in front of any management and they are playing with fire, but I'm not going to pretend the context isn't different.
I worked in the "private sector" 50 years. During those years I employed a number of black men, many of whom I still stay in touch with. I heard the vast majority of them use the n-word but I never gave a second's consideration to firing any of them for because they were talking with other black employees and never said it in front of customers. I personally never used the word at work especially in front of them. I even physically threw a guy out of a business because he called one of my guys the word. My point is that the word is terribly distasteful, rude and hurtful particularly if used in the wrong situation and context and should frowned upon and punished in some cases but the split standard we have now is doing more harm than good. I just don't see how a member of one race can be singled out for harsh punishment for saying a damn word that another race can say with complete impunity.
Of course people still say it in that context in a non-work related conversation. That’s why I specified “on the clock”. If it’s said in an official business interaction or even in a non-business interaction in front of the wrong people (management or customers), it’s frowned upon at best and grounds for immediate termination at worst. I don’t know any common work environment with multiple employees under a single employer where that statement would not be true. Hence….not OK to say. “Not OK” doesn’t necessarily mean “automatically will get fired if this happens”, although it certainly could result in that in the wrong context.
Why would you think I'd have trouble believing that? That said, I suspect most of them aren't working in places where it's accepted and if they were, they'd tolerate it unless and until they moved up to a position where they could do something about it.Believe it or not, there are entire swaths of black people that absolutely detest hearing even the “OK version” from other black people.
What made you think I am talking about non-work related conversation? Again, there is a whole universe of jobs you're not familiar with where it is more or less ok. If you don't get reprimanded and it doesn't hurt your position to say it, then I would say it is de facto "ok" to say it in those places.
Why would you think I'd have trouble believing that? That said, I suspect most of them aren't working in places where it's accepted and if they were, they'd tolerate it unless and until they moved up to a position where they could do something about it.
It's not ok because if they say it in front of a manager or a person of a different race, they are likely 17ed. In contrast, if it's 4 black guys on a crew and a person off the crew heard one of them use that word or some version of it, they likely wouldn't even think to notify HR, and if they did, they'd get either a quizzical 'wtf' look or a perfunctory verbal response to the worker using the word, not strict disciplinary action.The statement above is absurd. So if I, a white guy, drop the hard -R version in a lunch convo with 4 other white guys, and none of them turn me in to HR or my boss or whoever (and therefore I am not reprimanded and I don’t suffer any consequences in my position), that makes it “de facto OK” to say it? Of course not.
That's perfectly good as a normative statement. But your reference to not being in the public or private workforce for the past 40 years sure made it seem like you were making a positive statement and just had a narrow view of the workplace.It’s a term that has a non-zero % chance of offending literally any potential surrounding person. Those chances veer from “above 0%” to “damn near 100%” depending on various contexts. Therefore, its not OK to say in a group work setting….regardless of accepted norms, culture, the race of the person saying it, or the races of the people within earshot. Point blank.
It's not ok because if they say it in front of a manager or a person of a different race, they are likely 17ed. In contrast, if it's 4 black guys on a crew and a person off the crew heard one of them use that word or some version of it, they likely wouldn't even think to notify HR, and if they did, they'd get either a quizzical 'wtf' look or a perfunctory verbal response to the worker using the word, not strict disciplinary action.
Same reason uncle Ben’s Is Ben’s original. Aunt syrup, Cleveland Indians, redskins, etc.
Minorities don’t really give a ****. White Libs do though.
It’s cultural appropriation if you ask me.
It's a new world order in higher ed and college athletics
Just so we’re all on the same page... at what point was it appropriate for white coaches to say the N word in a room full of black athletes?
Also, how the hell is this thread not locked yet?
I thought PBdog’s guess the slur hangman game would have done it, but I guess not.
Ha! So yall were recreating that Chevy Chase/Richard Pryor Word Association sketch!One of my friends and I were drinking one night a few years ago and talking about race (he's a black guy) and we discovered that "white privilege" was the only thing he could say regarding my race that would offend me. And he even went after penis size... And I tell, you it really irks me when I hear it still. I feel irrational that it does, but it just pisses me off a little.
That said, considering he is ten years younger than me and would make GloryDawg look like a bantamweight, I didn't utter a peep of something that might offend him. He asked me to, but I declined out of an abundance of caution. (Covid vernacular in another use baby. Hell yeah.)
Never has been appropriate and never will be. Period. My comment is toward the increasing swiftness in which these unacceptable behaviors are confronted and addressed.
I retract my previous comment. Once is a slip up, not paying attention. Multiple times is just stupid. I assumed he hit the word and it spilled out accidentally and he stopped. He's likely 17ed.
It gets said on the clock a lot.
Might not be a work convo but it’s on the clock.
I worked in the "private sector" 50 years. During those years I employed a number of black men, many of whom I still stay in touch with. I heard the vast majority of them use the n-word but I never gave a second's consideration to firing any of them for because they were talking with other black employees and never said it in front of customers. I personally never used the word at work especially in front of them. I even physically threw a guy out of a business because he called one of my guys the word. My point is that the word is terribly distasteful, rude and hurtful particularly if used in the wrong situation and context and should frowned upon and punished in some cases but the split standard we have now is doing more harm than good. I just don't see how a member of one race can be singled out for harsh punishment for saying a damn word that another race can say with complete impunity.
You make some very good points.
We all know that words can hurt people. However, language is a funny thing, and we always have to consider the context in which the words were used.
We can't have a "blanket" rule that says a white person must be strung up every time he/she uses the n-word. That seems extreme and unreasonable to me. And I agree with your point that applying a "blanket" rule to white people and not all people is wrong (racist?).
Finally, we are all human beings, and we occasionally make mistakes.